Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Why would any of them want to marry Harry? Nothing in it for them.

But those and Margo Robbie are not phony at all and some enormously successful and talented. You make no sense.

DP. It does make sense. The more successful you are the more you would have to give up to join the royal family. Or do you think grannie is going to let Harry’s wife appear topless/scantily clad in things like “Wolf of Wall Street” and Game of thrones?

Acting careers tend to fade once you're past early 30s, especially A list females. Harry could have stretched the engagement out if her career was that important. The point is Margo is the caliber of woman Harry should have been gunning for. Instead he married this money grubbing nobody and the results are predictable.

If she’s the caliber of woman he should aim for, you think very poorly of Harry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No independently rich, beautiful and successful woman wanted to marry either of Charles’s sons.

It was literally the lifelong fantasy of basically every millennial woman in the West.

let’s say that this is true but Harry is not interested in millions of average women. the pool of women who interest him
is very small and as they all age very few of them remain available. he would be able to find a young good looking rando till the end of his life but that is not what interests him.

Well, he married a rando, didn't he?

no, he didn’t. he married an a fairly accomplished actress. not an A lister for sure but it’s a very cutthroat industry where she managed to do well.

Meghan reportedly made around $5 million in the course of her acting career on Suits - $50K per episode and then a bunch more money for brand sponsorship, her two fashion lines, and her "lifestyle" stuff.

I went to NYU with a ton of out-of-work actors who would desperately love her supposed "D-list" success of $5 million. If she wasn't married to Harry, she could easily retire as a single mom assuming she wisely invested her money.

Not maintaining the lifestyle and appearances to which she aspires. Nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No independently rich, beautiful and successful woman wanted to marry either of Charles’s sons.

It was literally the lifelong fantasy of basically every millennial woman in the West.

let’s say that this is true but Harry is not interested in millions of average women. the pool of women who interest him
is very small and as they all age very few of them remain available. he would be able to find a young good looking rando till the end of his life but that is not what interests him.

Well, he married a rando, didn't he?

no, he didn’t. he married an a fairly accomplished actress. not an A lister for sure but it’s a very cutthroat industry where she managed to do well.

Meghan reportedly made around $5 million in the course of her acting career on Suits - $50K per episode and then a bunch more money for brand sponsorship, her two fashion lines, and her "lifestyle" stuff.

I went to NYU with a ton of out-of-work actors who would desperately love her supposed "D-list" success of $5 million. If she wasn't married to Harry, she could easily retire as a single mom assuming she wisely invested her money.

And Harry has $33 million of his own money. They have plenty of money of their own, without a dime from the Crown.

They currently spend 3.3 million a year from the Duchy of Cornwall plus the Sovereign grant. This excludes security, travel and housing. $33M goes fast if they no longer get those things.

MM can make $3.3 in a year as an actress. The move from TV to movies is a cakewalk for her at this point.

Because there so many 40-something actresses raking it in Hollywood.

$3M a year isn't really 'raking' it in by Hollywood standards and Meghan's fame levels - if she chose to act - $10 million a year would be a baseline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No independently rich, beautiful and successful woman wanted to marry either of Charles’s sons.

It was literally the lifelong fantasy of basically every millennial woman in the West.

let’s say that this is true but Harry is not interested in millions of average women. the pool of women who interest him
is very small and as they all age very few of them remain available. he would be able to find a young good looking rando till the end of his life but that is not what interests him.

Well, he married a rando, didn't he?

no, he didn’t. he married an a fairly accomplished actress. not an A lister for sure but it’s a very cutthroat industry where she managed to do well.

Meghan reportedly made around $5 million in the course of her acting career on Suits - $50K per episode and then a bunch more money for brand sponsorship, her two fashion lines, and her "lifestyle" stuff.

I went to NYU with a ton of out-of-work actors who would desperately love her supposed "D-list" success of $5 million. If she wasn't married to Harry, she could easily retire as a single mom assuming she wisely invested her money.

And Harry has $33 million of his own money. They have plenty of money of their own, without a dime from the Crown.

They currently spend 3.3 million a year from the Duchy of Cornwall plus the Sovereign grant. This excludes security, travel and housing. $33M goes fast if they no longer get those things.

MM can make $3.3 in a year as an actress. The move from TV to movies is a cakewalk for her at this point.

Because there so many 40-something actresses raking it in Hollywood.

$3M a year isn't really 'raking' it in by Hollywood standards and Meghan's fame levels - if she chose to act - $10 million a year would be a baseline.

It will only take her bombing one movie for that ship to sail. She will be a major draw to a film once. After that she'll have to rely on her acting skills which were never enough to warrant a leading role before. Not sure why you think she will suddenly be a better actress now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No independently rich, beautiful and successful woman wanted to marry either of Charles’s sons.

It was literally the lifelong fantasy of basically every millennial woman in the West.

let’s say that this is true but Harry is not interested in millions of average women. the pool of women who interest him
is very small and as they all age very few of them remain available. he would be able to find a young good looking rando till the end of his life but that is not what interests him.

Well, he married a rando, didn't he?

no, he didn’t. he married an a fairly accomplished actress. not an A lister for sure but it’s a very cutthroat industry where she managed to do well.

Meghan reportedly made around $5 million in the course of her acting career on Suits - $50K per episode and then a bunch more money for brand sponsorship, her two fashion lines, and her "lifestyle" stuff.

I went to NYU with a ton of out-of-work actors who would desperately love her supposed "D-list" success of $5 million. If she wasn't married to Harry, she could easily retire as a single mom assuming she wisely invested her money.

And Harry has $33 million of his own money. They have plenty of money of their own, without a dime from the Crown.

They currently spend 3.3 million a year from the Duchy of Cornwall plus the Sovereign grant. This excludes security, travel and housing. $33M goes fast if they no longer get those things.

MM can make $3.3 in a year as an actress. The move from TV to movies is a cakewalk for her at this point.

Because there so many 40-something actresses raking it in Hollywood.

$3M a year isn't really 'raking' it in by Hollywood standards and Meghan's fame levels - if she chose to act - $10 million a year would be a baseline.

It will only take her bombing one movie for that ship to sail. She will be a major draw to a film once. After that she'll have to rely on her acting skills which were never enough to warrant a leading role before. Not sure why you think she will suddenly be a better actress now.

She's already 38. It's too late to become a hollywood star.

And if she goes into acting, that's the end of any of her royal affiliation, even for Harry.

I'd have a lot more respect if their goal was to move to a quiet island, have a farm, spend most of their time with themselves, kids and dogs and a close circle of friends, do some low level environmental stuff and pop back to the UK periodically for a family event like all the other royals do. But that's not what they want. And the idea that they're going to cash in on royal status to build a $100 million fortune is a bit hypocritical. Because that's exactly what it is, using the royal brand to rake in money, not saving the environment. It's what parasites do.

They have a very fine line to walk between the honorable and the grifter. And Meghan should have known all this before she married Harry because whether she likes it or not, Harry is royal. But she was either unwilling, obtuse or is indeed manipulative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No independently rich, beautiful and successful woman wanted to marry either of Charles’s sons.

It was literally the lifelong fantasy of basically every millennial woman in the West.

let’s say that this is true but Harry is not interested in millions of average women. the pool of women who interest him
is very small and as they all age very few of them remain available. he would be able to find a young good looking rando till the end of his life but that is not what interests him.

Well, he married a rando, didn't he?

no, he didn’t. he married an a fairly accomplished actress. not an A lister for sure but it’s a very cutthroat industry where she managed to do well.

Meghan reportedly made around $5 million in the course of her acting career on Suits - $50K per episode and then a bunch more money for brand sponsorship, her two fashion lines, and her "lifestyle" stuff.

I went to NYU with a ton of out-of-work actors who would desperately love her supposed "D-list" success of $5 million. If she wasn't married to Harry, she could easily retire as a single mom assuming she wisely invested her money.

And Harry has $33 million of his own money. They have plenty of money of their own, without a dime from the Crown.

They currently spend 3.3 million a year from the Duchy of Cornwall plus the Sovereign grant. This excludes security, travel and housing. $33M goes fast if they no longer get those things.

MM can make $3.3 in a year as an actress. The move from TV to movies is a cakewalk for her at this point.

Because there so many 40-something actresses raking it in Hollywood.

$3M a year isn't really 'raking' it in by Hollywood standards and Meghan's fame levels - if she chose to act - $10 million a year would be a baseline.

It will only take her bombing one movie for that ship to sail. She will be a major draw to a film once. After that she'll have to rely on her acting skills which were never enough to warrant a leading role before. Not sure why you think she will suddenly be a better actress now.

She's already 38. It's too late to become a hollywood star.

And if she goes into acting, that's the end of any of her royal affiliation, even for Harry.

I'd have a lot more respect if their goal was to move to a quiet island, have a farm, spend most of their time with themselves, kids and dogs and a close circle of friends, do some low level environmental stuff and pop back to the UK periodically for a family event like all the other royals do. But that's not what they want. And the idea that they're going to cash in on royal status to build a $100 million fortune is a bit hypocritical. Because that's exactly what it is, using the royal brand to rake in money, not saving the environment. It's what parasites do.

They have a very fine line to walk between the honorable and the grifter. And Meghan should have known all this before she married Harry because whether she likes it or not, Harry is royal. But she was either unwilling, obtuse or is indeed manipulative.

She is just having a mental breakdown. Big ego, big self-induced expectations but inability to cope with royal life (and the scheming and politics that come along with it).

[Anonymous]

If the British press is what sent her over the edge, I'd hate to see what will happen to her once they're exposed to the American, British and Canadian presses. You can only plant so many positive pieces on yourself (hello People!). Do they really think their press will be majority positive in every other country except for Britain after this? Seems so presumptuous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the British press is what sent her over the edge, I'd hate to see what will happen to her once they're exposed to the American, British and Canadian presses. You can only plant so many positive pieces on yourself (hello People!). Do they really think their press will be majority positive in every other country except for Britain after this? Seems so presumptuous.

North American press aren't sycophants and for the most part don't even care about celebrities (except for TMZ)

NYC and LA (most major US cities) are legendary for having large numbers of famous people who regular people just let go about their days.

The press will request interviews through the proper channels but I don't see CNN/the Chicago Tribune/New York Times writing hateful rhetoric day-in and out like the British Royal Rota did.

The British press however will have to find another focus in order to get all their money for clicks though. Good luck to the rest of the royal family back in the UK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the British press is what sent her over the edge, I'd hate to see what will happen to her once they're exposed to the American, British and Canadian presses. You can only plant so many positive pieces on yourself (hello People!). Do they really think their press will be majority positive in every other country except for Britain after this? Seems so presumptuous.

North American press aren't sycophants and for the most part don't even care about celebrities (except for TMZ)

NYC and LA (most major US cities) are legendary for having large numbers of famous people who regular people just let go about their days.

The press will request interviews through the proper channels but I don't see CNN/the Chicago Tribune/New York Times writing hateful rhetoric day-in and out like the British Royal Rota did.

The British press however will have to find another focus in order to get all their money for clicks though. Good luck to the rest of the royal family back in the UK.

But she’ll be a smaller fish in a bigger pond. Which I’m not sure is what she wants. Once they’ve attended a few events, people will be over them. Especially since I don’t believe they will be doing much work, charitable or otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the British press is what sent her over the edge, I'd hate to see what will happen to her once they're exposed to the American, British and Canadian presses. You can only plant so many positive pieces on yourself (hello People!). Do they really think their press will be majority positive in every other country except for Britain after this? Seems so presumptuous.

North American press aren't sycophants and for the most part don't even care about celebrities (except for TMZ)

NYC and LA (most major US cities) are legendary for having large numbers of famous people who regular people just let go about their days.

The press will request interviews through the proper channels but I don't see CNN/the Chicago Tribune/New York Times writing hateful rhetoric day-in and out like the British Royal Rota did.

The British press however will have to find another focus in order to get all their money for clicks though. Good luck to the rest of the royal family back in the UK.

But she’ll be a smaller fish in a bigger pond. Which I’m not sure is what she wants. Once they’ve attended a few events, people will be over them. Especially since I don’t believe they will be doing much work, charitable or otherwise.

Here's the thing about being a smaller fish in a bigger pond. Meghan isn't complacent. She thrives on working with and interacting with individuals doing greater things than her. You can see it in the people she befriends (and yes - those she abandons/leaves behind).

So I don't think that is a downside. In CEO culture that just encourages you to do better yourself.

We'll see what the Sussexes get up to. It's only the first two weeks of 2020 and its already exciting. Looks like they'll hit 11 million followers on Instagram by the end of the month. I have to wonder how close 20 million is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the British press is what sent her over the edge, I'd hate to see what will happen to her once they're exposed to the American, British and Canadian presses. You can only plant so many positive pieces on yourself (hello People!). Do they really think their press will be majority positive in every other country except for Britain after this? Seems so presumptuous.

Stepping back from public life is one thing. Intending to step back and live quietly, out of the spotlight is a legitimate desire. I wouldn’t want to live in a fishbowl. But if they intend to make $$$ via the Sussex “brand”, they will have to stay in the spotlight and will desperately need that news coverage. Seems a bit disingenuous.

[Anonymous]

Maybe the Royal Rota could target the deserving (Andrew), but I bet the knives will be out for Kate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love that the statement is basically "Harry and his wife are choosing to remain in the family (lower case) and be independent and the Royal Family bank will be closing"
Note that she personalized them with their NAMES and not their titles. She lower cased the "f" in family and upper cased it in stating they are leaving the Royal Family.
The shade the English use is amazing. Sorry Megs. You chose the wrong suitcase.

Subtext is de rigeur for the British and no one does it better than the Queen. We love you, you are part of the family, but you are out of the family business.

But she did say "the Sussexes".

Agree that it was a very well written statement. Lol. ‘Family’ v ‘family’. You are either in or you are out.

aint that the truth

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe the Royal Rota could target the deserving (Andrew), but I bet the knives will be out for Kate.

Well, Wills kind of soft-threw her under the bus this morning.

I noticed that an article specifically noted that it was the DUCHESS of Cambridge Private Secretary Christian Jones who was a source of the leaked rumors.

But wills & kate share him. The paparazzi also went after her in her school runs twice today when they usually leave her alone.

To think - all of this could have been avoided had those two supported their ILs facing the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I TOLD YOU!!!! They Queen is allowing them to move forward with the plan.

Official statement released from the Queen of the United Kingdom.

Yup, she rolled like a felled log. LOL.

Uh, that statement says nothing as we predicted. It gives no answers to any of the questions.

Dp- that they get to keep their titles, stay in the fam, move, and do less.

The titles won't be revoked for sure. Not sure why people were speculating that. Titles are for life. They are only revoked if you do something treasonous. There were some German princes with British titles and those titles were revoked during WWI.

But they are leaving the RF. Looks like they aren't going to do royal duties. The whole thing about funding independence makes that clear. Harry might still do some every now as part of a show with Wil, but Meghan ain't opening up any more hospitals or meeting victims of fire.

I hope they lose royal housing and the allowance from Charles. They are insufferable.

If every parent cut off their insufferable children, DC would have very few trust fund kids or inherited wealth. PP, you sound insufferable, so did your parents do what you suggest and cut you off?