Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
We don't want her to be the 'next Paul McCartney. Many of his solo songs are really bad...way worse than Taylor! Bang bang Maxwell silver hammer? Yikes! |
So she gets help. Big whoop. Still made 2 billion on the Eras tour. And you? |
That’s not a solo song. Methinks you know very little about McCartney. |
Seems to me it’s a big whoop, considering you’re all calling me sexist for pointing it out — which I only did to correct posters who said she writes her songs on her own. |
Don’t believe me. Watch this, from a producer and music industry expert: https://youtu.be/DxrwjJHXPlQ?si=k5HjT1tuek715aJN Start at 2:30 for his discussion of what I’m talking about. |
Okay, and……?! She does seem to be heavily involved in the music as well. So because she’s not doing everything by herself tip to tail, she’s somehow some kind of sham? FFS, Elton John and Bernie Taupin did their best work in collab, but Elton still got most of the glory. |
Some people--maybe you?--seem to have a problem with her being referred to as a songwriter. First it was that she can't be considered a songwriter--even if she writes her own songs--because she gets a lot of help and doesn't credit anyone else on her songs. That changed too: well, she does give credit to others but she acts like she does it all herself. And now we've reached: well, maybe she writes the lyrics, but not the MUSIC, so she's not a songwriter or at least not AS MUCH of one. So you can see how these argument sound specious. |
That's not what people were saying. Try to keep up. |
Can you read music? If so, google the sheet music for Fortnite. OMG she uses the same note for almost 2 measures. The Same note over and over. The repetition within her song continues in the same way. Then google another singer (an Adele, the Beatles) and notice how the notes change within and across measures. Hers don’t. She sort of hangs onto a note until she has finished all the words in her phrase and then will move to a new note. My only music training I have is at crap violin in 4th grade, but I know the notes are supposed to rise and lower on the sheet music. More than just the lyrics need to change to make a good melody. She doesn’t do that and so it bores me. Where is the song? |
I have no problem with her being a songwriter. I’m simply pointing out that they are too, because they write all the instrumental parts. |
Yes. They were a songwriting duo. If Taylor openly called herself part of a Swift/Martin/Shellback songwriting trio I’d have no problem with it. Is that happening? |
| We grew up in the heavy metal and punk era; of course we find it bland. But I like some of her stuff in the same way I like smooth jazz and ballads from the 70s. |
Some 70s ballads I totally agree are as bland as her music. But Bridge Over Troubled Water is a goddamn masterpiece. The chord progression in that song is genius. |
I also think part of the issue here is that it's unclear how much Taylor is actually sitting down in studio and collaborating with her songwriting partners. The allegation is that she is out touring and being sent essentially backing tracks that she will then lay lyrics and melody over. Yes that is a form of collaboration. But it's very unidirectional and therefore distinct from other very fruitful collaborations like Elton John and Taupin or the Beatles where there was greater give and take and they were spending significant amounts of time just sitting in studio playing snippets of melodies or piano or guitar riffs or toying around with lyrical phrase and then building off one another. If you have not seen the Beatles documentary showing them writing and recording their final album I highly recommend it. It's not even the best example of their collaboration because at this point the band was essentially already breaking apart with side projects and interests. Yet even with a lot of turmoil over how much longer the collaboration would hold together they fall easily back into their collaborative rhythms and it is really fascinating to watch them toy with what are now incredibly famous songs and work very productively together towards building those songs from their component parts often starting with a small bit of writing or inspiration one of them brings to the table and then all four of them working together to build it into a song. Although Paul and John drive the collaboration process George and Ringo (but especially George) are full partners and providing generative ideas and energy. They all bring something so different to the table and it's their difference that seem to make those songs great. They make each other better. In the kind of unidirectional collaboration Taylor uses it's less generative. I also suspect that one reason the backing tracks she is using are so often very simple is that it makes it easier for her -- she is a proficient musician but not much more. She needs tracks that she can easily reproduce on the piano or guitar as she writes lyrics to them. And she's not riffing on these tracks or changing them. Once she has the lyrics her producers are then toying with her melody and adding some complexity to the songs but because of the lack of back and forth it's not moving into that level of generation you see with the Beatles. She is making no substantive changes to the backing track provided. The producers are largely leaving the lyrics to her and only building melody and arrangement around them. I think this is why her music often sounds so flat and unsurprising even if her lyrics sometimes have creative twists and turns. Because she's essentially writing a poem to go with a song someone else is writing. But they aren't working together. |
This is exactly right. And my issue with comparing this to songwriting duos is not only the active collaboration they have/had but the fact that they all openly acknowledged and celebrated the whole thing. Taylor says she works with producers, but I’m not aware of her acknowledging that they write the music to back up her lyrics. |