IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

I am old enough to remember when the GOP castigated whistleblowers who raised awareness of Trump's "perfect" phone call and extortion of the Ukrainian president.

Now, the GOP likes whistleblowers. It causes whiplash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am old enough to remember when the GOP castigated whistleblowers who raised awareness of Trump's "perfect" phone call and extortion of the Ukrainian president.

Now, the GOP likes whistleblowers. It causes whiplash.

I'm old enough to remember when Edward Snowden was a hero of the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

Nobody here has ever said the laptop wasn't Hunter Biden's. Not sure why you people INSIST on repeatedly bringing that up, along with overbroad and general statements like "the laptop is real." OF COURSE it was once his and OF COURSE it was a real laptop. Those are stupid points to keep making over and over again.

But again, what has NEVER been publicly established is whether every single piece, 100% of the alleged content is actually Hunter's, and whether it has not been tampered with. Even if the FBI got it directly from the computer shop guy we don't know whether he or anyone else tampered with it after Hunter dropped it off. The images made from it DEFINITELY DO show tampering. That is also indisputable. Whether the FBI one shows tampering is a different question, but again, Trump's own DoJ was in charge of the case when the laptop came into FBI custody. Why would Barr have the laptop covered up?

Computer experts can definitely figure out if the laptop has been tampered with. People try to do that kind of stuff all the time. They don’t get away with it. Even if they delete stuff- it can be found.

What has been tampered with on the laptop? links, citations, reputable sources, because just saying the laptop has been “tampered with” means nothing.

WaPo and CBS had copies of the hard drive examined independently and didn’t find evidence of tampering.

The huge amount of emails, photos, and details concerning HB and family found on the laptop- you’d have to be deep in denial that wasn’t his and wasn’t authentic. Does anyone else think the guy has serious drug, sex, and personality and mental disorders? I get everyone is dealing with issues and his mom and brother died- but lots of people deal with the death of their parent and sibling while they are in poverty and without the support and love of family as Hunter has been blessed with his entire life. The photos from the laptop are extremely disturbing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am old enough to remember when the GOP castigated whistleblowers who raised awareness of Trump's "perfect" phone call and extortion of the Ukrainian president.

Now, the GOP likes whistleblowers. It causes whiplash.

I'm old enough to remember when Edward Snowden was a hero of the left.

Nope. He was and is a spy. He should be spending the rest of his life in a federal prison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

Nobody here has ever said the laptop wasn't Hunter Biden's. Not sure why you people INSIST on repeatedly bringing that up, along with overbroad and general statements like "the laptop is real." OF COURSE it was once his and OF COURSE it was a real laptop. Those are stupid points to keep making over and over again.

But again, what has NEVER been publicly established is whether every single piece, 100% of the alleged content is actually Hunter's, and whether it has not been tampered with. Even if the FBI got it directly from the computer shop guy we don't know whether he or anyone else tampered with it after Hunter dropped it off. The images made from it DEFINITELY DO show tampering. That is also indisputable. Whether the FBI one shows tampering is a different question, but again, Trump's own DoJ was in charge of the case when the laptop came into FBI custody. Why would Barr have the laptop covered up?

Computer experts can definitely figure out if the laptop has been tampered with. People try to do that kind of stuff all the time. They don’t get away with it. Even if they delete stuff- it can be found.

What has been tampered with on the laptop? links, citations, reputable sources, because just saying the laptop has been “tampered with” means nothing.

WaPo and CBS had copies of the hard drive examined independently and didn’t find evidence of tampering.

The huge amount of emails, photos, and details concerning HB and family found on the laptop- you’d have to be deep in denial that wasn’t his and wasn’t authentic. Does anyone else think the guy has serious drug, sex, and personality and mental disorders? I get everyone is dealing with issues and his mom and brother died- but lots of people deal with the death of their parent and sibling while they are in poverty and without the support and love of family as Hunter has been blessed with his entire life. The photos from the laptop are extremely disturbing.

Two forensic analysts who independently examined the data for The Washington Post authenticated 1,828 and 22,000 emails, respectively, of the almost 129,000 emails on the hard drive in 2022. Neither analyst could verify the vast majority of the data, nor could they find clear evidence of tampering but they note "key pieces of evidence useful in discovering tampering were not available." In some cases, The Post matched content to other sources "that the experts were not able to assess". The unverifiable emails included some prominently reported previously by other news outlets. The analysis found that people other than Hunter Biden had created six new folders on the drive over a week after the original report by the New York Post and months after the laptop had been taken into FBI custody. It also found that data had been accessed and copied off the drive by people other than Hunter Biden over the course of nearly three years

So the WP could not verify the laptop had been tempered with because key information had been removed- ie someone tampered with the laptop. Also WP could only authenticate under 8% of the laptops content. They did prove that the laptop had been accessed, files added and copies made after it was stolen. Conclusion laptop is fake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am old enough to remember when the GOP castigated whistleblowers who raised awareness of Trump's "perfect" phone call and extortion of the Ukrainian president.

Now, the GOP likes whistleblowers. It causes whiplash.

I'm old enough to remember when Edward Snowden was a hero of the left.

Nope. He was and is a spy. He should be spending the rest of his life in a federal prison.

It's so refreshing to have leftists express contempt for traitors. So much has changed... https://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-pelosi-spying-edward-snowden-20140124-story.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

Nobody here has ever said the laptop wasn't Hunter Biden's. Not sure why you people INSIST on repeatedly bringing that up, along with overbroad and general statements like "the laptop is real." OF COURSE it was once his and OF COURSE it was a real laptop. Those are stupid points to keep making over and over again.

But again, what has NEVER been publicly established is whether every single piece, 100% of the alleged content is actually Hunter's, and whether it has not been tampered with. Even if the FBI got it directly from the computer shop guy we don't know whether he or anyone else tampered with it after Hunter dropped it off. The images made from it DEFINITELY DO show tampering. That is also indisputable. Whether the FBI one shows tampering is a different question, but again, Trump's own DoJ was in charge of the case when the laptop came into FBI custody. Why would Barr have the laptop covered up?

Computer experts can definitely figure out if the laptop has been tampered with. People try to do that kind of stuff all the time. They don’t get away with it. Even if they delete stuff- it can be found.

What has been tampered with on the laptop? links, citations, reputable sources, because just saying the laptop has been “tampered with” means nothing.

WaPo and CBS had copies of the hard drive examined independently and didn’t find evidence of tampering.

The huge amount of emails, photos, and details concerning HB and family found on the laptop- you’d have to be deep in denial that wasn’t his and wasn’t authentic. Does anyone else think the guy has serious drug, sex, and personality and mental disorders? I get everyone is dealing with issues and his mom and brother died- but lots of people deal with the death of their parent and sibling while they are in poverty and without the support and love of family as Hunter has been blessed with his entire life. The photos from the laptop are extremely disturbing.

Two forensic analysts who independently examined the data for The Washington Post authenticated 1,828 and 22,000 emails, respectively, of the almost 129,000 emails on the hard drive in 2022. Neither analyst could verify the vast majority of the data, nor could they find clear evidence of tampering but they note "key pieces of evidence useful in discovering tampering were not available." In some cases, The Post matched content to other sources "that the experts were not able to assess". The unverifiable emails included some prominently reported previously by other news outlets. The analysis found that people other than Hunter Biden had created six new folders on the drive over a week after the original report by the New York Post and months after the laptop had been taken into FBI custody. It also found that data had been accessed and copied off the drive by people other than Hunter Biden over the course of nearly three years

So the WP could not verify the laptop had been tempered with because key information had been removed- ie someone tampered with the laptop. Also WP could only authenticate under 8% of the laptops content. They did prove that the laptop had been accessed, files added and copies made after it was stolen. Conclusion laptop is fake.

So you expect your conclusion as an anonymous online poster to settle the issue? lol, no.

Your opinion doesn’t mean anything, except for what you are entitled to believe.

“Data from a laptop that the lawyer for a Delaware computer repair shop owner says was left by Hunter Biden in 2019 – and which the shop owner later provided to the FBI under subpoena – shows no evidence of tampering or fabrication, according to an independent review commissioned by CBS News.

The independent analysis, by two cyber investigators from Minneapolis-based Computer Forensics Services, found no evidence that the user data had been modified, fabricated or tampered with. Nor did it find any new files originating after April 2019, when store records indicate Biden dropped it off for repair.”

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-data-analysis/

“A senior FBI official told Twitter that Hunter Biden’s laptop was real and not Russian disinformation on the day the social-media company censored a New York Post story relying on emails from that laptop.

Laura Dehmlow, the now-section chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF), confirmed in a closed-door deposition that when Twitter asked whether the laptop was real, an official said: “Yes, it was.” An FBI lawyer on the call then promptly jumped in and said: “No further comment.” According to Dehmlow, internal deliberations were held after that call in which the decision was made that FITF would say “no comment” going forward.“

[Anonymous]

Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation

July 20, 2023
Press Release
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation.

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/testimony-reveals-fbi-employees-who-warned-social-media-companies-about-hack

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation

July 20, 2023
Press Release
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation.

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/testimony-reveals-fbi-employees-who-warned-social-media-companies-about-hack

There’s a thread for that here https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1145261.page

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation

July 20, 2023
Press Release
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation.

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/testimony-reveals-fbi-employees-who-warned-social-media-companies-about-hack

It was orchestrated by Lev Parnas, Rudy Guiliani, Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGenova...literally Russian disinformation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation

July 20, 2023
Press Release
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation.

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/testimony-reveals-fbi-employees-who-warned-social-media-companies-about-hack

It was orchestrated by Lev Parnas, Rudy Guiliani, Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGenova...literally Russian disinformation.

And you have not a single credible source to link to that shows that is accurate. Why do people make claims like you are doing without a single credible source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

Nobody here has ever said the laptop wasn't Hunter Biden's. Not sure why you people INSIST on repeatedly bringing that up, along with overbroad and general statements like "the laptop is real." OF COURSE it was once his and OF COURSE it was a real laptop. Those are stupid points to keep making over and over again.

But again, what has NEVER been publicly established is whether every single piece, 100% of the alleged content is actually Hunter's, and whether it has not been tampered with. Even if the FBI got it directly from the computer shop guy we don't know whether he or anyone else tampered with it after Hunter dropped it off. The images made from it DEFINITELY DO show tampering. That is also indisputable. Whether the FBI one shows tampering is a different question, but again, Trump's own DoJ was in charge of the case when the laptop came into FBI custody. Why would Barr have the laptop covered up?

Computer experts can definitely figure out if the laptop has been tampered with. People try to do that kind of stuff all the time. They don’t get away with it. Even if they delete stuff- it can be found.

What has been tampered with on the laptop? links, citations, reputable sources, because just saying the laptop has been “tampered with” means nothing.

WaPo and CBS had copies of the hard drive examined independently and didn’t find evidence of tampering.

The huge amount of emails, photos, and details concerning HB and family found on the laptop- you’d have to be deep in denial that wasn’t his and wasn’t authentic. Does anyone else think the guy has serious drug, sex, and personality and mental disorders? I get everyone is dealing with issues and his mom and brother died- but lots of people deal with the death of their parent and sibling while they are in poverty and without the support and love of family as Hunter has been blessed with his entire life. The photos from the laptop are extremely disturbing.

Two forensic analysts who independently examined the data for The Washington Post authenticated 1,828 and 22,000 emails, respectively, of the almost 129,000 emails on the hard drive in 2022. Neither analyst could verify the vast majority of the data, nor could they find clear evidence of tampering but they note "key pieces of evidence useful in discovering tampering were not available." In some cases, The Post matched content to other sources "that the experts were not able to assess". The unverifiable emails included some prominently reported previously by other news outlets. The analysis found that people other than Hunter Biden had created six new folders on the drive over a week after the original report by the New York Post and months after the laptop had been taken into FBI custody. It also found that data had been accessed and copied off the drive by people other than Hunter Biden over the course of nearly three years

So the WP could not verify the laptop had been tempered with because key information had been removed- ie someone tampered with the laptop. Also WP could only authenticate under 8% of the laptops content. They did prove that the laptop had been accessed, files added and copies made after it was stolen. Conclusion laptop is fake.

So you expect your conclusion as an anonymous online poster to settle the issue? lol, no.

Your opinion doesn’t mean anything, except for what you are entitled to believe.

“Data from a laptop that the lawyer for a Delaware computer repair shop owner says was left by Hunter Biden in 2019 – and which the shop owner later provided to the FBI under subpoena – shows no evidence of tampering or fabrication, according to an independent review commissioned by CBS News.

The independent analysis, by two cyber investigators from Minneapolis-based Computer Forensics Services, found no evidence that the user data had been modified, fabricated or tampered with. Nor did it find any new files originating after April 2019, when store records indicate Biden dropped it off for repair.”

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-data-analysis/

“A senior FBI official told Twitter that Hunter Biden’s laptop was real and not Russian disinformation on the day the social-media company censored a New York Post story relying on emails from that laptop.

Laura Dehmlow, the now-section chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF), confirmed in a closed-door deposition that when Twitter asked whether the laptop was real, an official said: “Yes, it was.” An FBI lawyer on the call then promptly jumped in and said: “No further comment.” According to Dehmlow, internal deliberations were held after that call in which the decision was made that FITF would say “no comment” going forward.“

Do you guys even read your own threads?

As I posted on page 21, just two pages ago (three if this post starts a new page) I response to your same inane CbS sAyS iT wAs ReAl post:

And is there any evidence from this pre-tampered with laptop that actually has any teeth? No, there’s not. Maybe you should read the articles you post before posting them.

““Two of Hunter's former business partners, including Tony Bobulinski, who received the email, have told CBS News that "10 held by H for the big guy?" is shorthand for 10% held by Hunter for his father.

But when the email became public in 2020, the author, James Gilliar, told the Wall Street Journal that Joe Biden was not involved. Gilliar has not responded to CBS News' questions.

Bobulinski had a falling out with Hunter Biden, and has been a critic of the president and his son. His appearance and interview on Fox News came on the heels of the initial reports in the New York Post about the laptop.” Oh there it is, more right wing cray, this time with the added frisson of a disgruntled ex business partner. No way that guy’s spinning the story! […]”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.

Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!

You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.

Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/

The sources you posted are not results of the FBI examining the data on Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI admits now they knew in 2020 November the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. They haven’t released any information about any analysis of the data on the laptop. They definitely would know if the laptop had been tampered with and information added to the laptop. That’s their specialty. The FBI has not said that at all.

Nobody here has ever said the laptop wasn't Hunter Biden's. Not sure why you people INSIST on repeatedly bringing that up, along with overbroad and general statements like "the laptop is real." OF COURSE it was once his and OF COURSE it was a real laptop. Those are stupid points to keep making over and over again.

But again, what has NEVER been publicly established is whether every single piece, 100% of the alleged content is actually Hunter's, and whether it has not been tampered with. Even if the FBI got it directly from the computer shop guy we don't know whether he or anyone else tampered with it after Hunter dropped it off. The images made from it DEFINITELY DO show tampering. That is also indisputable. Whether the FBI one shows tampering is a different question, but again, Trump's own DoJ was in charge of the case when the laptop came into FBI custody. Why would Barr have the laptop covered up?

Computer experts can definitely figure out if the laptop has been tampered with. People try to do that kind of stuff all the time. They don’t get away with it. Even if they delete stuff- it can be found.

What has been tampered with on the laptop? links, citations, reputable sources, because just saying the laptop has been “tampered with” means nothing.

WaPo and CBS had copies of the hard drive examined independently and didn’t find evidence of tampering.

The huge amount of emails, photos, and details concerning HB and family found on the laptop- you’d have to be deep in denial that wasn’t his and wasn’t authentic. Does anyone else think the guy has serious drug, sex, and personality and mental disorders? I get everyone is dealing with issues and his mom and brother died- but lots of people deal with the death of their parent and sibling while they are in poverty and without the support and love of family as Hunter has been blessed with his entire life. The photos from the laptop are extremely disturbing.

Untrue. WaPo said their findings were inconclusive.

Among the reasons for the inconclusive findings was sloppy handling of the data, which damaged some records. The experts found the data had been repeatedly accessed and copied by people other than Hunter Biden over nearly three years. The MacBook itself is now in the hands of the FBI, which is investigating whether Hunter Biden properly reported income from business dealings.

Most of the data obtained by The Post lacks cryptographic features that would help experts make a reliable determination of authenticity, especially in a case where the original computer and its hard drive are not available for forensic examination. Other factors, such as emails that were only partially downloaded, also stymied the security experts’ efforts to verify content.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

[Anonymous]

The laptop is irrelevant. Investigators have the iCloud and backups of his laptops and his phones so they don’t need the tainted laptop that has passed through so many shady hands.

The plea deal is all you are going to get on Hunter. The Burisma and Bobulinski and bank transfer stuff is all bullshit. Hunter had legitimate business partnerships, though the one proposed by Bobulinski didn’t happen. Joe was not involved and did not use his office to help any of the companies or partnerships. All of that has been investigated and there is nothing there.

[Anonymous]

Up to 10 criminal referrals are coming from Congress, irregardless of the plea.

https://nypost.com/2023/07/20/ultimate-white-privilege-guy-hunter-biden-may-be-hit-with-10-criminal-referrals-comer/