Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

So, you would just like it ignored?

Karlan was way out of line on this. And, her apology was pathetic.

I never would have heard about that line about Barron if it weren't for Melania and people like you. I'm sure Barron is thanking them tonight for ensuring he is topic no. 1 on the news. It's like people who felt they couldn't never say Barron are now suddenly unable to stop saying his name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

So, you would just like it ignored?

Karlan was way out of line on this. And, her apology was pathetic.

Better than any apology Trump has ever given. Oh wait...

It was an apology begrudgingly given after receiving a bunch of negative publicity, coupled with a "whatabout" disclaimer.

So? It is straight from the Republican playbook so you should love it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

Thanks to her I learned her son was drawn into politics today! She has done her motherly duty by spreading this far and wide! So much for privacy, especially with the campaign and the Trump Administration News Network (aka FOX) running with it. They're all making sure Barron is in the spotlight and trending on Twitter!

If you watched the testimony you would have learned it then. The laughter of some in the room was your indicator that it was political.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

So, you would just like it ignored?

Karlan was way out of line on this. And, her apology was pathetic.

Better than any apology Trump has ever given. Oh wait...

It was an apology begrudgingly given after receiving a bunch of negative publicity, coupled with a "whatabout" disclaimer.

Still better than any apology Trump has ever given. You can't dispute that.

Or give an example of a Trump apology you think is better and more sincere. Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

Thanks to her I learned her son was drawn into politics today! She has done her motherly duty by spreading this far and wide! So much for privacy, especially with the campaign and the Trump Administration News Network (aka FOX) running with it. They're all making sure Barron is in the spotlight and trending on Twitter!

If you watched the testimony you would have learned it then. The laughter of some in the room was your indicator that it was political.

Er, laughter means a phrase is witty or funny, not political.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

Thanks to her I learned her son was drawn into politics today! She has done her motherly duty by spreading this far and wide! So much for privacy, especially with the campaign and the Trump Administration News Network (aka FOX) running with it. They're all making sure Barron is in the spotlight and trending on Twitter!

If you watched the testimony you would have learned it then. The laughter of some in the room was your indicator that it was political.

Most of America did not watch the testimony. You must be inside the Beltway.

But now most of America is talking about Barron. Thanks to Melania's tweet and FOX news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

Thanks to her I learned her son was drawn into politics today! She has done her motherly duty by spreading this far and wide! So much for privacy, especially with the campaign and the Trump Administration News Network (aka FOX) running with it. They're all making sure Barron is in the spotlight and trending on Twitter!

If you watched the testimony you would have learned it then. The laughter of some in the room was your indicator that it was political.

Most of America did not watch the testimony. You must be inside the Beltway.

But now most of America is talking about Barron. Thanks to Melania's tweet and FOX news.

No, thanks to the testimony. That occurred first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

Thanks to her I learned her son was drawn into politics today! She has done her motherly duty by spreading this far and wide! So much for privacy, especially with the campaign and the Trump Administration News Network (aka FOX) running with it. They're all making sure Barron is in the spotlight and trending on Twitter!

If you watched the testimony you would have learned it then. The laughter of some in the room was your indicator that it was political.

Most of America did not watch the testimony. You must be inside the Beltway.

But now most of America is talking about Barron. Thanks to Melania's tweet and FOX news.

No, thanks to the testimony. That occurred first.

Sure but again, for those who are a little slow, had Melania not tweeted about it and FOX news not make it their no. 1 story tonight, no one would be talking about it. SO much for Barron's privacy.

[Anonymous]

Did Trump ever apologize for his nastiness to Greta Thunberg, also a child?

Apparently Republicans don't care about children if they're not Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

So, you would just like it ignored?

Karlan was way out of line on this. And, her apology was pathetic.

Better than any apology Trump has ever given. Oh wait...

It was an apology begrudgingly given after receiving a bunch of negative publicity, coupled with a "whatabout" disclaimer.

Still better than any apology Trump has ever given. You can't dispute that.

Or give an example of a Trump apology you think is better and more sincere. Thanks.

Who's disputing it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump ever apologize for his nastiness to Greta Thunberg, also a child?

Apparently Republicans don't care about children if they're not Republicans.

He should have. Doesn't change what happened today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

Thanks to her I learned her son was drawn into politics today! She has done her motherly duty by spreading this far and wide! So much for privacy, especially with the campaign and the Trump Administration News Network (aka FOX) running with it. They're all making sure Barron is in the spotlight and trending on Twitter!

If you watched the testimony you would have learned it then. The laughter of some in the room was your indicator that it was political.

Most of America did not watch the testimony. You must be inside the Beltway.

But now most of America is talking about Barron. Thanks to Melania's tweet and FOX news.

No, thanks to the testimony. That occurred first.

Sure but again, for those who are a little slow, had Melania not tweeted about it and FOX news not make it their no. 1 story tonight, no one would be talking about it. SO much for Barron's privacy.

And for those even a bit slower, the privacy was gone as soon as he was mentioned in public testimony. For no reason other than to crack a joke at the Trump's expense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump ever apologize for his nastiness to Greta Thunberg, also a child?

Apparently Republicans don't care about children if they're not Republicans.

He should have. Doesn't change what happened today.

Nope, it doesn't. But it is impossible to take your complaints seriously when they are so politicized...
What are you looking for here? An apology? You won't get one. It's a Trump world now. Buck up, buttercup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

Thanks to her I learned her son was drawn into politics today! She has done her motherly duty by spreading this far and wide! So much for privacy, especially with the campaign and the Trump Administration News Network (aka FOX) running with it. They're all making sure Barron is in the spotlight and trending on Twitter!

If you watched the testimony you would have learned it then. The laughter of some in the room was your indicator that it was political.

Most of America did not watch the testimony. You must be inside the Beltway.

But now most of America is talking about Barron. Thanks to Melania's tweet and FOX news.

No, thanks to the testimony. That occurred first.

Sure but again, for those who are a little slow, had Melania not tweeted about it and FOX news not make it their no. 1 story tonight, no one would be talking about it. SO much for Barron's privacy.

And for those even a bit slower, the privacy was gone as soon as he was mentioned in public testimony. For no reason other than to crack a joke at the Trump's expense.

He shouldn't have been mentioned but, you're going off about something strange here. His privacy? We all know he exists. He shows up for photo ops occasionally, as the First Family does. Aside from that, he has privacy, yesterday, today, and tomorrow.

[Anonymous]

Instead of the Rs contesting the facts of the impeachment inquiry, they are busy discussing something said about Barron (and it wasn't an attack of him, but a pun playing off his name). In fact, the Rs did not contest any of the facts put forth in the witness testimony. None. They have instead contested the process. Their argument is weak, weak, weak. They have no real argument so far.