Why do donut hole families

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s insane that our $250K family did not get 1 penny FA for a $60K/year school.

We were also not always $250K family, we were closer to $160/year, then $180K for a few years. Plus the $250 includes one of us having 2 jobs.

My H is a cop and I was a GS-13 most our lives so we could not really save that much.


It's absurd to characterize 250k families as privileged in 2023. After taxes, there is not much left.


Yes, it is. Median household income in the United States is under $71K.[b] It’s no one else’s fault that you *chose* to live in one of the most expensive housing markets in the country.

DCUM’s ideas about income are delusional.


Most people live where they can get jobs and/or close to their family.


NYC is not the only place to get jobs. And not everyone gets to continue to live close to family in an insanely expensive area just because they super duper want to.


DP here. I would love to not live in the DC area, but unfortunately I married someone whose job is dependent on being near DC. If we move to a LCOL area, we have fewer employment options and probably lower salaries. Nothing is going to be perfect.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s insane that our $250K family did not get 1 penny FA for a $60K/year school.

We were also not always $250K family, we were closer to $160/year, then $180K for a few years. Plus the $250 includes one of us having 2 jobs.

My H is a cop and I was a GS-13 most our lives so we could not really save that much.


It's absurd to characterize 250k families as privileged in 2023. After taxes, there is not much left.


Yes, it is. Median household income in the United States is under $71K.[b] It’s no one else’s fault that you *chose* to live in one of the most expensive housing markets in the country.

DCUM’s ideas about income are delusional.


Most people live where they can get jobs and/or close to their family.


NYC is not the only place to get jobs. And not everyone gets to continue to live close to family in an insanely expensive area just because they super duper want to.


NP. Sure but there are *more* jobs in higher cost of living places like NYC. I say this as someone trying to find a job somewhere lower cost of living so I can leave the DC area (where my current job is fixed). I'm filtering out big cities I can't afford like NYC, San Francisco, Toronto, Vancouver and suddenly the jobs available for my skillset go from thousands to tens. Most of the jobs are in places I can't afford to live.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Poor people do not have more options. Most truly poor people are not in the college pipeline.


Additionally, if those "donut hole" families lived like the poor people, rented where they rent, shopped where they shop, etc., they'd have tons of options too. Just saying.


+1

I get that some have special circumstances--medical debt or something unforeseen. But most donut hole families that I know made choices to spend elsewhere. New iPhone every year, 2 Starbucks trips per day, eating lunch out daily, eating half of dinners out, taking really nice vacations, new cars every 3-4 years, etc. Yes those are all "small things" in the grand scheme of savings, but that is just what is visible to me---I'm sure there is much more I don't even see. Someone with a mindset like that is choosing to spend on things when they could choose to save.
We knew our kids would get no aid, so we started saving as soon as they were born. We didn't start living a luxury lifestyle until we could afford it. We paid only 50% of what we could easily afford for our first house and lived there for 7 years. Sure we could afford a newer/nicer home, but we did not need it, this house had 4 bedrooms and 2.5 baths so enough space for a young family---it was relatively speaking much nicer than the apartment we came from. So we lived nicely but not luxuriously and saved the extras. We drove cars for 8-10 years and saved to pay cash for the next ones.
We also choose to not have kids until 30, so that allowed us to consciously save the extra salary and live off of basically one. We aggressively paid off all student loans, invested in our retirement. Other than our honeymoon, I was 35 before I took a "fancy vacation", yet we could have easily afforded to do so at 25/26. But that restraint allowed us to front load saving for college and then we could change our lifestyle as desired.



Same here. Our children can go almost anywhere, but only because we got started saving early and let the savings compound. We never made more than $120K either, but we've always banked at least one income. The irony is that we can now afford to live on one modest income and maintain our lifestyle. Plus, since most of our money is tucked away in retirement accounts and our house is paid off, our EFC is pretty low.

I always think about our situation when people on this board talk about not getting married until you are much older. It's a choice, but you don't get to set your family up nearly as well as if you partnered up earlier in life. However, there is nothing wrong with state schools and lower ranked colleges either.


Exactly. It's all about choices. And of course, nothing wrong with any college. Pick what works for your family, pick what's affordable. But if you choose to have kids before you have paid off your own college debt, it will be harder to save for college and that choice will impact your kid's college choices, just a simple fact of life. Life is about choices, and you get to live with the consequences of your choices as a responsible adult


Right, and if you don't have many or any choices, you are irresponsible. The fact that college costs have far outpaced inflation for decades - increasing by almost 144% in two decades - isn't relevant.

Right?


Obviously that is an issue. And we should work to address that, but given that majority of colleges are private not much can/will be done. However, there ARE affordable options to get an education and that’s the goal. So if you can’t afford on choice search for what you can afford. Not everything in life is fair, but majority of people can afford to get a college degree—just not at a top U for some


The only real affordable options out there for the AVERAGE American (not the "feel poor" DCUMers making $300k per year) is community college or commuting to a state university. Look up average HHIs around the country and tell me how these people are supposed to sock away hundreds of dollars per month for their kid to live on campus at even a state university? And then do that for multiple kids. It's just not reality for most. I'm not saying these are bad options but lets not pretend they're not limited.

I will never cease to be shocked by the clueless posters on here who think people could fully fund college if only they never got Starbucks, got rid of cable, or stop driving BMWs.


Stoping starbucks is not going to fully fund college for you. But The mentality of being frugal will go a long way. And buy a $25K car instead of a $60K car, and yes, you an get along way towards funding college. That's $35K to save. Start that when kid is little and do it with the next car in 8 years, instead of 5 years in between new cars and that's another $35-40K. If both parents do this, that's well over $100K to put towards college. From changing what car you drive---not to mention the insurance will be lower on a $25K vehicle, as well as maintenance. While it will not fully fund college, not driving an BMW will go a LONG WAY towards helping fund college. All for just swapping to a safe reliable decent vehicle instead of luxury. $25-30K will get you a very nice CRV/Accord type vehicle and those will last for 10+ years without many issues. But sure, go ahead buy your $50-60K BMW and complain you can't afford stuff.

And yes, I know people who spend $100/week at Starbucks, add up the family (2 adults and 2-3 kids) and it might be $150/week. That's $600/month. So add that to your $100K+ from car changes and you are saving $6 K more per year (I'll give you the extra $1k as treats/cost of making coffee/drinks at home).

So while you think it's ridiculous, I think the fact people spend $7K+ a year at Starbucks and complain they can't afford college to be ridiculous. Because they have plenty of things to be more frugal with and still live well and have the ability to save.

When I grew up poor/LMC, we ate out 1-2x/month and all other meals were at home. I packed my lunch for school for 12 years, I didn't get to stop at Starbucks (or the 1980's equivalents) with my friends as I did NOT have the money. We did not have cable, my parents got their first color TV in 1995. I had a "car to drive". It came with the privilege of knowing if it was cold morning, the heat/defrost might not work so I would have to pull over 2-3 times on the 6 mile drive to school to scrap my windshield so I could safely see/drive. Also knew how to have friends help me "push the same car" so I could pop the clutch and get it started many times since calling someone to do jump start cost $$.

Yet somehow, my parents still managed to find $5K (about 13% of their pretax income) to contribute towards my college each year and also pay for my books and airfare 2x/school year (to school in Aug, home/back for xmas and back again in May)So overall they managed to come up with ~$7-8K when they made less than $50K. They worked 2nd jobs and lived as frugally as possible and I contributed another $4-5K plus work study and loans each year.


I actually think this is decent advice in general, but some of us are only buying the $25k car (or less!) because that’s what we can afford to begin with, so there bo magical $35k savings from the purchase?

If lots folks are really spending $7k per year on Starbucks, ok fine. I don’t know anyone like that. I probably get coffee out 1-2x per month, and mostly from a local shop, so that’s maybe $100 annually to cut.

Our decisions are a bit more like, do we really need swim lessons during the school year? Does the roof really need to be replaced now?


This. Same position. We maybe get a couple of holiday starbucks in December. One of our cars is over 10 years old and has 200K miles on it. We are in our home that we bought over 20 years ago and never "upgraded." Our expenses are more mundane as the other poster notes. And, no, we are not able to save $50-$80K/year for college. Just because some anonymous person on here thinks I should live in a way that forces to put every cent to college savings doesn't mean I can or should have to.


A lot of the replies here seem to be UMC/wealthy folks disparaging people who have different life circumstances and make less money. All it's all about "choices" for them. We are like you--and I bet most "donut hole" families are in the same boat. We drive old cars, have a modest home, definitely no fancy vacations. And no we are not looking to have our kids go to fancy private colleges. In-state for us. It's like the boomers who tell people to stop drinking lattes to afford XYZ. Instead of looking at stagnant wages, skyrocketing college costs, inflation....no let's make assumptions about everyone's spending habits. And the oh just move to LCOL area is so tone deaf. If only rich people live in HCOL areas-who is going to mown your lawn? educate your kids? be your admin assistant? take care of your family in the hospital?


This. I’m sure the “all about choices” folks would claim that you made a choice to live in a country with stagnant wages and skyrocketing college costs and inflation. I’m not sure at what point I should have done this analysis AND been able to predict which country would weather this better and have all the steps in place to get a job and work visa to said country. Apparently buying lattes, being an extraordinary economist to accurately forecast all that information plus perhaps another career to get a work visa, and being willing to uproot to another country is all it takes to control your fate and not be a donut hole family. Who knew.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yeah. I don’t get any money on the college calculator. We are career feds. No Starbucks. No hair and nails (other than a $59 cut 3x a year). Cars are over 10 years old. No fancy vacas. I think it’s crazy that anyone expects us to be able to pay $80,000/year for college. I’m not begrudging the aid for those who make less. And I do have the option of working til I’m 75 to pay it off (that someone with less money doesn’t have). But boy, the list price is nuts. My parents were able to pay for the priciest private college on modest MC salaries without aid and not be in debt forever. I can’t.


They expected you to save some over the years, not cash flow 80K. However, if you have not done that, there are literally hundreds of more affordable choices, so you have your kid apply and attend one of those
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Poor people do not have more options. Most truly poor people are not in the college pipeline.


Additionally, if those "donut hole" families lived like the poor people, rented where they rent, shopped where they shop, etc., they'd have tons of options too. Just saying.


+1

I get that some have special circumstances--medical debt or something unforeseen. But most donut hole families that I know made choices to spend elsewhere. New iPhone every year, 2 Starbucks trips per day, eating lunch out daily, eating half of dinners out, taking really nice vacations, new cars every 3-4 years, etc. Yes those are all "small things" in the grand scheme of savings, but that is just what is visible to me---I'm sure there is much more I don't even see. Someone with a mindset like that is choosing to spend on things when they could choose to save.
We knew our kids would get no aid, so we started saving as soon as they were born. We didn't start living a luxury lifestyle until we could afford it. We paid only 50% of what we could easily afford for our first house and lived there for 7 years. Sure we could afford a newer/nicer home, but we did not need it, this house had 4 bedrooms and 2.5 baths so enough space for a young family---it was relatively speaking much nicer than the apartment we came from. So we lived nicely but not luxuriously and saved the extras. We drove cars for 8-10 years and saved to pay cash for the next ones.
We also choose to not have kids until 30, so that allowed us to consciously save the extra salary and live off of basically one. We aggressively paid off all student loans, invested in our retirement. Other than our honeymoon, I was 35 before I took a "fancy vacation", yet we could have easily afforded to do so at 25/26. But that restraint allowed us to front load saving for college and then we could change our lifestyle as desired.



Same here. Our children can go almost anywhere, but only because we got started saving early and let the savings compound. We never made more than $120K either, but we've always banked at least one income. The irony is that we can now afford to live on one modest income and maintain our lifestyle. Plus, since most of our money is tucked away in retirement accounts and our house is paid off, our EFC is pretty low.

I always think about our situation when people on this board talk about not getting married until you are much older. It's a choice, but you don't get to set your family up nearly as well as if you partnered up earlier in life. However, there is nothing wrong with state schools and lower ranked colleges either.


Exactly. It's all about choices. And of course, nothing wrong with any college. Pick what works for your family, pick what's affordable. But if you choose to have kids before you have paid off your own college debt, it will be harder to save for college and that choice will impact your kid's college choices, just a simple fact of life. Life is about choices, and you get to live with the consequences of your choices as a responsible adult


Right, and if you don't have many or any choices, you are irresponsible. The fact that college costs have far outpaced inflation for decades - increasing by almost 144% in two decades - isn't relevant.

Right?


Obviously that is an issue. And we should work to address that, but given that majority of colleges are private not much can/will be done. However, there ARE affordable options to get an education and that’s the goal. So if you can’t afford on choice search for what you can afford. Not everything in life is fair, but majority of people can afford to get a college degree—just not at a top U for some


The only real affordable options out there for the AVERAGE American (not the "feel poor" DCUMers making $300k per year) is community college or commuting to a state university. Look up average HHIs around the country and tell me how these people are supposed to sock away hundreds of dollars per month for their kid to live on campus at even a state university? And then do that for multiple kids. It's just not reality for most. I'm not saying these are bad options but lets not pretend they're not limited.

I will never cease to be shocked by the clueless posters on here who think people could fully fund college if only they never got Starbucks, got rid of cable, or stop driving BMWs.


Stoping starbucks is not going to fully fund college for you. But The mentality of being frugal will go a long way. And buy a $25K car instead of a $60K car, and yes, you an get along way towards funding college. That's $35K to save. Start that when kid is little and do it with the next car in 8 years, instead of 5 years in between new cars and that's another $35-40K. If both parents do this, that's well over $100K to put towards college. From changing what car you drive---not to mention the insurance will be lower on a $25K vehicle, as well as maintenance. While it will not fully fund college, not driving an BMW will go a LONG WAY towards helping fund college. All for just swapping to a safe reliable decent vehicle instead of luxury. $25-30K will get you a very nice CRV/Accord type vehicle and those will last for 10+ years without many issues. But sure, go ahead buy your $50-60K BMW and complain you can't afford stuff.

And yes, I know people who spend $100/week at Starbucks, add up the family (2 adults and 2-3 kids) and it might be $150/week. That's $600/month. So add that to your $100K+ from car changes and you are saving $6 K more per year (I'll give you the extra $1k as treats/cost of making coffee/drinks at home).

So while you think it's ridiculous, I think the fact people spend $7K+ a year at Starbucks and complain they can't afford college to be ridiculous. Because they have plenty of things to be more frugal with and still live well and have the ability to save.

When I grew up poor/LMC, we ate out 1-2x/month and all other meals were at home. I packed my lunch for school for 12 years, I didn't get to stop at Starbucks (or the 1980's equivalents) with my friends as I did NOT have the money. We did not have cable, my parents got their first color TV in 1995. I had a "car to drive". It came with the privilege of knowing if it was cold morning, the heat/defrost might not work so I would have to pull over 2-3 times on the 6 mile drive to school to scrap my windshield so I could safely see/drive. Also knew how to have friends help me "push the same car" so I could pop the clutch and get it started many times since calling someone to do jump start cost $$.

Yet somehow, my parents still managed to find $5K (about 13% of their pretax income) to contribute towards my college each year and also pay for my books and airfare 2x/school year (to school in Aug, home/back for xmas and back again in May)So overall they managed to come up with ~$7-8K when they made less than $50K. They worked 2nd jobs and lived as frugally as possible and I contributed another $4-5K plus work study and loans each year.


Honestly THIS. Spending all the money on ‘I gotta have it’ items like sbux, hair and nails, a newer car, upgrading the house, a splurge vacation, all of that easily adds up to 15K per year. If it were invested for even 10 years, with compound interest that’s enough for private school. Rinse repeat for kid number 2.


Right! When most of us mention "spending at Starbucks" we are talking about people that actually have extra income to save. I'm not referring to the person already driving a 10yo Honda Accord who may not be able to save. I have empathy for them. But if they are also spending $100/month on Starbucks (a want not a Need), then yes, they could be saving that for college as well. It's a choice they are making and choices have consequences.

Yes college costs too much. But there are ways to do it affordably for most, it just may not be the Elite T20 schools.


NP. Yeah, I spend like $5 every other month at Starbucks. I can't afford that lifestyle! We also have saved rigorously for our 2 kids, and at under 150k HHI, will qualify for FA at some schools. Multi-prong strategy!


It is called living within your means. Identify "wants" vs "needs" and include savings in your "needs" before you start splurging on the "wants".
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s insane that our $250K family did not get 1 penny FA for a $60K/year school.

We were also not always $250K family, we were closer to $160/year, then $180K for a few years. Plus the $250 includes one of us having 2 jobs.

My H is a cop and I was a GS-13 most our lives so we could not really save that much.


It's absurd to characterize 250k families as privileged in 2023. After taxes, there is not much left.


Yes, it is. Median household income in the United States is under $71K.[b] It’s no one else’s fault that you *chose* to live in one of the most expensive housing markets in the country.

DCUM’s ideas about income are delusional.


Most people live where they can get jobs and/or close to their family.


And people should choose to live within their means. You know your income and cost of living and you budget and adjust. If you choose to live in an expensive area just to be near family, great. But then it's a choice and you need to adjust accordingly. If your job does not pay enough to live in a HCOL area then actively search and make a plan to move elsewhere. Fact is life is about choices. Majority of Americans live on much less than the DCUM. Some even in HCOL areas. If you choose to live in HCOL area you have to adjust your lifestyle to accommodate and that means getting less "wants" satisfied if you want to be a responsible adult.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Maybe I missed someone else posting this, but it is about to get WORSE for donut hole families who have two kids close in age! Quietly how financial aid is calculated for people who have two kids in college has changed. Instead of factoring in having to pay tuition for multiple kids now financial aid is no calculating this.

By this it used to be that let's say you earn 150000 and the EFC says you can contribute 60,000. It used to be that if you had two kids then you paid 30K per kid. Or if you had three kids in college you were expected to contribute 20K per year. Now you are expected to contribute 60K no matter how many other college tuitions you are paying. So if you have two kids you would pay 120,000 which is ridiculous for a family making 150,000.


You should consider that when you decide the number of kids you have. Life is about choices. Saving is a choice, the house and expenses you have are choices, and the number of kids you have are choices.


+1

Choose to have more kids than you can afford, and you might not send them to an $80K/year school. If that's your goal you must plan accordingly and save accordingly. But it's not like you can't send them to college you just need to plan
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Poor people do not have more options. Most truly poor people are not in the college pipeline.


Additionally, if those "donut hole" families lived like the poor people, rented where they rent, shopped where they shop, etc., they'd have tons of options too. Just saying.


+1

I get that some have special circumstances--medical debt or something unforeseen. But most donut hole families that I know made choices to spend elsewhere. New iPhone every year, 2 Starbucks trips per day, eating lunch out daily, eating half of dinners out, taking really nice vacations, new cars every 3-4 years, etc. Yes those are all "small things" in the grand scheme of savings, but that is just what is visible to me---I'm sure there is much more I don't even see. Someone with a mindset like that is choosing to spend on things when they could choose to save.
We knew our kids would get no aid, so we started saving as soon as they were born. We didn't start living a luxury lifestyle until we could afford it. We paid only 50% of what we could easily afford for our first house and lived there for 7 years. Sure we could afford a newer/nicer home, but we did not need it, this house had 4 bedrooms and 2.5 baths so enough space for a young family---it was relatively speaking much nicer than the apartment we came from. So we lived nicely but not luxuriously and saved the extras. We drove cars for 8-10 years and saved to pay cash for the next ones.
We also choose to not have kids until 30, so that allowed us to consciously save the extra salary and live off of basically one. We aggressively paid off all student loans, invested in our retirement. Other than our honeymoon, I was 35 before I took a "fancy vacation", yet we could have easily afforded to do so at 25/26. But that restraint allowed us to front load saving for college and then we could change our lifestyle as desired.



Same here. Our children can go almost anywhere, but only because we got started saving early and let the savings compound. We never made more than $120K either, but we've always banked at least one income. The irony is that we can now afford to live on one modest income and maintain our lifestyle. Plus, since most of our money is tucked away in retirement accounts and our house is paid off, our EFC is pretty low.

I always think about our situation when people on this board talk about not getting married until you are much older. It's a choice, but you don't get to set your family up nearly as well as if you partnered up earlier in life. However, there is nothing wrong with state schools and lower ranked colleges either.


Exactly. It's all about choices. And of course, nothing wrong with any college. Pick what works for your family, pick what's affordable. But if you choose to have kids before you have paid off your own college debt, it will be harder to save for college and that choice will impact your kid's college choices, just a simple fact of life. Life is about choices, and you get to live with the consequences of your choices as a responsible adult


Right, and if you don't have many or any choices, you are irresponsible. The fact that college costs have far outpaced inflation for decades - increasing by almost 144% in two decades - isn't relevant.

Right?


Obviously that is an issue. And we should work to address that, but given that majority of colleges are private not much can/will be done. However, there ARE affordable options to get an education and that’s the goal. So if you can’t afford on choice search for what you can afford. Not everything in life is fair, but majority of people can afford to get a college degree—just not at a top U for some


The only real affordable options out there for the AVERAGE American (not the "feel poor" DCUMers making $300k per year) is community college or commuting to a state university. Look up average HHIs around the country and tell me how these people are supposed to sock away hundreds of dollars per month for their kid to live on campus at even a state university? And then do that for multiple kids. It's just not reality for most. I'm not saying these are bad options but lets not pretend they're not limited.

I will never cease to be shocked by the clueless posters on here who think people could fully fund college if only they never got Starbucks, got rid of cable, or stop driving BMWs.


Stoping starbucks is not going to fully fund college for you. But The mentality of being frugal will go a long way. And buy a $25K car instead of a $60K car, and yes, you an get along way towards funding college. That's $35K to save. Start that when kid is little and do it with the next car in 8 years, instead of 5 years in between new cars and that's another $35-40K. If both parents do this, that's well over $100K to put towards college. From changing what car you drive---not to mention the insurance will be lower on a $25K vehicle, as well as maintenance. While it will not fully fund college, not driving an BMW will go a LONG WAY towards helping fund college. All for just swapping to a safe reliable decent vehicle instead of luxury. $25-30K will get you a very nice CRV/Accord type vehicle and those will last for 10+ years without many issues. But sure, go ahead buy your $50-60K BMW and complain you can't afford stuff.

And yes, I know people who spend $100/week at Starbucks, add up the family (2 adults and 2-3 kids) and it might be $150/week. That's $600/month. So add that to your $100K+ from car changes and you are saving $6 K more per year (I'll give you the extra $1k as treats/cost of making coffee/drinks at home).

So while you think it's ridiculous, I think the fact people spend $7K+ a year at Starbucks and complain they can't afford college to be ridiculous. Because they have plenty of things to be more frugal with and still live well and have the ability to save.

When I grew up poor/LMC, we ate out 1-2x/month and all other meals were at home. I packed my lunch for school for 12 years, I didn't get to stop at Starbucks (or the 1980's equivalents) with my friends as I did NOT have the money. We did not have cable, my parents got their first color TV in 1995. I had a "car to drive". It came with the privilege of knowing if it was cold morning, the heat/defrost might not work so I would have to pull over 2-3 times on the 6 mile drive to school to scrap my windshield so I could safely see/drive. Also knew how to have friends help me "push the same car" so I could pop the clutch and get it started many times since calling someone to do jump start cost $$.

Yet somehow, my parents still managed to find $5K (about 13% of their pretax income) to contribute towards my college each year and also pay for my books and airfare 2x/school year (to school in Aug, home/back for xmas and back again in May)So overall they managed to come up with ~$7-8K when they made less than $50K. They worked 2nd jobs and lived as frugally as possible and I contributed another $4-5K plus work study and loans each year.


I actually think this is decent advice in general, but some of us are only buying the $25k car (or less!) because that’s what we can afford to begin with, so there bo magical $35k savings from the purchase?

If lots folks are really spending $7k per year on Starbucks, ok fine. I don’t know anyone like that. I probably get coffee out 1-2x per month, and mostly from a local shop, so that’s maybe $100 annually to cut.

Our decisions are a bit more like, do we really need swim lessons during the school year? Does the roof really need to be replaced now?


Totally understand that. You don't have much "wants" to cut/adjust. The above is about the many many people I know/see who easily could cut and save for college but dont do so and then complain.
So you budget and attempt to save what you can. And you plan/prep your kids for the fact that Harvard is not affordable for you, so lets search for merit and find an awesome list of schools that we can afford---plenty that give merit if you search privates and have a decent student. Your kid will grow up knowing they need to work to help get thru college and do well in MS/HS to earn the most merit possible. But there are plenty of places your kid can attend. As I mentioned above, my parents managed to find over 10% of their income to help pay for college yet didn't make much. They managed to save a little and cash flow with 2nd jobs for one of them and I worked 60+Hrs in the summer and as much as I could every break I was home (and my at school job when I was at school).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Poor people do not have more options. Most truly poor people are not in the college pipeline.


Additionally, if those "donut hole" families lived like the poor people, rented where they rent, shopped where they shop, etc., they'd have tons of options too. Just saying.


+1

I get that some have special circumstances--medical debt or something unforeseen. But most donut hole families that I know made choices to spend elsewhere. New iPhone every year, 2 Starbucks trips per day, eating lunch out daily, eating half of dinners out, taking really nice vacations, new cars every 3-4 years, etc. Yes those are all "small things" in the grand scheme of savings, but that is just what is visible to me---I'm sure there is much more I don't even see. Someone with a mindset like that is choosing to spend on things when they could choose to save.
We knew our kids would get no aid, so we started saving as soon as they were born. We didn't start living a luxury lifestyle until we could afford it. We paid only 50% of what we could easily afford for our first house and lived there for 7 years. Sure we could afford a newer/nicer home, but we did not need it, this house had 4 bedrooms and 2.5 baths so enough space for a young family---it was relatively speaking much nicer than the apartment we came from. So we lived nicely but not luxuriously and saved the extras. We drove cars for 8-10 years and saved to pay cash for the next ones.
We also choose to not have kids until 30, so that allowed us to consciously save the extra salary and live off of basically one. We aggressively paid off all student loans, invested in our retirement. Other than our honeymoon, I was 35 before I took a "fancy vacation", yet we could have easily afforded to do so at 25/26. But that restraint allowed us to front load saving for college and then we could change our lifestyle as desired.



Same here. Our children can go almost anywhere, but only because we got started saving early and let the savings compound. We never made more than $120K either, but we've always banked at least one income. The irony is that we can now afford to live on one modest income and maintain our lifestyle. Plus, since most of our money is tucked away in retirement accounts and our house is paid off, our EFC is pretty low.

I always think about our situation when people on this board talk about not getting married until you are much older. It's a choice, but you don't get to set your family up nearly as well as if you partnered up earlier in life. However, there is nothing wrong with state schools and lower ranked colleges either.


Exactly. It's all about choices. And of course, nothing wrong with any college. Pick what works for your family, pick what's affordable. But if you choose to have kids before you have paid off your own college debt, it will be harder to save for college and that choice will impact your kid's college choices, just a simple fact of life. Life is about choices, and you get to live with the consequences of your choices as a responsible adult


Right, and if you don't have many or any choices, you are irresponsible. The fact that college costs have far outpaced inflation for decades - increasing by almost 144% in two decades - isn't relevant.

Right?


Obviously that is an issue. And we should work to address that, but given that majority of colleges are private not much can/will be done. However, there ARE affordable options to get an education and that’s the goal. So if you can’t afford on choice search for what you can afford. Not everything in life is fair, but majority of people can afford to get a college degree—just not at a top U for some


The only real affordable options out there for the AVERAGE American (not the "feel poor" DCUMers making $300k per year) is community college or commuting to a state university. Look up average HHIs around the country and tell me how these people are supposed to sock away hundreds of dollars per month for their kid to live on campus at even a state university? And then do that for multiple kids. It's just not reality for most. I'm not saying these are bad options but lets not pretend they're not limited.

I will never cease to be shocked by the clueless posters on here who think people could fully fund college if only they never got Starbucks, got rid of cable, or stop driving BMWs.


Stoping starbucks is not going to fully fund college for you. But The mentality of being frugal will go a long way. And buy a $25K car instead of a $60K car, and yes, you an get along way towards funding college. That's $35K to save. Start that when kid is little and do it with the next car in 8 years, instead of 5 years in between new cars and that's another $35-40K. If both parents do this, that's well over $100K to put towards college. From changing what car you drive---not to mention the insurance will be lower on a $25K vehicle, as well as maintenance. While it will not fully fund college, not driving an BMW will go a LONG WAY towards helping fund college. All for just swapping to a safe reliable decent vehicle instead of luxury. $25-30K will get you a very nice CRV/Accord type vehicle and those will last for 10+ years without many issues. But sure, go ahead buy your $50-60K BMW and complain you can't afford stuff.

And yes, I know people who spend $100/week at Starbucks, add up the family (2 adults and 2-3 kids) and it might be $150/week. That's $600/month. So add that to your $100K+ from car changes and you are saving $6 K more per year (I'll give you the extra $1k as treats/cost of making coffee/drinks at home).

So while you think it's ridiculous, I think the fact people spend $7K+ a year at Starbucks and complain they can't afford college to be ridiculous. Because they have plenty of things to be more frugal with and still live well and have the ability to save.

When I grew up poor/LMC, we ate out 1-2x/month and all other meals were at home. I packed my lunch for school for 12 years, I didn't get to stop at Starbucks (or the 1980's equivalents) with my friends as I did NOT have the money. We did not have cable, my parents got their first color TV in 1995. I had a "car to drive". It came with the privilege of knowing if it was cold morning, the heat/defrost might not work so I would have to pull over 2-3 times on the 6 mile drive to school to scrap my windshield so I could safely see/drive. Also knew how to have friends help me "push the same car" so I could pop the clutch and get it started many times since calling someone to do jump start cost $$.

Yet somehow, my parents still managed to find $5K (about 13% of their pretax income) to contribute towards my college each year and also pay for my books and airfare 2x/school year (to school in Aug, home/back for xmas and back again in May)So overall they managed to come up with ~$7-8K when they made less than $50K. They worked 2nd jobs and lived as frugally as possible and I contributed another $4-5K plus work study and loans each year.


I actually think this is decent advice in general, but some of us are only buying the $25k car (or less!) because that’s what we can afford to begin with, so there bo magical $35k savings from the purchase?

If lots folks are really spending $7k per year on Starbucks, ok fine. I don’t know anyone like that. I probably get coffee out 1-2x per month, and mostly from a local shop, so that’s maybe $100 annually to cut.

Our decisions are a bit more like, do we really need swim lessons during the school year? Does the roof really need to be replaced now?


This. Same position. We maybe get a couple of holiday starbucks in December. One of our cars is over 10 years old and has 200K miles on it. We are in our home that we bought over 20 years ago and never "upgraded." Our expenses are more mundane as the other poster notes. And, no, we are not able to save $50-$80K/year for college. Just because some anonymous person on here thinks I should live in a way that forces to put every cent to college savings doesn't mean I can or should have to.


No one is forcing you to. But it's up to you to figure out how to put your kid thru college. There are plenty of affordable ways. And if you want the 80K/year school, then you had to prepare. Otherwise you should send your kid to where you as a family can afford. There are plenty of choices that are only $30K/year.

Btw, you don't need to save $50-80K/year. If you save since they are little, even $10K/year goes a really long way towards funding college. But if you don't plan and wait until they are teens, their affordable options are less. But there are still many ways to get an education.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Poor people do not have more options. Most truly poor people are not in the college pipeline.


Additionally, if those "donut hole" families lived like the poor people, rented where they rent, shopped where they shop, etc., they'd have tons of options too. Just saying.


+1

I get that some have special circumstances--medical debt or something unforeseen. But most donut hole families that I know made choices to spend elsewhere. New iPhone every year, 2 Starbucks trips per day, eating lunch out daily, eating half of dinners out, taking really nice vacations, new cars every 3-4 years, etc. Yes those are all "small things" in the grand scheme of savings, but that is just what is visible to me---I'm sure there is much more I don't even see. Someone with a mindset like that is choosing to spend on things when they could choose to save.
We knew our kids would get no aid, so we started saving as soon as they were born. We didn't start living a luxury lifestyle until we could afford it. We paid only 50% of what we could easily afford for our first house and lived there for 7 years. Sure we could afford a newer/nicer home, but we did not need it, this house had 4 bedrooms and 2.5 baths so enough space for a young family---it was relatively speaking much nicer than the apartment we came from. So we lived nicely but not luxuriously and saved the extras. We drove cars for 8-10 years and saved to pay cash for the next ones.
We also choose to not have kids until 30, so that allowed us to consciously save the extra salary and live off of basically one. We aggressively paid off all student loans, invested in our retirement. Other than our honeymoon, I was 35 before I took a "fancy vacation", yet we could have easily afforded to do so at 25/26. But that restraint allowed us to front load saving for college and then we could change our lifestyle as desired.



Same here. Our children can go almost anywhere, but only because we got started saving early and let the savings compound. We never made more than $120K either, but we've always banked at least one income. The irony is that we can now afford to live on one modest income and maintain our lifestyle. Plus, since most of our money is tucked away in retirement accounts and our house is paid off, our EFC is pretty low.

I always think about our situation when people on this board talk about not getting married until you are much older. It's a choice, but you don't get to set your family up nearly as well as if you partnered up earlier in life. However, there is nothing wrong with state schools and lower ranked colleges either.


Exactly. It's all about choices. And of course, nothing wrong with any college. Pick what works for your family, pick what's affordable. But if you choose to have kids before you have paid off your own college debt, it will be harder to save for college and that choice will impact your kid's college choices, just a simple fact of life. Life is about choices, and you get to live with the consequences of your choices as a responsible adult


Right, and if you don't have many or any choices, you are irresponsible. The fact that college costs have far outpaced inflation for decades - increasing by almost 144% in two decades - isn't relevant.

Right?


Obviously that is an issue. And we should work to address that, but given that majority of colleges are private not much can/will be done. However, there ARE affordable options to get an education and that’s the goal. So if you can’t afford on choice search for what you can afford. Not everything in life is fair, but majority of people can afford to get a college degree—just not at a top U for some


The only real affordable options out there for the AVERAGE American (not the "feel poor" DCUMers making $300k per year) is community college or commuting to a state university. Look up average HHIs around the country and tell me how these people are supposed to sock away hundreds of dollars per month for their kid to live on campus at even a state university? And then do that for multiple kids. It's just not reality for most. I'm not saying these are bad options but lets not pretend they're not limited.

I will never cease to be shocked by the clueless posters on here who think people could fully fund college if only they never got Starbucks, got rid of cable, or stop driving BMWs.


Stoping starbucks is not going to fully fund college for you. But The mentality of being frugal will go a long way. And buy a $25K car instead of a $60K car, and yes, you an get along way towards funding college. That's $35K to save. Start that when kid is little and do it with the next car in 8 years, instead of 5 years in between new cars and that's another $35-40K. If both parents do this, that's well over $100K to put towards college. From changing what car you drive---not to mention the insurance will be lower on a $25K vehicle, as well as maintenance. While it will not fully fund college, not driving an BMW will go a LONG WAY towards helping fund college. All for just swapping to a safe reliable decent vehicle instead of luxury. $25-30K will get you a very nice CRV/Accord type vehicle and those will last for 10+ years without many issues. But sure, go ahead buy your $50-60K BMW and complain you can't afford stuff.

And yes, I know people who spend $100/week at Starbucks, add up the family (2 adults and 2-3 kids) and it might be $150/week. That's $600/month. So add that to your $100K+ from car changes and you are saving $6 K more per year (I'll give you the extra $1k as treats/cost of making coffee/drinks at home).

So while you think it's ridiculous, I think the fact people spend $7K+ a year at Starbucks and complain they can't afford college to be ridiculous. Because they have plenty of things to be more frugal with and still live well and have the ability to save.

When I grew up poor/LMC, we ate out 1-2x/month and all other meals were at home. I packed my lunch for school for 12 years, I didn't get to stop at Starbucks (or the 1980's equivalents) with my friends as I did NOT have the money. We did not have cable, my parents got their first color TV in 1995. I had a "car to drive". It came with the privilege of knowing if it was cold morning, the heat/defrost might not work so I would have to pull over 2-3 times on the 6 mile drive to school to scrap my windshield so I could safely see/drive. Also knew how to have friends help me "push the same car" so I could pop the clutch and get it started many times since calling someone to do jump start cost $$.

Yet somehow, my parents still managed to find $5K (about 13% of their pretax income) to contribute towards my college each year and also pay for my books and airfare 2x/school year (to school in Aug, home/back for xmas and back again in May)So overall they managed to come up with ~$7-8K when they made less than $50K. They worked 2nd jobs and lived as frugally as possible and I contributed another $4-5K plus work study and loans each year.


I actually think this is decent advice in general, but some of us are only buying the $25k car (or less!) because that’s what we can afford to begin with, so there bo magical $35k savings from the purchase?

If lots folks are really spending $7k per year on Starbucks, ok fine. I don’t know anyone like that. I probably get coffee out 1-2x per month, and mostly from a local shop, so that’s maybe $100 annually to cut.

Our decisions are a bit more like, do we really need swim lessons during the school year? Does the roof really need to be replaced now?


This. Same position. We maybe get a couple of holiday starbucks in December. One of our cars is over 10 years old and has 200K miles on it. We are in our home that we bought over 20 years ago and never "upgraded." Our expenses are more mundane as the other poster notes. And, no, we are not able to save $50-$80K/year for college. Just because some anonymous person on here thinks I should live in a way that forces to put every cent to college savings doesn't mean I can or should have to.


No one is forcing you to. But it's up to you to figure out how to put your kid thru college. There are plenty of affordable ways. And if you want the 80K/year school, then you had to prepare. Otherwise you should send your kid to where you as a family can afford. There are plenty of choices that are only $30K/year.

Btw, you don't need to save $50-80K/year. If you save since they are little, even $10K/year goes a really long way towards funding college. But if you don't plan and wait until they are teens, their affordable options are less. But there are still many ways to get an education.




Only 10k a year?

We made 100k HH for many years, which paid for a mortgage for a 1400 square foot house in Sterling, and two cars. Kids are in rec sports, no tutoring. We eat out once or twice a month. Our families are overseas, so we did spend around 2k a year on plane tickets.
There were no 10k to save. We now make around 160k, but the house needs repairs and the cars will need to be replaced.
Kids will attend community college and then hopefully transfer overseas.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s insane that our $250K family did not get 1 penny FA for a $60K/year school.

We were also not always $250K family, we were closer to $160/year, then $180K for a few years. Plus the $250 includes one of us having 2 jobs.

My H is a cop and I was a GS-13 most our lives so we could not really save that much.


It's absurd to characterize 250k families as privileged in 2023. After taxes, there is not much left.


Yes, it is. Median household income in the United States is under $71K.[b] It’s no one else’s fault that you *chose* to live in one of the most expensive housing markets in the country.

DCUM’s ideas about income are delusional.


Most people live where they can get jobs and/or close to their family.


And people should choose to live within their means. You know your income and cost of living and you budget and adjust. If you choose to live in an expensive area just to be near family, great. But then it's a choice and you need to adjust accordingly. If your job does not pay enough to live in a HCOL area then actively search and make a plan to move elsewhere. Fact is life is about choices. Majority of Americans live on much less than the DCUM. Some even in HCOL areas. If you choose to live in HCOL area you have to adjust your lifestyle to accommodate and that means getting less "wants" satisfied if you want to be a responsible adult.

Again with the just move to a lower cost area. That is not possible for many people. And that reasoning makes no freaking sense bc then just well off people would live in HCOL areas. And who is going to do all the other jobs (which are the vast majority of jobs)? Are you saying nurses, teachers, cops, etc should only live in LCOL areas? How far would they have to commute just to come work at a HCOL area to support the rich folks? Teach their kids? DCUM is filed with supposedly smart people but damn, some of you can’t really see outside your bubble and are some of the most concrete thinkers I’ve ever come across.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Complain about being a donut hole family? When there are thousands of colleges that could work between in state options and merit aid at lower tier privates and other oos public’s?l is it bc ivies and top 25 are not options?


https://www.marketplace.org/2021/01/27/finding-affordable-college-merit-scholarship-need-based-aid-fafsa-full-tuition-ron-lieber/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s insane that our $250K family did not get 1 penny FA for a $60K/year school.

We were also not always $250K family, we were closer to $160/year, then $180K for a few years. Plus the $250 includes one of us having 2 jobs.

My H is a cop and I was a GS-13 most our lives so we could not really save that much.


It's absurd to characterize 250k families as privileged in 2023. After taxes, there is not much left.


Yes, it is. Median household income in the United States is under $71K.[b] It’s no one else’s fault that you *chose* to live in one of the most expensive housing markets in the country.

DCUM’s ideas about income are delusional.


Most people live where they can get jobs and/or close to their family.


And people should choose to live within their means. You know your income and cost of living and you budget and adjust. If you choose to live in an expensive area just to be near family, great. But then it's a choice and you need to adjust accordingly. If your job does not pay enough to live in a HCOL area then actively search and make a plan to move elsewhere. Fact is life is about choices. Majority of Americans live on much less than the DCUM. Some even in HCOL areas. If you choose to live in HCOL area you have to adjust your lifestyle to accommodate and that means getting less "wants" satisfied if you want to be a responsible adult.


I love how not being to afford 80K for college per year (heading towards 100K per child per year) is a personal choice and when I was making decisions to have children I should have known colleges would have tripled in cost and far outpaced inflation. If I had all these powers to predict the future honestly I would have used it on a lotto pick and won the mega millions.

I’m not even sure what these lectures about being a responsible adult is about. The bottom line is with the information I had at the time making the life decisions I made, there was never this one moment of time that I had all the pieces in front of me and had certainly and could weigh all the implications in totality to make a decision that would have been this “choice” to afford an 80k/year college. If my kids decide to have children they are working from the information that private colleges cost more than most homes and possibly public college tuition might be out of reach, that jobs aren’t secure and can be outsourced. After having their college choices limited to public colleges and private colleges with merit they might structure their lives around that by having 1 or no children or selecting a field that makes it easy to find a job in a lower cost of living area so that their kid can pick any college they get into. However, even if they structure their lives with that goal there is still a level of unpredictability with best laid plans - what if there is another pandemic, what if technology advances to make their field obsolete etc. So it’s also possible to be responsible and make good financial choices and still not being to afford something. I’m not saying they entitled to this or need this, I’m just saying this isn’t a Choose Your Own Adventure book where an obvious choice leads you to everything- its more like the Game of Life where it’s luck, timing, and small decisions and it doesn’t always turn out as planned despite “choices”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Poor people do not have more options. Most truly poor people are not in the college pipeline.


Additionally, if those "donut hole" families lived like the poor people, rented where they rent, shopped where they shop, etc., they'd have tons of options too. Just saying.


+1

I get that some have special circumstances--medical debt or something unforeseen. But most donut hole families that I know made choices to spend elsewhere. New iPhone every year, 2 Starbucks trips per day, eating lunch out daily, eating half of dinners out, taking really nice vacations, new cars every 3-4 years, etc. Yes those are all "small things" in the grand scheme of savings, but that is just what is visible to me---I'm sure there is much more I don't even see. Someone with a mindset like that is choosing to spend on things when they could choose to save.
We knew our kids would get no aid, so we started saving as soon as they were born. We didn't start living a luxury lifestyle until we could afford it. We paid only 50% of what we could easily afford for our first house and lived there for 7 years. Sure we could afford a newer/nicer home, but we did not need it, this house had 4 bedrooms and 2.5 baths so enough space for a young family---it was relatively speaking much nicer than the apartment we came from. So we lived nicely but not luxuriously and saved the extras. We drove cars for 8-10 years and saved to pay cash for the next ones.
We also choose to not have kids until 30, so that allowed us to consciously save the extra salary and live off of basically one. We aggressively paid off all student loans, invested in our retirement. Other than our honeymoon, I was 35 before I took a "fancy vacation", yet we could have easily afforded to do so at 25/26. But that restraint allowed us to front load saving for college and then we could change our lifestyle as desired.



Same here. Our children can go almost anywhere, but only because we got started saving early and let the savings compound. We never made more than $120K either, but we've always banked at least one income. The irony is that we can now afford to live on one modest income and maintain our lifestyle. Plus, since most of our money is tucked away in retirement accounts and our house is paid off, our EFC is pretty low.

I always think about our situation when people on this board talk about not getting married until you are much older. It's a choice, but you don't get to set your family up nearly as well as if you partnered up earlier in life. However, there is nothing wrong with state schools and lower ranked colleges either.


Exactly. It's all about choices. And of course, nothing wrong with any college. Pick what works for your family, pick what's affordable. But if you choose to have kids before you have paid off your own college debt, it will be harder to save for college and that choice will impact your kid's college choices, just a simple fact of life. Life is about choices, and you get to live with the consequences of your choices as a responsible adult


Right, and if you don't have many or any choices, you are irresponsible. The fact that college costs have far outpaced inflation for decades - increasing by almost 144% in two decades - isn't relevant.

Right?


Obviously that is an issue. And we should work to address that, but given that majority of colleges are private not much can/will be done. However, there ARE affordable options to get an education and that’s the goal. So if you can’t afford on choice search for what you can afford. Not everything in life is fair, but majority of people can afford to get a college degree—just not at a top U for some


The only real affordable options out there for the AVERAGE American (not the "feel poor" DCUMers making $300k per year) is community college or commuting to a state university. Look up average HHIs around the country and tell me how these people are supposed to sock away hundreds of dollars per month for their kid to live on campus at even a state university? And then do that for multiple kids. It's just not reality for most. I'm not saying these are bad options but lets not pretend they're not limited.

I will never cease to be shocked by the clueless posters on here who think people could fully fund college if only they never got Starbucks, got rid of cable, or stop driving BMWs.


Stoping starbucks is not going to fully fund college for you. But The mentality of being frugal will go a long way. And buy a $25K car instead of a $60K car, and yes, you an get along way towards funding college. That's $35K to save. Start that when kid is little and do it with the next car in 8 years, instead of 5 years in between new cars and that's another $35-40K. If both parents do this, that's well over $100K to put towards college. From changing what car you drive---not to mention the insurance will be lower on a $25K vehicle, as well as maintenance. While it will not fully fund college, not driving an BMW will go a LONG WAY towards helping fund college. All for just swapping to a safe reliable decent vehicle instead of luxury. $25-30K will get you a very nice CRV/Accord type vehicle and those will last for 10+ years without many issues. But sure, go ahead buy your $50-60K BMW and complain you can't afford stuff.

And yes, I know people who spend $100/week at Starbucks, add up the family (2 adults and 2-3 kids) and it might be $150/week. That's $600/month. So add that to your $100K+ from car changes and you are saving $6 K more per year (I'll give you the extra $1k as treats/cost of making coffee/drinks at home).

So while you think it's ridiculous, I think the fact people spend $7K+ a year at Starbucks and complain they can't afford college to be ridiculous. Because they have plenty of things to be more frugal with and still live well and have the ability to save.

When I grew up poor/LMC, we ate out 1-2x/month and all other meals were at home. I packed my lunch for school for 12 years, I didn't get to stop at Starbucks (or the 1980's equivalents) with my friends as I did NOT have the money. We did not have cable, my parents got their first color TV in 1995. I had a "car to drive". It came with the privilege of knowing if it was cold morning, the heat/defrost might not work so I would have to pull over 2-3 times on the 6 mile drive to school to scrap my windshield so I could safely see/drive. Also knew how to have friends help me "push the same car" so I could pop the clutch and get it started many times since calling someone to do jump start cost $$.

Yet somehow, my parents still managed to find $5K (about 13% of their pretax income) to contribute towards my college each year and also pay for my books and airfare 2x/school year (to school in Aug, home/back for xmas and back again in May)So overall they managed to come up with ~$7-8K when they made less than $50K. They worked 2nd jobs and lived as frugally as possible and I contributed another $4-5K plus work study and loans each year.


I actually think this is decent advice in general, but some of us are only buying the $25k car (or less!) because that’s what we can afford to begin with, so there bo magical $35k savings from the purchase?

If lots folks are really spending $7k per year on Starbucks, ok fine. I don’t know anyone like that. I probably get coffee out 1-2x per month, and mostly from a local shop, so that’s maybe $100 annually to cut.

Our decisions are a bit more like, do we really need swim lessons during the school year? Does the roof really need to be replaced now?


This. Same position. We maybe get a couple of holiday starbucks in December. One of our cars is over 10 years old and has 200K miles on it. We are in our home that we bought over 20 years ago and never "upgraded." Our expenses are more mundane as the other poster notes. And, no, we are not able to save $50-$80K/year for college. Just because some anonymous person on here thinks I should live in a way that forces to put every cent to college savings doesn't mean I can or should have to.


No one is forcing you to. But it's up to you to figure out how to put your kid thru college. There are plenty of affordable ways. And if you want the 80K/year school, then you had to prepare. Otherwise you should send your kid to where you as a family can afford. There are plenty of choices that are only $30K/year.

Btw, you don't need to save $50-80K/year. If you save since they are little, even $10K/year goes a really long way towards funding college. But if you don't plan and wait until they are teens, their affordable options are less. But there are still many ways to get an education.




Only 10k a year?

We made 100k HH for many years, which paid for a mortgage for a 1400 square foot house in Sterling, and two cars. Kids are in rec sports, no tutoring. We eat out once or twice a month. Our families are overseas, so we did spend around 2k a year on plane tickets.
There were no 10k to save. We now make around 160k, but the house needs repairs and the cars will need to be replaced.
Kids will attend community college and then hopefully transfer overseas.


This is almost exactly where we are. We save what we can, but it's more like 5k/year per kid (we still have one in day care so there goes another 15k). I promise you we're not overspending. That said we are fine with our kids going to state schools or less selective colleges and dont complain about donut holes. We obviously are doing OK but haven't won the rat race ourselves despite Ivy League degrees, and we know plenty of people within our own families who have to start with community college and wind up successful adults.

I also just don't see this as an "every man for himself" thing, if 20 years from now things have gotten so bad that kids with college degrees literally can't pay for food and housing that will be an issue of massive inequality that we need to change on a collective political level. There I said my piece.

Anonymous
For most people I know in real life, the anger and frustration comes from two main places.

First - colleges have gotten so much more expensive so quickly. And the cost is one of the very few things in life where what you are charged depends on some opaque calculation that the school makes based on limited information. And you really have no idea what they are going to charge. You can research and learn that x% of students get x% of aid but that doesn't tell you what your student will get (merit or need). The NPCs are not great if you don't fit into the usual categories, and they don't always show merit aid. So you have to apply in order to learn what they are going to charge you. And by then your student has invested time and energy in order to show interest and write a "why this school" essay and is invested in it. Then you have to say no because whatever magic calculation the school did comes out different that your guess. That is wrong and frustrating. All these luxury goods analogies only make sense if the dealership is making up significantly different prices for every person who walks in the door based on vague criteria.

and second - I don't think most people are bothered by the truly low income students getting a different price. For most people I know it's when you see the neighbor or classmate who you've known for years getting a different price. You've seen the house remodel or the new cars or the boats or the vacation photos. But now suddenly this family is getting significant aid. Maybe it's legitimate, maybe they are lying, but that is when the people I know get annoyed. When they seem someone who appears to be in the same bucket as they are getting charged a significantly different amount.

I do agree that not everyone is "owed" an expensive private school education. Most middle income families can make something work at a lower ranked school, and that is fine. It is just frustrating when the colleges play the games with pricing and then you watch your neighbor get a different cost.

As far as saving and making choices - these arguments get ridiculous. I had spontaneous twins. It was not my choice to have two kids in school at the same time, but there it is. I didn't choose to have 3 out 4 grandparents get sick/need support/pass away (no inheritance). I didn't choose for one child to have significant medical needs not covered by insurance. I didn't choose for our income to increase just as our kids are becoming college aged. It is what it is and we will do what we need to do, but for many many people, it isn't about cutting out Starbucks.
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: