IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What do his Constitutional oversight responsibilities have to do with releasing this document to the public? A stupid tweet to cover for a politically-motivated hit job. If he wants to spend his last years doing MAGA nonsense, it's his legacy I guess...

grassley needs to be on the other side of the grass PRONTO!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What do his Constitutional oversight responsibilities have to do with releasing this document to the public? A stupid tweet to cover for a politically-motivated hit job. If he wants to spend his last years doing MAGA nonsense, it's his legacy I guess...

grassley needs to be on the other side of the grass PRONTO!

Translation: He is effective and that makes us BIG MAD!

[Anonymous]

Tax evasion should be prosecuted. But why do Republicans only want Democrats prosecuted?! Why did they cut funding to the IRS for investigations?! The problem with the whole stage show of outrage is Republicans are logically inconsistent and therefore disingenuous. But it working on getting their brainwashed base all worked up. Just look at the comments here. It’s a side show of morons supporting and defending the House Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tax evasion should be prosecuted. But why do Republicans only want Democrats prosecuted?! Why did they cut funding to the IRS for investigations?! The problem with the whole stage show of outrage is Republicans are logically inconsistent and therefore disingenuous. But it working on getting their brainwashed base all worked up. Just look at the comments here. It’s a side show of morons supporting and defending the House Republicans.

Why don't the Republicans care about Trump's tax fraud? We found out from the New York AG case that Trump was keeping two sets of books telling a widely different set of stories about his income. That's tax fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tax evasion should be prosecuted. But why do Republicans only want Democrats prosecuted?! Why did they cut funding to the IRS for investigations?! The problem with the whole stage show of outrage is Republicans are logically inconsistent and therefore disingenuous. But it working on getting their brainwashed base all worked up. Just look at the comments here. It’s a side show of morons supporting and defending the House Republicans.

Why don't the Republicans care about Trump's tax fraud? We found out from the New York AG case that Trump was keeping two sets of books telling a widely different set of stories about his income. That's tax fraud.

You people are insane! Every real estate investor keeps two sets of books, which is completely legal as it pertains to carried interest. Once agan, Trump's tax returns are public and nothing illegal or criminal came from it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tax evasion should be prosecuted. But why do Republicans only want Democrats prosecuted?! Why did they cut funding to the IRS for investigations?! The problem with the whole stage show of outrage is Republicans are logically inconsistent and therefore disingenuous. But it working on getting their brainwashed base all worked up. Just look at the comments here. It’s a side show of morons supporting and defending the House Republicans.

Why don't the Republicans care about Trump's tax fraud? We found out from the New York AG case that Trump was keeping two sets of books telling a widely different set of stories about his income. That's tax fraud.

You people are insane! Every real estate investor keeps two sets of books, which is completely legal as it pertains to carried interest. Once agan, Trump's tax returns are public and nothing illegal or criminal came from it.

LOL, no, that isn't what happened here. I love the pretzels Trump cultists contort themselves into to justify his illegal behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tax evasion should be prosecuted. But why do Republicans only want Democrats prosecuted?! Why did they cut funding to the IRS for investigations?! The problem with the whole stage show of outrage is Republicans are logically inconsistent and therefore disingenuous. But it working on getting their brainwashed base all worked up. Just look at the comments here. It’s a side show of morons supporting and defending the House Republicans.

Why don't the Republicans care about Trump's tax fraud? We found out from the New York AG case that Trump was keeping two sets of books telling a widely different set of stories about his income. That's tax fraud.

You people are insane! Every real estate investor keeps two sets of books, which is completely legal as it pertains to carried interest. Once agan, Trump's tax returns are public and nothing illegal or criminal came from it.

Really?

https://www.npr.org/2022/12/06/1140756394/former-president-donald-trumps-company-found-guilty-criminal-tax-fraud

[Anonymous]

Nothingburger!

[Anonymous]

Someone doesnt understand depreciation and amortization. DCUM never fails, yet back to Hunter taking money from Ukraine via a loan from China to avoid taxes. Completely legal but crickets....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Because there is nothing remotely illegal in it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Because there is nothing remotely illegal in it?

Then why was Ziegler blocked from being allowed to interview her? Something is fishy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Because there is nothing remotely illegal in it?

Then why was Ziegler blocked from being allowed to interview her? Something is fishy.

There was no probable cause of a crime. Why would they interview her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Because there is nothing remotely illegal in it?

Then why was Ziegler blocked from being allowed to interview her? Something is fishy.

There was no probable cause of a crime. Why would they interview her?

They need to find some criminal activity. So they will bring in anyone associated with Biden.

Show me the man, and I’ll show you the crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Because there is nothing remotely illegal in it?

Then why was Ziegler blocked from being allowed to interview her? Something is fishy.

There was no justifiable reason to interview her. None. The fact that this investigation started under Trump should be the tell, but the Trump supporters are too wound into the rabbit hole to figure it out.