Kavanaugh vote postponed. Judiciary Committee hearing on Sexual Assault complain Monday.

[Anonymous]

Has this been posted? Letter from Yale Law alumni calls him “morally bankrupt” and opposes his nomination.

https://other98.com/brett-kavanaughs-fellow-alumni-at-yale-law-school-are-calling-him-morally-bankrupt-in-a-scathing-letter/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has this been posted? Letter from Yale Law alumni calls him “morally bankrupt” and opposes his nomination.

https://other98.com/brett-kavanaughs-fellow-alumni-at-yale-law-school-are-calling-him-morally-bankrupt-in-a-scathing-letter/

Do you think those signing the letter could be liberals who have a political reason for opposing his nomination? Is that possible?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reading through some of these posts and reminded that A) misogyny is alive and well in this country and B) victims of sexual assault are incredibly brave to speak out against their attackers. The way some of the PPs have attacked this woman and attempted to discredit her is really gross.

OR

Reading through some of these posts and reminded that A) feelings of jealousy and hatred of men are alive and well by many on this thread and B) victims of sexual assault accusations (not convictions) are incredibly brave to try to defend themselves against their attackers. The way some of the PPs have attacked this man (Kavanaugh) and attempted to discredit and convict him via one woman's accusations of attempted rape and suffocation after 30+ years is really gross.

So in your mind, women (and men) who defend the accuser’s right to be heard and not summarily dismissed and/or savaged and discredited equates to people who are jealous and hate men?

Okie dokie.

NOPE. Not what I said. I'm saying that I don't think the accused should be "savaged and discredited" either. And, yes, there have been a lot of DCUM posts on Kavanaugh threads that describe men--and Kavanaugh, in particular-- in an incredibly vile and negative way.

This may be news to you, but putting aside the sexual assault allegations, Kavanaugh has consistently treated women as second class citizens in his opinions. Most women don’t appreciate that. Shocking, I know.

PP here. A person's reputation, which can vary depending on the political, religious, cultural, etc. perspective of others, shouldn't be the determining factor re turning an accusation into a conviction by public opinion.

He is not getting convicted of anything. His suitability for a lifetime appointment to one of the most important jobs in the country is being determined. Character and perception counts. But even if he is found unworthy, he still has his current prestigious lifetime appointment and his girls' basketball team. Not a bad consolation prize for what could have been a life-changing mistake for him.

So you think he's innocent? No, you don't. You've convicted him of being guilty and not worthy of the appointment.

I think we've heard enough to say that he isn't a suitable candidate for a Supreme Court judge. Period. Not only are character and perception important for this position, as PP said. But there's a reason why we look for candidates that don't have skeletons in their closet. The integrity of our institutions hangs on whether this person can be blackmailed.

I mean, look at Trump. Does Putin have something on him? I don't know, but that scene in Helsinki was mighty odd if he doesn't.

He’s a great and suitable candidate. One 35 year old allegation full of holes doesn’t change that.

The fact that one or more conservative posters or bots spent the overnight posting this nonsense just proves how strong Ford’s allegations are.

Another possibility for you to consider: There are those of us who think it's wrong to rush to judgment and publicly vilify someone based on one person's 30 year old recollections and last minute accusations. Even though I'm a woman, I would never automatically assume that an accuser is without motivation. We should wait and hear both sides. She may be truthful, but I want to hear more. Do you honestly think every woman is truthful, and every man is a liar?

If you partied in HS---and if you went to beach week---you have vivid memories of who did what. Sure, most of us have grown up and stopped getting blackout drunk after college...but that doesn't change what they did when they were younger.

I think Kav and Ken Starr and Mark Judge were sexually frustrated sex-obsessed dudes back in the day. And I think Kav didn't really settle down until his 40s...right around the time God punishes some men with ED.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reading through some of these posts and reminded that A) misogyny is alive and well in this country and B) victims of sexual assault are incredibly brave to speak out against their attackers. The way some of the PPs have attacked this woman and attempted to discredit her is really gross.

OR

Reading through some of these posts and reminded that A) feelings of jealousy and hatred of men are alive and well by many on this thread and B) victims of sexual assault accusations (not convictions) are incredibly brave to try to defend themselves against their attackers. The way some of the PPs have attacked this man (Kavanaugh) and attempted to discredit and convict him via one woman's accusations of attempted rape and suffocation after 30+ years is really gross.

So in your mind, women (and men) who defend the accuser’s right to be heard and not summarily dismissed and/or savaged and discredited equates to people who are jealous and hate men?

Okie dokie.

NOPE. Not what I said. I'm saying that I don't think the accused should be "savaged and discredited" either. And, yes, there have been a lot of DCUM posts on Kavanaugh threads that describe men--and Kavanaugh, in particular-- in an incredibly vile and negative way.

This may be news to you, but putting aside the sexual assault allegations, Kavanaugh has consistently treated women as second class citizens in his opinions. Most women don’t appreciate that. Shocking, I know.

PP here. A person's reputation, which can vary depending on the political, religious, cultural, etc. perspective of others, shouldn't be the determining factor re turning an accusation into a conviction by public opinion.

He is not getting convicted of anything. His suitability for a lifetime appointment to one of the most important jobs in the country is being determined. Character and perception counts. But even if he is found unworthy, he still has his current prestigious lifetime appointment and his girls' basketball team. Not a bad consolation prize for what could have been a life-changing mistake for him.

So you think he's innocent? No, you don't. You've convicted him of being guilty and not worthy of the appointment.

I think we've heard enough to say that he isn't a suitable candidate for a Supreme Court judge. Period. Not only are character and perception important for this position, as PP said. But there's a reason why we look for candidates that don't have skeletons in their closet. The integrity of our institutions hangs on whether this person can be blackmailed.

I mean, look at Trump. Does Putin have something on him? I don't know, but that scene in Helsinki was mighty odd if he doesn't.

He’s a great and suitable candidate. One 35 year old allegation full of holes doesn’t change that.

The fact that one or more conservative posters or bots spent the overnight posting this nonsense just proves how strong Ford’s allegations are.

Another possibility for you to consider: There are those of us who think it's wrong to rush to judgment and publicly vilify someone based on one person's 30 year old recollections and last minute accusations. Even though I'm a woman, I would never automatically assume that an accuser is without motivation. We should wait and hear both sides. She may be truthful, but I want to hear more. Do you honestly think every woman is truthful, and every man is a liar?

If you partied in HS---and if you went to beach week---you have vivid memories of who did what. Sure, most of us have grown up and stopped getting blackout drunk after college...but that doesn't change what they did when they were younger.

I think Kav and Ken Starr and Mark Judge were sexually frustrated sex-obsessed dudes back in the day. And I think Kav didn't really settle down until his 40s...right around the time God punishes some men with ED.

And yet, it is clear from Senate released emails that Kavanaugh was still getting black-out drunk in his 30's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, TV people, it’s BLAH-zee, BLAH-zee, BLAH-zee!

What's BLAH-zee?

Her last name’s pronunciation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Ya, I am always happy that my boyfriend was a member of Tits&Clits in college. So proud to have that association on the resume.

Even Ted Bundy had girlfriends that could write similar letters.

I'm embarrassed that I know these people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Ya, I am always happy that my boyfriend was a member of Tits&Clits in college. So proud to have that association on the resume.

I don't get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Ya, I am always happy that my boyfriend was a member of Tits&Clits in college. So proud to have that association on the resume.

I don't get it.

Do you not know what a tit is or a clit?

[Anonymous]

He has already lied under oath. He is unfit. Period.

[Anonymous]

Maybe it's the 'Mauras' he is respectful to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, TV people, it’s BLAH-zee, BLAH-zee, BLAH-zee!

What's BLAH-zee?

Her last name’s pronunciation.

Who?

[Anonymous]

Through the classic coupling of Republican male Senatorial prudishness and female Senatorial Democratic anti-male feminism, this nomination is ....cooked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He'll withdraw later this week, continuing to deny the allegations but not wanting to put his wife and daughter through it. Trump can then nominate someone new almost immediately. Plenty of time to confirm someone before January (in unlikely event GOP loses the Senate)

Liberals are disgusting - they are banking on that and it’s why they did it. It’s the hallmark of me too

In actuality the so-called hallmark of Me Too is that men can't stop raping women. You suggesting Me Too is strictly political is what is disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently, some of her psychological research is on repressed memories and false memories.

I am not surprised. At all.

Y'all are having a little trouble with the chicken/egg timeline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He'll withdraw later this week, continuing to deny the allegations but not wanting to put his wife and daughter through it. Trump can then nominate someone new almost immediately. Plenty of time to confirm someone before January (in unlikely event GOP loses the Senate)

Liberals are disgusting - they are banking on that and it’s why they did it. It’s the hallmark of me too

In actuality the so-called hallmark of Me Too is that men can't stop raping women. You suggesting Me Too is strictly political is what is disgusting.

Perhaps stop entitling your sons into feeling they can have what they want.

Look where it leads.....