CORONAVIRUS/COVID-19 NEW MEGA THREAD

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Global cases now exceed half a million.

As it stands now:

Cases 506,867

Deaths 22,990

And increasingly likely far, far more are infected without even having any symptoms. Which is either good or bad depending on your perspective.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

very few took it seriously at that time.

::::::::::::::::::

Um, if you go back and read the first Corona master thread, the dcurbanmoms were predicting a china style pandemic very, very early. Not sure why a bunch of randoms were able to predict it but our govt was unable.

Lots of us here are a) well-educated and b) have experience with epidemics abroad. We watch the news carefully.

I am a fat, lazy stay at home mom with an expired passport. I bought masks and supplies in mid-January. Its not rocket science.

I saw you at Costco with your cart full of frozen meatballs and toilet paper

[Anonymous]

Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases
- January 24: 1,000 cases
- January 31: 10,000 cases
- February 12: 50,000 cases
- March 6: 100,000 cases
- March 18: 200,000 cases
- March 21: 300,000 cases
- March 24: 400,000 cases
- March 26: 500,000 cases

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases
- January 24: 1,000 cases
- January 31: 10,000 cases
- February 12: 50,000 cases
- March 6: 100,000 cases
- March 18: 200,000 cases
- March 21: 300,000 cases
- March 24: 400,000 cases
- March 26: 500,000 cases

Let me fix this for you:
Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases = .000000014287 percent of world population
- January 24: 1,000 cases = .0000001428 percent of world population
- January 31: 10,000 cases = .000001428 percent of world population
- February 12: 50,000 cases = .000007142 percent of world population
- March 6: 100,000 cases = .00001428 percent of world population
- March 18: 200,000 cases = .00002857 percent of world population
- March 21: 300,000 cases = .000042857 percent of world population
- March 24: 400,000 cases = .000005714 percent of world population
- March 26: 500,000 cases = .00007142 percent of world population

TODAY: 3M+ Americans unemployed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

very few took it seriously at that time.

::::::::::::::::::

Um, if you go back and read the first Corona master thread, the dcurbanmoms were predicting a china style pandemic very, very early. Not sure why a bunch of randoms were able to predict it but our govt was unable.

Lots of us here are a) well-educated and b) have experience with epidemics abroad. We watch the news carefully.

I am a fat, lazy stay at home mom with an expired passport. I bought masks and supplies in mid-January. Its not rocket science.

I was quizzing a doctor about the number of ventilators at his hospital in January. I was trying to hunt down masks and they were already almost gone by then. The greed in this country has never really cared about health care. Over the years government policy cutting costs has had a direct result in deaths. This mess is not shocking at all sadly. Greed does not make the US a top country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases
- January 24: 1,000 cases
- January 31: 10,000 cases
- February 12: 50,000 cases
- March 6: 100,000 cases
- March 18: 200,000 cases
- March 21: 300,000 cases
- March 24: 400,000 cases
- March 26: 500,000 cases

Let me fix this for you:
Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases = .000000014287 percent of world population
- January 24: 1,000 cases = .0000001428 percent of world population
- January 31: 10,000 cases = .000001428 percent of world population
- February 12: 50,000 cases = .000007142 percent of world population
- March 6: 100,000 cases = .00001428 percent of world population
- March 18: 200,000 cases = .00002857 percent of world population
- March 21: 300,000 cases = .000042857 percent of world population
- March 24: 400,000 cases = .000005714 percent of world population
- March 26: 500,000 cases = .00007142 percent of world population

TODAY: 3M+ Americans unemployed

Geez

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases
- January 24: 1,000 cases
- January 31: 10,000 cases
- February 12: 50,000 cases
- March 6: 100,000 cases
- March 18: 200,000 cases
- March 21: 300,000 cases
- March 24: 400,000 cases
- March 26: 500,000 cases

Let me fix this for you:
Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases = .000000014287 percent of world population
- January 24: 1,000 cases = .0000001428 percent of world population
- January 31: 10,000 cases = .000001428 percent of world population
- February 12: 50,000 cases = .000007142 percent of world population
- March 6: 100,000 cases = .00001428 percent of world population
- March 18: 200,000 cases = .00002857 percent of world population
- March 21: 300,000 cases = .000042857 percent of world population
- March 24: 400,000 cases = .000005714 percent of world population
- March 26: 500,000 cases = .00007142 percent of world population

TODAY: 3M+ Americans unemployed

I think the point is that were it not for the shutdowns, the number of cases would be very much higher. It is clearly very infectious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases
- January 24: 1,000 cases
- January 31: 10,000 cases
- February 12: 50,000 cases
- March 6: 100,000 cases
- March 18: 200,000 cases
- March 21: 300,000 cases
- March 24: 400,000 cases
- March 26: 500,000 cases

Let me fix this for you:
Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases = .000000014287 percent of world population
- January 24: 1,000 cases = .0000001428 percent of world population
- January 31: 10,000 cases = .000001428 percent of world population
- February 12: 50,000 cases = .000007142 percent of world population
- March 6: 100,000 cases = .00001428 percent of world population
- March 18: 200,000 cases = .00002857 percent of world population
- March 21: 300,000 cases = .000042857 percent of world population
- March 24: 400,000 cases = .000005714 percent of world population
- March 26: 500,000 cases = .00007142 percent of world population

TODAY: 3M+ Americans unemployed

I think the point is that were it not for the shutdowns, the number of cases would be very much higher. It is clearly very infectious.

We don't know that for sure. Maybe millions of us are already infected as some epidemiologists suspect, with increasing evidence the majority never feel any symptoms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases
- January 24: 1,000 cases
- January 31: 10,000 cases
- February 12: 50,000 cases
- March 6: 100,000 cases
- March 18: 200,000 cases
- March 21: 300,000 cases
- March 24: 400,000 cases
- March 26: 500,000 cases

Let me fix this for you:
Coronavirus timeline:
- January 19: 100 cases = .000000014287 percent of world population
- January 24: 1,000 cases = .0000001428 percent of world population
- January 31: 10,000 cases = .000001428 percent of world population
- February 12: 50,000 cases = .000007142 percent of world population
- March 6: 100,000 cases = .00001428 percent of world population
- March 18: 200,000 cases = .00002857 percent of world population
- March 21: 300,000 cases = .000042857 percent of world population
- March 24: 400,000 cases = .000005714 percent of world population
- March 26: 500,000 cases = .00007142 percent of world population

TODAY: 3M+ Americans unemployed

I think the point is that were it not for the shutdowns, the number of cases would be very much higher. It is clearly very infectious.

We don't know that for sure. Maybe millions of us are already infected as some epidemiologists suspect, with increasing evidence the majority never feel any symptoms.

I guarantee that the 3M+ Americans noted above will be feeling symptoms.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

very few took it seriously at that time.

::::::::::::::::::

Um, if you go back and read the first Corona master thread, the dcurbanmoms were predicting a china style pandemic very, very early. Not sure why a bunch of randoms were able to predict it but our govt was unable.

Lots of us here are a) well-educated and b) have experience with epidemics abroad. We watch the news carefully.

Point is, shouldn't our government ALSO be well educated and watching the news carefully?

Unfortunately, that’s now how the electoral college worked.

[Anonymous]

The Imperial College model has been revised based on new information to provide a downgraded estimate of infections in the UK:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/epidemiologist-behind-highly-cited-coronavirus-model-admits-he-was-wrong-drastically-revises-model

https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1243133211011690499

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Imperial College model has been revised based on new information to provide a downgraded estimate of infections in the UK:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/epidemiologist-behind-highly-cited-coronavirus-model-admits-he-was-wrong-drastically-revises-model

https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1243133211011690499

Revised based on changes the UK made to address the spread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

very few took it seriously at that time.

::::::::::::::::::

Um, if you go back and read the first Corona master thread, the dcurbanmoms were predicting a china style pandemic very, very early. Not sure why a bunch of randoms were able to predict it but our govt was unable.

Lots of us here are a) well-educated and b) have experience with epidemics abroad. We watch the news carefully.

I am a fat, lazy stay at home mom with an expired passport. I bought masks and supplies in mid-January. Its not rocket science.

I saw you at Costco with your cart full of frozen meatballs and toilet paper

No complaint if she did it in January or February.

[Anonymous]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-us-now-leads-the-world-in-confirmed-coronavirus-cases/ar-BB11LlDh?li=BBnb7Kz US leads the world in confirmed cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Imperial College model has been revised based on new information to provide a downgraded estimate of infections in the UK:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/epidemiologist-behind-highly-cited-coronavirus-model-admits-he-was-wrong-drastically-revises-model

https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1243133211011690499

Hmm, convenient they change their tune after Birx called them out. Imperial college study/model lost a LOT of credit this week