Pray for Charlotte, NC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN’s Erin Burnett tweeted today that she had learned how many of those who were arrested at the protest last night in Charlotte, North Carolina, were from other states.

Charlotte police sergeant tells me 70% of ppl arrested last night had out of state ID: “these are not protestors, these are criminals”

— Erin Burnett (@ErinBurnett) September 22, 2016

This is enlightening.

They might as well be Trump campaign workers, because they are swinging North Carolina solidly to Trump.

Democrats don't need NC to win, dumb jock

Hahahahahahaha! Because everything else is so going in their favor?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN’s Erin Burnett tweeted today that she had learned how many of those who were arrested at the protest last night in Charlotte, North Carolina, were from other states.

Charlotte police sergeant tells me 70% of ppl arrested last night had out of state ID: “these are not protestors, these are criminals”

— Erin Burnett (@ErinBurnett) September 22, 2016

That would explain, at least in part, the difference in reaction between Charlotte and Tulsa.
The east coast is more populated than OK is - more outside agitators come to Charlotte.

There was a story that showed some of the same people at Ferguson was in Baltimore. Paid protesters/agitators? Now, a quick search gave up the following and I don't know much about the site so fwiw here it is.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Ferguson-Missouri-paid-protesters/2015/05/25/id/646587/

LOL, "I don't know much about the site". Do yourself a favor and keep it that way. Newsmax is essentially Trump on steroids. A complete racist mess.

Yes, it's on the opposite side of the aisle from CNN. Funny how that sometimes happens.

They are actually both on the same side of the aisle. Newsmax is just a few miles further to the right. I can't even think of a comparable left site and if there were one I wouldn't waste my time with it.

Just did a quick search on liberal sites

Daily Kos
Eschaton
Crooks And Liars
Buzzflash
Mother Jones
Counterpunch
Think Progress
Raw Story

I have seen links to Daily Kos and Mother Jones here. Never heard of the others

Those are leftish or liberal sites, but they are not extreme in the same sense as Newsmax. There is one leftist site that I would probably compare to Newsmax, but I can't think of its name at the moment. There is a guy in my Twitter feed who frequently links to it so if he does so again soon I post it here.

The sites that you list have ideological slants, but there are significant differences between those on the list. Several wouldn't even agree with each other. While these sites may have perspectives with which you disagree, they do try to stick to facts. Newsmax, on the other hand, doesn't appear to have any regard for facts and willingly publishes things that have no grounding in reality. Newsmax is even more extreme than Brietbart which is difficult to comprehend.

Ok already, I said it was a quick find. Guarantee I won't forget Newsmax now though. LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reporters saying the heavy smell of pot and booze is in the air.

If they're smoking pot then it should quell a lot of the violence. lol

Booze however is another story. It is an epidemic that no one talks about.

Marijuana can cause aggression - especially when coupled with other substances like alcohol.
http://learnaboutmarijuanawa.org/factsheets/aggression.htm

So these druggies need help to heal themselves?

[Anonymous]

HELLO, PEOPLE!

THE OFFICER IS BLACK, OK? WHAT THE HELL IS ALL THE RIOTING FOR??!??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:HELLO, PEOPLE!

THE OFFICER IS BLACK, OK? WHAT THE HELL IS ALL THE RIOTING FOR??!??

Someone upthread implied that the black officer might have become racist because he was under the influence of white racist cops. So even though a black cop did the killing, it's still the white man's fault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HELLO, PEOPLE!

THE OFFICER IS BLACK, OK? WHAT THE HELL IS ALL THE RIOTING FOR??!??

Someone upthread implied that the black officer might have become racist because he was under the influence of white racist cops. So even though a black cop did the killing, it's still the white man's fault.

No. what I said was, there are those who state that. I didn't imply it was true or that I believed it. And I think people say that because they have to fit it into their 'agenda'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HELLO, PEOPLE!

THE OFFICER IS BLACK, OK? WHAT THE HELL IS ALL THE RIOTING FOR??!??

Someone upthread implied that the black officer might have become racist because he was under the influence of white racist cops. So even though a black cop did the killing, it's still the white man's fault.

No. what I said was, there are those who state that. I didn't imply it was true or that I believed it. And I think people say that because they have to fit it into their 'agenda'.

My mistake, then....you weren't referring specifically to yourself. But the point is the same. While you do not necessarily think the black cop could "turn" racist due to white influence, there are those who do. And, in those cases, whites are still being blamed for the bad action of blacks.

[Anonymous]

Bringing out the National Guard last night seems to have worked. One needs to present a strong front to violent people. Weakness and "giving them space to destroy" (as was the Baltimore mayor's approach) doesn't work.

(And I could expand it more globally, too. Playing "nice-nice" with bullies simply emboldens them. Look at how Iran is behaving after Obama caved in on the Iranian deal.)

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HELLO, PEOPLE!

THE OFFICER IS BLACK, OK? WHAT THE HELL IS ALL THE RIOTING FOR??!??

Someone upthread implied that the black officer might have become racist because he was under the influence of white racist cops. So even though a black cop did the killing, it's still the white man's fault.

No. what I said was, there are those who state that. I didn't imply it was true or that I believed it. And I think people say that because they have to fit it into their 'agenda'.

My mistake, then....you weren't referring specifically to yourself. But the point is the same. While you do not necessarily think the black cop could "turn" racist due to white influence, there are those who do. And, in those cases, whites are still being blamed for the bad action of blacks.

The two of you are having a discussion of a point that neither one of you -- nor any other poster here for the matter -- actually made. I've heard of straw men arguments, but this is ridiculous. One person invents a straw man, another quotes that person, then they discuss it among themselves. How about we just stick to things that have actually been said by actual posters rather than the imaginary ones that speak to you through your dog?

[Anonymous]

Just because the police officer shooter in Charlotte was black doesn't mean there wasn't any racial overtones in his decision to shoot. I don't know know how any American can ignore the phenomena that black males, in a variety of situations, seem to be shot by police under circumstances where it seems t should have been a last resort but instead just became Plan B. If the civilian had been a white woman or Asian man, would the police just shot them. Lately we've had, all black males, been pulled over for expired tags who disclosed he had a legal open carry and was shot in front of his partner and child, been shot with their hands up as they were waiting for some side of roadside assistance, been shot when served a warrant, been shot when not responding to orders and he turned out to be autistic, etc. How many females or men of other races do you have these random circumstances just get shot when a police officer should have the training and support to try other alternatives to access and rectify the situation? Do police officers have, on average, more patience and more willingness to try harder to diffuse with nonblack males and females?

police, regardless of race, seem to have a fear and preconceived notion that black males, in particular larger (tall, etc.) are aggressive and are more likely to hurt the officer. The tension is there at the initial exchange, as soon as words are exchanged. I am white, but my BIL is a very dark black male, and my BFF is a 40 year old very muscular black man, and both of them have told me stories for years about this. It doesn't matter if the cop is black, it's a cop thing in general. They get pulled over for BS reasons all the time. Both are scared as hell to even get their license out their wallet.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HELLO, PEOPLE!

THE OFFICER IS BLACK, OK? WHAT THE HELL IS ALL THE RIOTING FOR??!??

Someone upthread implied that the black officer might have become racist because he was under the influence of white racist cops. So even though a black cop did the killing, it's still the white man's fault.

No. what I said was, there are those who state that. I didn't imply it was true or that I believed it. And I think people say that because they have to fit it into their 'agenda'.

My mistake, then....you weren't referring specifically to yourself. But the point is the same. While you do not necessarily think the black cop could "turn" racist due to white influence, there are those who do. And, in those cases, whites are still being blamed for the bad action of blacks.

The two of you are having a discussion of a point that neither one of you -- nor any other poster here for the matter -- actually made. I've heard of straw men arguments, but this is ridiculous. One person invents a straw man, another quotes that person, then they discuss it among themselves. How about we just stick to things that have actually been said by actual posters rather than the imaginary ones that speak to you through your dog?

What is really ridiculous is the riots alleging racism, given that THE OFFICER IS BLACK!

BLM is ridiculous. It's proven itself a purely anti-police movement. All lives matter!

[Anonymous]

^^^^ and Soros-funded. Think about that for a moment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^^ and Soros-funded. Think about that for a moment.

Ah-ha. That explains why BLM is so anti-Isrsael, accusing them of apartheid and whatnot. Soros is behind it. Now it's making sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HELLO, PEOPLE!

THE OFFICER IS BLACK, OK? WHAT THE HELL IS ALL THE RIOTING FOR??!??

Someone upthread implied that the black officer might have become racist because he was under the influence of white racist cops. So even though a black cop did the killing, it's still the white man's fault.

No. what I said was, there are those who state that. I didn't imply it was true or that I believed it. And I think people say that because they have to fit it into their 'agenda'.

My mistake, then....you weren't referring specifically to yourself. But the point is the same. While you do not necessarily think the black cop could "turn" racist due to white influence, there are those who do. And, in those cases, whites are still being blamed for the bad action of blacks.

The two of you are having a discussion of a point that neither one of you -- nor any other poster here for the matter -- actually made. I've heard of straw men arguments, but this is ridiculous. One person invents a straw man, another quotes that person, then they discuss it among themselves. How about we just stick to things that have actually been said by actual posters rather than the imaginary ones that speak to you through your dog?

What is really ridiculous is the riots alleging racism, given that THE OFFICER IS BLACK!

BLM is ridiculous. It's proven itself a purely anti-police movement. All lives matter!

BLM is setting back race relations two generations.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:The two of you are having a discussion of a point that neither one of you -- nor any other poster here for the matter -- actually made. I've heard of straw men arguments, but this is ridiculous. One person invents a straw man, another quotes that person, then they discuss it among themselves. How about we just stick to things that have actually been said by actual posters rather than the imaginary ones that speak to you through your dog?

Suggest moving this thread to the Pets forum.