IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

Nobody here has ever said the laptop wasn't Hunter Biden's. Not sure why you people INSIST on repeatedly bringing that up, along with overbroad and general statements like "the laptop is real." OF COURSE it was once his and OF COURSE it was a real laptop. Those are stupid points to keep making over and over again.

But again, what has NEVER been publicly established is whether every single piece, 100% of the alleged content is actually Hunter's, and whether it has not been tampered with. Even if the FBI got it directly from the computer shop guy we don't know whether he or anyone else tampered with it after Hunter dropped it off. The images made from it DEFINITELY DO show tampering. That is also indisputable. Whether the FBI one shows tampering is a different question, but again, Trump's own DoJ was in charge of the case when the laptop came into FBI custody. Why would Barr have the laptop covered up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The judge should absolutely NOT accept the plea deal.

A special prosecutor needs to be appointed and this whole scandal needs to be thoroughly investigated.

Garland needs to get out of the way.

Garland isn't in the way. This has been Weiss's call from the get go.

You are just upset that the facts don't support the allegations.

He should have appointed a special council from the get go.
When the son of the sitting president to whom he reports is being investigated, it SCREAMS special council.
But, he didn't. Because he knew special councils have authority that an attorney in Delaware doesn't.

The investigation started before Biden was president. You would have been screaming bloody murder at the headline that Biden replaced the prosecutor on the case, no?

[Anonymous]

So I guess the GOP doesn't really want to investigate the 1023.

I wonder if the PP(s) who were frothing about the information in the 1023 for the past 5 pages understand how badly they have been played.

[Anonymous]

You can believe Fox (I have hundreds of millions of dollars confirming I am a lair) News in the same vein as Seth Rich and Pizzagate, or, you can believe the guy who will likely spend some time in jail for manufacturing the conspiracy in the first place.

Don't say you haven't been warned when this one doesn't pan out either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

Nobody here has ever said the laptop wasn't Hunter Biden's. Not sure why you people INSIST on repeatedly bringing that up, along with overbroad and general statements like "the laptop is real." OF COURSE it was once his and OF COURSE it was a real laptop. Those are stupid points to keep making over and over again.

But again, what has NEVER been publicly established is whether every single piece, 100% of the alleged content is actually Hunter's, and whether it has not been tampered with. Even if the FBI got it directly from the computer shop guy we don't know whether he or anyone else tampered with it after Hunter dropped it off. The images made from it DEFINITELY DO show tampering. That is also indisputable. Whether the FBI one shows tampering is a different question, but again, Trump's own DoJ was in charge of the case when the laptop came into FBI custody. Why would Barr have the laptop covered up?

BS.
Even Biden advanced the lie....

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

In November 2022, CBS News published a forensic analysis it commissioned, which examined a "clean" copy of the data obtained directly from the repair shop operator. That analysis concluded that the "clean" data, including over 120,000 emails, originated with Hunter Biden and had not been altered.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-data-analysis/

Data from a laptop that the lawyer for a Delaware computer repair shop owner says was left by Hunter Biden in 2019 – and which the shop owner later provided to the FBI under subpoena – shows no evidence of tampering or fabrication, according to an independent review commissioned by CBS News.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In November 2022, CBS News published a forensic analysis it commissioned, which examined a "clean" copy of the data obtained directly from the repair shop operator. That analysis concluded that the "clean" data, including over 120,000 emails, originated with Hunter Biden and had not been altered.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-data-analysis/

Data from a laptop that the lawyer for a Delaware computer repair shop owner says was left by Hunter Biden in 2019 – and which the shop owner later provided to the FBI under subpoena – shows no evidence of tampering or fabrication, according to an independent review commissioned by CBS News.

And is there any evidence from this pre-tampered with laptop that actually has any teeth? No, there’s not. Maybe you should read the articles you post before posting them.

“Two of Hunter's former business partners, including Tony Bobulinski, who received the email, have told CBS News that "10 held by H for the big guy?" is shorthand for 10% held by Hunter for his father.

But when the email became public in 2020, the author, James Gilliar, told the Wall Street Journal that Joe Biden was not involved. Gilliar has not responded to CBS News' questions.

Bobulinski had a falling out with Hunter Biden, and has been a critic of the president and his son. His appearance and interview on Fox News came on the heels of the initial reports in the New York Post about the laptop.” Oh there it is, more right wing cray, this time with the added frisson of a disgruntled ex business partner. No way that guy’s spinning the story!

It is a great article that effectively argues what wastes of space Republicans are as lawmakers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You can believe Fox (I have hundreds of millions of dollars confirming I am a lair) News in the same vein as Seth Rich and Pizzagate, or, you can believe the guy who will likely spend some time in jail for manufacturing the conspiracy in the first place.

Don't say you haven't been warned when this one doesn't pan out either.

They won’t notice or care. Like the robots they are, they’ll begin memorizing all the names of people who don’t matter and will regurgitate all the super meaningless garbage that they’re told is the most important thing in the world. Then they’ll be on the next thing. None of it matters. They’re just trying to harass Biden. Why? Because the GOP is populated solely by certifiable psychopaths and sadists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Boy howdy, you want to talk about non functional octogenarians, here’s exhibit A.

[Anonymous]

Let’s face it, this stinks to heaven.

We need Newsom to run. Biden is old and tarnished.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

What do his Constitutional oversight responsibilities have to do with releasing this document to the public? A stupid tweet to cover for a politically-motivated hit job. If he wants to spend his last years doing MAGA nonsense, it's his legacy I guess...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The person who was going to run the Senate on 1/6 until Pence grew a spine says what? Grassley has huge problems of his own.

[Anonymous]

Pathetic