Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When Melania goes to Twitter and posts a message like this, you know you crossed the line.
You may not like Melania, but she rarely responds to incidents like these on Twitter.


Melania Trump
@FLOTUS
A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it.

I don’t care. Do you?

I guess it’s good that she cares bout her own kid....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When Melania goes to Twitter and posts a message like this, you know you crossed the line.
You may not like Melania, but she rarely responds to incidents like these on Twitter.


Melania Trump
@FLOTUS
A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it.

We don't need a former nude model to tell us a line was crossed. Everyone in America knows it was a stupid thing for Karlan to say.

Oh BS. It was a perfect thing for her to say.

The pun was forced and unnecessary but outrage is a bit much. FLOTUS twitter feed got hit up - "hey imagine how if feels to have your kids taken from you, locked in cages and forgotten."

DP. It wasn't a perfect thing for her to say. Addressing it and calling Karlan out, sure. But the rest? "Very angry and obviously biased public pandering"? Jeez, Melania. Not perfect. But she really doesn't care...

I'm sorry you didn't have a Mama Bear. Melania is a Mama Bear.

It was a dumb way for her to attempt to protect her child. Not a surprise though.

I will eat my hat if Melanie wrote that tweet. You think she wrote the fundraising appeal, too, I imagine? Or is the Trump campaign also a Mama Bear?

You people are effin hysterical, and I mean that in both senses of the word.

Attacking a child for a cheap zing is pathetic. Her choice as a witness was a waste of time. She'd be great for public access t.v.

It was a stupid pun, and in no way an “attack” on the child. You guys are completely mischaracterizing a dumb offhand comment and it’s so ridiculous. It’s reminding me of Huckabee Sanders and the smoky eye brouhaha. You should see what your President says about people sometime.

[Anonymous]

Just dawned on me--Trump publicly said no quid pro quo, therefore no quid pro quo. Trump publicly asked Wikileaks for Hillary emails, therefore he was in fact seeking assistance from Wikileaks. He's an honest president!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

Yeah but she also called the testimony "biased pandering" which is inaccurate at best and so makes her whole post look political and not a heartfelt defense of her child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

So, you would just like it ignored?

Karlan was way out of line on this. And, her apology was pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

The person who brought it up in her testimony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

So, you would just like it ignored?

Karlan was way out of line on this. And, her apology was pathetic.

Better than any apology Trump has ever given. Oh wait...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

So, you would just like it ignored?

Karlan was way out of line on this. And, her apology was pathetic.

The Barron line was dumb, unnecessary and strategically stupid, but there was nothing wrung with her apology, you’re just not used to seeing those.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When Melania goes to Twitter and posts a message like this, you know you crossed the line.
You may not like Melania, but she rarely responds to incidents like these on Twitter.


Melania Trump
@FLOTUS
A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it.

We don't need a former nude model to tell us a line was crossed. Everyone in America knows it was a stupid thing for Karlan to say.

I am amazed how prude Liberals are. Naked women body is fine. It is just a body, it is very natural. Apparently not everyone in America knows: Karlan has phd and she didn't know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

So, you would just like it ignored?

Karlan was way out of line on this. And, her apology was pathetic.

The pun was a reach - not out of line - but I think her apology was sincere. Trump has never apologized for anything he said or done

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

Thanks to her I learned her son was drawn into politics today! She has done her motherly duty by spreading this far and wide! So much for privacy, especially with the campaign and the Trump Administration News Network (aka FOX) running with it. They're all making sure Barron is in the spotlight and trending on Twitter!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

So, you would just like it ignored?

Karlan was way out of line on this. And, her apology was pathetic.

Better than any apology Trump has ever given. Oh wait...

It was an apology begrudgingly given after receiving a bunch of negative publicity, coupled with a "whatabout" disclaimer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how was Barron "attacked?"

He wasn't. He actually cannot be made a baron in the U.S., so it was a simple statement of fact. Why are Republicans so upset that he can't be made a baron?

Melania did not say Baron was "attacked". She said that a minor child should be kept out of politics. She is correct.

And who exactly politicized it? The people who first tweeted about it or the people fundraising off of it?

So, you would just like it ignored?

Karlan was way out of line on this. And, her apology was pathetic.

Yep, Karlan was wrong. But until Trump does this kind of thing all day every day x1000. It is really hard to be concerned because Trump has normalized brutal insults. Remember when he made fun of a physically disabled reporter? Remember when he called Democrats "human scum", "savages"? Thanks to Trump, this is now considered normal public discourse. So forgive me if I don't stop the presses for Karlan's mention of Trump's son.