Which Dem can win general election in 2020?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bloomberg is a registered Indepdent. There’s no way the Ds dump their own candidates in favor of him.

Not any more. He's a registered Democrat now. And Bloomberg has a net worth of FIFTY BILLION DOLLARS. Of course, that shouldn't matter, but it does. Bloomberg could sink billions of dollars into his own campaign. That is a huge advantage, at least until Citizens United is reversed.

[Anonymous]

He isn't viable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Once DACA can vote we got the lockdown!

Citizenship for Democratic voters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Bloomberg is one of a few people who have a chance to beat Trump. Never considered a team, but wow Klobuchar would be excellent. I agree that’s the best combo I’ve heard.

-Hillary fan who understands, more than ever, that we are so far from electing a woman president

You think two Jewish people could win in Trump’s America?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Socialist Michael Moore says Michelle Obama can beat Trump in 2020.

I've been telling you people, kid's school was a dishonest excuse why they stayed in Washington. They're never leaving this town!

Biden and Obama!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Michellle Obama and Beto
Biden and Beto
Biden and M. Obama!

[Anonymous]

No one over 70 years old, which rules out more than half the field.

[Anonymous]

Hmm, Beto/Biden sounds good to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Michellle Obama and Beto
Biden and Beto
Biden and M. Obama!

OMG...this would be the killer...if only MO agrees.

[Anonymous]

Biden is not a choice for me - he is a great guy -funny, pragmatic and probably liked by a lot of Whites...but has major optics flaws that would be exploited by GOP. He is also very old. I want younger people in decision making roles... especially women, POC (and possibly non-evangelical). Our decision making class is far too White Old Men heavy to make sane policies for all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden is not a choice for me - he is a great guy -funny, pragmatic and probably liked by a lot of Whites...but has major optics flaws that would be exploited by GOP. He is also very old. I want younger people in decision making roles... especially women, POC (and possibly non-evangelical). Our decision making class is far too White Old Men heavy to make sane policies for all.

If the other choice is Trump, then Biden would be the only choice.

I hear what you're saying. But, if you're going to let the perfect (your version of it) get in the way of what is better than what we have, we will have 4 more years of Trump. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden is not a choice for me - he is a great guy -funny, pragmatic and probably liked by a lot of Whites...but has major optics flaws that would be exploited by GOP. He is also very old. I want younger people in decision making roles... especially women, POC (and possibly non-evangelical). Our decision making class is far too White Old Men heavy to make sane policies for all.

Isn't the fact that he's "probably liked by a lot of Whites" a critical element needed to win the general election? What is wrong with "White Old Men" as long as they are making good decisions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden is not a choice for me - he is a great guy -funny, pragmatic and probably liked by a lot of Whites...but has major optics flaws that would be exploited by GOP. He is also very old. I want younger people in decision making roles... especially women, POC (and possibly non-evangelical). Our decision making class is far too White Old Men heavy to make sane policies for all.

If the other choice is Trump, then Biden would be the only choice.

I hear what you're saying. But, if you're going to let the perfect (your version of it) get in the way of what is better than what we have, we will have 4 more years of Trump. Period.

Okay - if Biden (or even a potato, for that matter) is the choice against Trump, I would vote against Trump. I am talking about country's leadership at this point without knowing who will win Democratic primary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden is not a choice for me - he is a great guy -funny, pragmatic and probably liked by a lot of Whites...but has major optics flaws that would be exploited by GOP. He is also very old. I want younger people in decision making roles... especially women, POC (and possibly non-evangelical). Our decision making class is far too White Old Men heavy to make sane policies for all.

Isn't the fact that he's "probably liked by a lot of Whites" a critical element needed to win the general election? What is wrong with "White Old Men" as long as they are making good decisions?

In my experience, White Old Men (WOM) have not made right policies for everyone. They have made policies and compromises that benefits White Old Men. They are more autocratic, selfish and narcissistic. So, if I have choice between a generic WOM and someone else, the other one wins a brownie point...of course I will scrutinize their policies before voting. But as a nation, it is my firm belief that, we need to move away from electing the WOM to progress as a nation where EVERYONE's "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" is weighed equally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Bloomberg is one of a few people who have a chance to beat Trump. Never considered a team, but wow Klobuchar would be excellent. I agree that’s the best combo I’ve heard.

-Hillary fan who understands, more than ever, that we are so far from electing a woman president

You think two Jewish people could win in Trump’s America?

Huh? Klobuchar is not Jewish.