I don't think that we, as parents, ARE accepting of poor behaviour. But teenagers have poorly developed impulse control. Biologically, they are bound to make bad decisions at one time or another, particularly under stress. So, the question we need to ask is whether the threat of deadly force, and the use of actual violent force, is a proportional response to "contempt of cop." |
stereotype much? |
Because "black babies" (aka 12-19 year olds) can do no wrong, and if they do it's because of racism. Sort of like the reverse "affluenza" dfense. It is wrong and when these ill behaved kids grow up with a sense of entitlement and disregard for the law and the greater good of society, we are all in trouble. |
If the officer hadn't barrel-rolled his way in, escalating the situation and demonstrating a complete inability to perform the public service for which we pay him, we could discuss this. Start a new thread if you want to debate the dawning of rowdy and disrespectful young teens. |
Lady, you are truly demanding. But, OK, here it goes: 28th amendment: No person of the female gender and of color, between the ages of 8 and 18, wearing a bikini and shouting for her mama to help, shall ever be arrested, or touched. Authorities will ensure that every police car, motorbike, bike, boat and horse carries 1. an assortment of well-fitting clothes, in multiple colors, styles and sizes, and 2. videoconference equipment, with every mama in the country in speed dial, for any said person of the female gender and of color wearing a bikini and shouting for her mama to help to select and dress up, and discuss matters with her mama, before being arrested or touched. (My DAUGHTERS are not white. And they have no problem dealing with the police, or with "supposed" friends. They know their behavior matters. They don't trespass other people's properties, jump over fences, engage in physical altercations with neighbors, or ignore police requests. If some other "supposed" friends cancel an invitation, they play with someone else. We are not drama people) |
OH MY GOODNESS! Seriously, Seriously? They speak well, and there is a place that a lot of AA live and there is a lot of crime there, therefore AA's and/or AA's of a a certain class are prone to criminality?just WOW! I seriously doubt that you know how stupid you sound. |
Really? Now it's cultural? You really think AA teach our children to be disrespectful? Some of you need to just stop talking. And our money is obtained "unlawfully" ? What does does that mean? And what are "Ghetto" kids? Are they only AA kids? Can white, asian and other groups have "Ghetto" kids? If some were invited and had passes, what laws did they break? How were they acting unlawfully? If they were invited and had passes, they probably thought "Hey I was invited, why are you kicking me out?" |
truly sick. |
DA FUQ are you talking about? 1) What behaviour was disrespectful? Her saying something smart to the cop? OK-- that's not illegal 2) What behaviour was disrespectful? The girl was complying with the orders given by the cop, she was leaving! 3) People have not been saying that if there was disrespectful behaviour that it is ok, they are just saying that white kids (EVEN WHITE KIDS SEEN IN THE VIDEO AND MAKING THE VIDEO) were treated radically different than the AA kids. 4) It's a group of a lot of kids, there is no way for any of us to know who was had a legitimate invite and who did not |
Oh, those 14-year olds... |
Must be the dumbest ass assertion I have read here all day. Throwing out these generalization instead of actually sticking to facts is a weak way to make a non-existent point. |
I agree, what you say is real and sad. I have no idea if it is related to the "acting white" or "no snitching" BS, but that culture is corrosive. And the saddest thing, to me, is that many (apparently AA) posters in this thread are justifying their behavior. Everything the kids did and said is normal course of business--what else can you expect from a bunch of teenagers! |
One would think that money, nice homes, nice community, good education, careers, and other opportunities that are not afforded to those less fortunate would help dissuade "thug" like behavior, and disregard for rules and laws, as well as utter disrespect for authority. It does not seem to matter as theis behavior apparently crosses socioeconomic and class lines. I was once at a conference and a PHD level, well to do, well respected man in a high level job was talking shit about racism with such anger and venom that the tension in the room was palpable. He was full of rage, yet he seemingly was living the good life and had every opportunity at his disposal. Instead of using it for good, he was using it as a platform to spew hatred against the "white man". There is a problem with this....... |
No one said anything you asserted. I hate to tell you, but that whole "acting white" thing is a cultural misnomer that has been dispelled. There have been studies that show that that whole idea is no more prevalent among black kids than the parallel idea of calling someone a "nerd", in other words, it's the same difference and doesn't happen to black kids more than white kids. And I've been black all my life and no one has ever told me to stop "snitching". If you have a problem with poor behaviour, then why don't you go to Indiana give a piece of your mind to those woman brawling in the Walmart. |
No, in fact that is actual research on this: http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2014/03/black-boys-older.aspx lack boys as young as 10 may not be viewed in the same light of childhood innocence as their white peers, but are instead more likely to be mistaken as older, be perceived as guilty and face police violence if accused of a crime, according to new research published by the American Psychological Association. “Children in most societies are considered to be in a distinct group with characteristics such as innocence and the need for protection. Our research found that black boys can be seen as responsible for their actions at an age when white boys still benefit from the assumption that children are essentially innocent,” said author Phillip Atiba Goff, PhD, of the University of California, Los Angeles. The study was published online in APA’s Journal of Personality and Social Psychology®. |