2024 Democratic National Convention

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?

Anyone?

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.

+1

They are locked in on Christian nationalism and are playing the long game.

Scare tactics don’t work on people who can’t afford rent or groceries or transportation or medical care or prescription drugs or every other necessity.

Pundits said the exact same thing in the Germany in the 1930's.

Calling people nazis doesn’t work anymore, either. Calling people russians doesn’t work anymore. You and yours will keep doing it, though. Your candidate was going to lose, so you inserted Kamala, who has nothing and is actively being hidden ie no interviews, one paltry debate, no press conferences, have to start a rumor about Beyoncé performing to ensure people show up/watch.

Of course you will continue to ride the nazi/russian train, because that’s all dems have.

Sorry you’re having a bad day

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?

Anyone?

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.

+1

They are locked in on Christian nationalism and are playing the long game.

Scare tactics don’t work on people who can’t afford rent or groceries or transportation or medical care or prescription drugs or every other necessity.

Pundits said the exact same thing in the Germany in the 1930's.

Calling people nazis doesn’t work anymore, either. Calling people russians doesn’t work anymore. You and yours will keep doing it, though. Your candidate was going to lose, so you inserted Kamala, who has nothing and is actively being hidden ie no interviews, one paltry debate, no press conferences, have to start a rumor about Beyoncé performing to ensure people show up/watch.

Of course you will continue to ride the nazi/russian train, because that’s all dems have.

Here's the thing people saying everyone tuned in for Beyonce don't seem to realize. The largest number of people tuned in WHILE HARRIS WAS SPEAKING. Unless you think people were waiting for Beyonce to bust out in the middle of the speech and start singing, this theory that everyone tuned in for the singer, does not hold water.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?

Anyone?

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.

+1

They are locked in on Christian nationalism and are playing the long game.

Scare tactics don’t work on people who can’t afford rent or groceries or transportation or medical care or prescription drugs or every other necessity.

Pundits said the exact same thing in the Germany in the 1930's.

Calling people nazis doesn’t work anymore, either. Calling people russians doesn’t work anymore. You and yours will keep doing it, though. Your candidate was going to lose, so you inserted Kamala, who has nothing and is actively being hidden ie no interviews, one paltry debate, no press conferences, have to start a rumor about Beyoncé performing to ensure people show up/watch.

Of course you will continue to ride the nazi/russian train, because that’s all dems have.

Sorry you’re having a bad day

Sorry your candidate is so unpopular that a fake Beyoncè performance was necessary to ensure she had an audience.

Kamala didn’t get a single delegate during actual primary voting and was the first to run out of cash and drop out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?

Anyone?

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.

+1

They are locked in on Christian nationalism and are playing the long game.

Scare tactics don’t work on people who can’t afford rent or groceries or transportation or medical care or prescription drugs or every other necessity.

Pundits said the exact same thing in the Germany in the 1930's.

Calling people nazis doesn’t work anymore, either. Calling people russians doesn’t work anymore. You and yours will keep doing it, though. Your candidate was going to lose, so you inserted Kamala, who has nothing and is actively being hidden ie no interviews, one paltry debate, no press conferences, have to start a rumor about Beyoncé performing to ensure people show up/watch.

Of course you will continue to ride the nazi/russian train, because that’s all dems have.

Sorry you’re having a bad day

Sorry your candidate is so unpopular that a fake Beyoncè performance was necessary to ensure she had an audience.

Kamala didn’t get a single delegate during actual primary voting and was the first to run out of cash and drop out.

Complaining about a Beyoncé rumor? Trump supporters are flailing. Probably because they support a candidate who tried to overthrow our government. That kind of cognitive dissonance makes people weird and desperate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?

Anyone?

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.

+1

They are locked in on Christian nationalism and are playing the long game.

Scare tactics don’t work on people who can’t afford rent or groceries or transportation or medical care or prescription drugs or every other necessity.

Pundits said the exact same thing in the Germany in the 1930's.

Calling people nazis doesn’t work anymore, either. Calling people russians doesn’t work anymore. You and yours will keep doing it, though. Your candidate was going to lose, so you inserted Kamala, who has nothing and is actively being hidden ie no interviews, one paltry debate, no press conferences, have to start a rumor about Beyoncé performing to ensure people show up/watch.

Of course you will continue to ride the nazi/russian train, because that’s all dems have.

It has been an embarrassing 2024 election for the Dems but GOP nominated Trump for a third consecutive POTUS election and nothing could be more humiliating than that.

[Anonymous]

Why did MAGAs start the Beyonce rumor?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?

Anyone?

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.

+1

They are locked in on Christian nationalism and are playing the long game.

Scare tactics don’t work on people who can’t afford rent or groceries or transportation or medical care or prescription drugs or every other necessity.

Pundits said the exact same thing in the Germany in the 1930's.

Calling people nazis doesn’t work anymore, either. Calling people russians doesn’t work anymore. You and yours will keep doing it, though. Your candidate was going to lose, so you inserted Kamala, who has nothing and is actively being hidden ie no interviews, one paltry debate, no press conferences, have to start a rumor about Beyoncé performing to ensure people show up/watch.

Of course you will continue to ride the nazi/russian train, because that’s all dems have.

Sorry you’re having a bad day

Sorry your candidate is so unpopular that a fake Beyoncè performance was necessary to ensure she had an audience.

Kamala didn’t get a single delegate during actual primary voting and was the first to run out of cash and drop out.

Uh that was four years ago - multiple lifetimes in politics. She's been VP for almost four years and had one of the greatest turnarounds in political history. If she wins, it'll be remembered to be up there with Truman's reelection and studied by political scientists for decades. Tell me you have nothing to criticize without telling me you have nothing to criticize. You're supporting a tired, boring, old man whose shtick is wearing then even with his supporters. Good luck with that!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?

Anyone?

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.

+1

They are locked in on Christian nationalism and are playing the long game.

Scare tactics don’t work on people who can’t afford rent or groceries or transportation or medical care or prescription drugs or every other necessity.

Pundits said the exact same thing in the Germany in the 1930's.

Calling people nazis doesn’t work anymore, either. Calling people russians doesn’t work anymore. You and yours will keep doing it, though. Your candidate was going to lose, so you inserted Kamala, who has nothing and is actively being hidden ie no interviews, one paltry debate, no press conferences, have to start a rumor about Beyoncé performing to ensure people show up/watch.

Of course you will continue to ride the nazi/russian train, because that’s all dems have.

It has been an embarrassing 2024 election for the Dems but GOP nominated Trump for a third consecutive POTUS election and nothing could be more humiliating than that.

As a reminder, he basically had an inside straight draw the first time and has cost the GOP every election since 2016.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did MAGAs start the Beyonce rumor?

Citation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did MAGAs start the Beyonce rumor?

Emmy Ruiz (born 1983/1984)[1] is an American political advisor serving as the White House director of political strategy and outreach for President Joe Biden.

On September 23, 2022, Ruiz was elevated to be an assistant to the president.[8] She is one of the key political advisors to the President remaining in Washington as the 2024 campaign staffs up.[9]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmy_Ruiz


Harris hires ex-Clinton aide Ruiz and several other women of color


Sen. Kamala Harris is adding several women of color to her presidential campaign team, an aide told POLITICO.

Emmy Ruiz, a political strategist who served as Hillary Clinton’s state director in Nevada and Colorado in 2016, will be a senior adviser to Harris. Ruiz will counsel the campaign on electoral, political and field strategy.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/20/kamala-harris-2020-staff-1176679

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did MAGAs start the Beyonce rumor?

Emmy Ruiz (born 1983/1984)[1] is an American political advisor serving as the White House director of political strategy and outreach for President Joe Biden.

On September 23, 2022, Ruiz was elevated to be an assistant to the president.[8] She is one of the key political advisors to the President remaining in Washington as the 2024 campaign staffs up.[9]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmy_Ruiz


Harris hires ex-Clinton aide Ruiz and several other women of color


Sen. Kamala Harris is adding several women of color to her presidential campaign team, an aide told POLITICO.

Emmy Ruiz, a political strategist who served as Hillary Clinton’s state director in Nevada and Colorado in 2016, will be a senior adviser to Harris. Ruiz will counsel the campaign on electoral, political and field strategy.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/20/kamala-harris-2020-staff-1176679

Who the f&2k cares? That's all you have? Like seriously? Didn't Trump just use AI to show a fake Taylor Swift endorsing him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is full of it— trying to sell herself as a blue collar kid? Her mom a cancer researcher, her dad a professor. Unbelievable.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/23/fact-check-dnc-kamala-harris-day-4/

She lived in a multicultural red-lined neighborhood. Her single mom, her, and her sister lived in an apartment above a daycare. She was bused to school. Her neighbors were firefighters. The village that helped raise her was blue collar. Even if her parents were professionals she didn't grow up in a white collar environmental.

Also, do you really think her minority parents were paid equal pay to other researchers and professors? Her speech didn't say blue collar, she said middle class.

From 12-17 she lived in Montreal while her mother was a professor at McGill. Crickets about that in her speech because it doesn’t fit the narrative.

Including that would not have taken away from her speech. Sad that her mother had to leave America for a better lifestyle.

Tweens don't get to pick where they live. What is important is that when she could decide for herself, she returned to America to attend Howard University (HBCU) and selected a career of service.

And by the way, where was her father on the biggest night of her life? Oh that's right. They hate each other.

So you're unqualified to be president if you're estranged from a parent? What a ridiculous comment.

+1 her father wasn't around and she adored her mother. Not exactly unusual. Also evidently he's cold, critical, and humorless.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/20/kamala-harris-father-pot-1176805

She needs him for exactly nothing.

Harris is a decent person and perhaps her father is too. Her father probably loves her and misses his baby but he is likely disappointed in the fact that his daughter is now a bought and paid for puppet of one of our two awful major political parties.

Please provide one shred of evidence that Kamala is a "decent person," as most people would define that. And by the way, her father is a Marxist.

The convention was full of stories about how she’s a decent person. My favorite was Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s. And if he’s a Marxist it’s good that they’re estranged, no?

Yes, I'm sure at the hand-picked, carefully curated convention where people will say anything to get stage time, they all had nice things to say about her.

Why don't we ask one of the 92% of her staff in the VP's office who has quit in the last 3.5 years because of her screaming, bullying and belligerence, if they think she is a "decent person?"

The people who left were part of the prior Chief of Staff team. You realize trump had 44 cabinet members in his 4 years, and 41 of them are not endorsing this candidacy. And he wanted his Vice President dead.

Nice try, but incorrect. Obviously, you missed the scathing article in Politico about what a narcissistic horror she is to work with.

Someone with an axe to grind reached out to a right leaning publication and they pushed out an article that you fully believe.

Sorry, my mistake. It was not Politico that broke the story of how much Kamala's staff hates her, it was the definitely-not-right-wing-leaning Washington Post itself. Perhaps it is time to start circulating this article from Dec 2021 again:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/12/04/kamala-harris-staff-departures/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?

Anyone?

Read Thomas’ concurrence opinion in Dobbs. Some Republicans have agreed and said that gay marriage should be revisited now that SCOTUS has the votes to reverse Obergerfell. Alito, Thomas and Roberts voted in 2015, against gay marriage. They now have Barrett and Kavanaugh for the votes. We know scotus have no respect for precedent.

Honestly, I don’t think Barret, would side with the conservative majority if this came to the court. She is a not nearly as partisan as the other conservative justices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?

Anyone?

Read Thomas’ concurrence opinion in Dobbs. Some Republicans have agreed and said that gay marriage should be revisited now that SCOTUS has the votes to reverse Obergerfell. Alito, Thomas and Roberts voted in 2015, against gay marriage. They now have Barrett and Kavanaugh for the votes. We know scotus have no respect for precedent.

Honestly, I don’t think Barret, would side with the conservative majority if this came to the court. She is a not nearly as partisan as the other conservative justices.

You think a woman who is a literal handmaiden in her whackadoo religion is going to somehow be less partisan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?

Anyone?

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.

project 2025 is not associated with trump. He has disavowed it many times

The man lies so much, you don’t know when he is telling his truth or another lie. How do you know he is speaking truth now. What we do know is that the architects of Project 2025 are former members of Trumps White House, the far-right Heritage Foundation, and the republican vice president nominee. So you want people to take the word of a habitual LIAR when the proof is in the pudding that he is for it. We also know that trump agrees with the last person in the room and is easily persuaded by flattery and money.

Trump privately supports Project 2025 because his followers support it.

He also support QAnon because it helped with the white, suburban housewife vote.

He’s lying again. He still supporting Project 2025.