Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I hope AH wins, but I am also worried about something one of the commentators said, that the jurors smiled at Vasquez at the beginning of the day today, and didn't show any other particular reaction to any of the other attys.

Camille Vasquez forces the judge, Depp's witnesses, Depp himself, and the jurors to smile at her. Don't be fooled. In between looking like she was going to puke during Rottenborn's closing statement, she managed to keep looking at jurors to gauge their thoughts. Eventually they saw or felt her looking at them and she forces eye contact, fake smiles, and waits for them to smile back. Wonder if Curry who isn't a board certified psychiatrist can diagnose Camille Vasquez's affliction.

The only reason she’s on this trial team is because everyone else knew that she, as an attractive woman, could get away with saying things her male colleagues never could. From their mouths, it would be immediately recognizable for the misogynistic, abuse-promoting bullshit it is.

Plus one

Maybe if by
She's only 38 years old and will bank millions of dollars this year after attending a third tier law school. On what planet do you nitwits think this woman is a loser? She's about to be richer than 99% of 38-40 year old Ivy League lawyers.

That was not the bone of contention - it was that she was selected for superficial optics rather than legal talent.

+1. Her courtroom performance was average. Maybe she will improve with a few more trials under her belt, but if it were for her physical appearance no one would have been particularly impressed by her.

I agree with all of this. I only saw the viral clips of her, but she reminded me of my high school mock trial team. Was bewildering that people were calling her “savage”

Are either of you trial attorneys? Her courtroom performance was better than average. Her objections were accurate. Her questions on direct were not leading. She knew the evidence well -- not easy to do when there are thousands of exhibits -- and she thought quickly on her feet. All of this really is not easy to put together.

Are you talking about Cv? Maybe savage if you define savage as aggressive and uncultured. She was nasty and unnecessarily hostile. If she was more sophisticated she would have understood she was making it look like a high school parking lot fight on cross . i thought Amber Heard handled it fairly well.

May I also say, for the reputation Johnny Depp has, there was too much “interpersonal” play between him and CV in the courtroom. That was for show and it was also gross on his part. If I was CV I would not have allowed that. Between the doodling and the snacks and the costume and the texts and the disrespect to Rottenborn, he looked like a posterBoy for a case of 58 year old arrested development. Heard’s team should have included a brain mri of him into evidence.

CV allowed it because that was the whole reason she got to be part of the trial team. She’s an opportunist. Integrity seemingly is not her thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I hope AH wins, but I am also worried about something one of the commentators said, that the jurors smiled at Vasquez at the beginning of the day today, and didn't show any other particular reaction to any of the other attys.

Camille Vasquez forces the judge, Depp's witnesses, Depp himself, and the jurors to smile at her. Don't be fooled. In between looking like she was going to puke during Rottenborn's closing statement, she managed to keep looking at jurors to gauge their thoughts. Eventually they saw or felt her looking at them and she forces eye contact, fake smiles, and waits for them to smile back. Wonder if Curry who isn't a board certified psychiatrist can diagnose Camille Vasquez's affliction.

The only reason she’s on this trial team is because everyone else knew that she, as an attractive woman, could get away with saying things her male colleagues never could. From their mouths, it would be immediately recognizable for the misogynistic, abuse-promoting bullshit it is.

Plus one

Maybe if by
She's only 38 years old and will bank millions of dollars this year after attending a third tier law school. On what planet do you nitwits think this woman is a loser? She's about to be richer than 99% of 38-40 year old Ivy League lawyers.

That was not the bone of contention - it was that she was selected for superficial optics rather than legal talent.

+1. Her courtroom performance was average. Maybe she will improve with a few more trials under her belt, but if it were for her physical appearance no one would have been particularly impressed by her.

I agree with all of this. I only saw the viral clips of her, but she reminded me of my high school mock trial team. Was bewildering that people were calling her “savage”

Are either of you trial attorneys? Her courtroom performance was better than average. Her objections were accurate. Her questions on direct were not leading. She knew the evidence well -- not easy to do when there are thousands of exhibits -- and she thought quickly on her feet. All of this really is not easy to put together.

Are you talking about Cv? Maybe savage if you define savage as aggressive and uncultured. She was nasty and unnecessarily hostile. If she was more sophisticated she would have understood she was making it look like a high school parking lot fight on cross . i thought Amber Heard handled it fairly well.

May I also say, for the reputation Johnny Depp has, there was too much “interpersonal” play between him and CV in the courtroom. That was for show and it was also gross on his part. If I was CV I would not have allowed that. Between the doodling and the snacks and the costume and the texts and the disrespect to Rottenborn, he looked like a posterBoy for a case of 58 year old arrested development. Heard’s team should have included a brain mri of him into evidence.

Spare us your misogynist drivel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I hope AH wins, but I am also worried about something one of the commentators said, that the jurors smiled at Vasquez at the beginning of the day today, and didn't show any other particular reaction to any of the other attys.

Camille Vasquez forces the judge, Depp's witnesses, Depp himself, and the jurors to smile at her. Don't be fooled. In between looking like she was going to puke during Rottenborn's closing statement, she managed to keep looking at jurors to gauge their thoughts. Eventually they saw or felt her looking at them and she forces eye contact, fake smiles, and waits for them to smile back. Wonder if Curry who isn't a board certified psychiatrist can diagnose Camille Vasquez's affliction.

The only reason she’s on this trial team is because everyone else knew that she, as an attractive woman, could get away with saying things her male colleagues never could. From their mouths, it would be immediately recognizable for the misogynistic, abuse-promoting bullshit it is.

Plus one

Maybe if by
She's only 38 years old and will bank millions of dollars this year after attending a third tier law school. On what planet do you nitwits think this woman is a loser? She's about to be richer than 99% of 38-40 year old Ivy League lawyers.

That was not the bone of contention - it was that she was selected for superficial optics rather than legal talent.

+1. Her courtroom performance was average. Maybe she will improve with a few more trials under her belt, but if it were for her physical appearance no one would have been particularly impressed by her.

I agree with all of this. I only saw the viral clips of her, but she reminded me of my high school mock trial team. Was bewildering that people were calling her “savage”

Are either of you trial attorneys? Her courtroom performance was better than average. Her objections were accurate. Her questions on direct were not leading. She knew the evidence well -- not easy to do when there are thousands of exhibits -- and she thought quickly on her feet. All of this really is not easy to put together.

Are you talking about Cv? Maybe savage if you define savage as aggressive and uncultured. She was nasty and unnecessarily hostile. If she was more sophisticated she would have understood she was making it look like a high school parking lot fight on cross . i thought Amber Heard handled it fairly well.

May I also say, for the reputation Johnny Depp has, there was too much “interpersonal” play between him and CV in the courtroom. That was for show and it was also gross on his part. If I was CV I would not have allowed that. Between the doodling and the snacks and the costume and the texts and the disrespect to Rottenborn, he looked like a posterBoy for a case of 58 year old arrested development. Heard’s team should have included a brain mri of him into evidence.

Spare us your misogynist drivel.

+1. All I see is attorneys being close to their client and believing in him. Amber and her team only acted close after seeing JD's side. The fake hugs and show of support only appeared toward the end of the trial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s really sick that Depp fans have been threatening Heard’s child.

Er no, lunatics have been making threads to each of them, separately, because they're easy targets.

Kid should be off limits. No one should ever be posting a suggestion anywhere of putting someone’s baby in a microwave. Why are you trying to excuse this?

No I agree with you kids should be off limits, and all lunatics should go away forever. I was saying was that it was lunatics, not just "JD fans" making those awful threats, because lunatics & JD fans - they are not always one and the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s really sick that Depp fans have been threatening Heard’s child.

Er no, lunatics have been making threads to each of them, separately, because they're easy targets.

Kid should be off limits. No one should ever be posting a suggestion anywhere of putting someone’s baby in a microwave. Why are you trying to excuse this?

No I agree with you kids should be off limits, and all lunatics should go away forever. I was saying was that it was lunatics, not just "JD fans" making those awful threats, because lunatics & JD fans - they are not always one and the same.

+1 and JD certainly has nothing to do with it, so you calling those lunatics JD fans insinuate that he played a role in it.

[Anonymous]

Ugh I feel so bad for both of their kids. Having a parent in this kind of trial, never mind vitriolic fans on both sides, sounds awful. Good thing they’re parents can afford therapy I guess?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I hope AH wins, but I am also worried about something one of the commentators said, that the jurors smiled at Vasquez at the beginning of the day today, and didn't show any other particular reaction to any of the other attys.

Camille Vasquez forces the judge, Depp's witnesses, Depp himself, and the jurors to smile at her. Don't be fooled. In between looking like she was going to puke during Rottenborn's closing statement, she managed to keep looking at jurors to gauge their thoughts. Eventually they saw or felt her looking at them and she forces eye contact, fake smiles, and waits for them to smile back. Wonder if Curry who isn't a board certified psychiatrist can diagnose Camille Vasquez's affliction.

The only reason she’s on this trial team is because everyone else knew that she, as an attractive woman, could get away with saying things her male colleagues never could. From their mouths, it would be immediately recognizable for the misogynistic, abuse-promoting bullshit it is.

Plus one

Maybe if by
She's only 38 years old and will bank millions of dollars this year after attending a third tier law school. On what planet do you nitwits think this woman is a loser? She's about to be richer than 99% of 38-40 year old Ivy League lawyers.

That was not the bone of contention - it was that she was selected for superficial optics rather than legal talent.

+1. Her courtroom performance was average. Maybe she will improve with a few more trials under her belt, but if it were for her physical appearance no one would have been particularly impressed by her.

I agree with all of this. I only saw the viral clips of her, but she reminded me of my high school mock trial team. Was bewildering that people were calling her “savage”

Are either of you trial attorneys? Her courtroom performance was better than average. Her objections were accurate. Her questions on direct were not leading. She knew the evidence well -- not easy to do when there are thousands of exhibits -- and she thought quickly on her feet. All of this really is not easy to put together.

Are you talking about Cv? Maybe savage if you define savage as aggressive and uncultured. She was nasty and unnecessarily hostile. If she was more sophisticated she would have understood she was making it look like a high school parking lot fight on cross . i thought Amber Heard handled it fairly well.

May I also say, for the reputation Johnny Depp has, there was too much “interpersonal” play between him and CV in the courtroom. That was for show and it was also gross on his part. If I was CV I would not have allowed that. Between the doodling and the snacks and the costume and the texts and the disrespect to Rottenborn, he looked like a posterBoy for a case of 58 year old arrested development. Heard’s team should have included a brain mri of him into evidence.

Spare us your misogynist drivel.

+1. All I see is attorneys being close to their client and believing in him. Amber and her team only acted close after seeing JD's side. The fake hugs and show of support only appeared toward the end of the trial.

Exactly! So lame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I hope AH wins, but I am also worried about something one of the commentators said, that the jurors smiled at Vasquez at the beginning of the day today, and didn't show any other particular reaction to any of the other attys.

Camille Vasquez forces the judge, Depp's witnesses, Depp himself, and the jurors to smile at her. Don't be fooled. In between looking like she was going to puke during Rottenborn's closing statement, she managed to keep looking at jurors to gauge their thoughts. Eventually they saw or felt her looking at them and she forces eye contact, fake smiles, and waits for them to smile back. Wonder if Curry who isn't a board certified psychiatrist can diagnose Camille Vasquez's affliction.

The only reason she’s on this trial team is because everyone else knew that she, as an attractive woman, could get away with saying things her male colleagues never could. From their mouths, it would be immediately recognizable for the misogynistic, abuse-promoting bullshit it is.

Plus one

Maybe if by
She's only 38 years old and will bank millions of dollars this year after attending a third tier law school. On what planet do you nitwits think this woman is a loser? She's about to be richer than 99% of 38-40 year old Ivy League lawyers.

That was not the bone of contention - it was that she was selected for superficial optics rather than legal talent.

+1. Her courtroom performance was average. Maybe she will improve with a few more trials under her belt, but if it were for her physical appearance no one would have been particularly impressed by her.

I agree with all of this. I only saw the viral clips of her, but she reminded me of my high school mock trial team. Was bewildering that people were calling her “savage”

Are either of you trial attorneys? Her courtroom performance was better than average. Her objections were accurate. Her questions on direct were not leading. She knew the evidence well -- not easy to do when there are thousands of exhibits -- and she thought quickly on her feet. All of this really is not easy to put together.

Are you talking about Cv? Maybe savage if you define savage as aggressive and uncultured. She was nasty and unnecessarily hostile. If she was more sophisticated she would have understood she was making it look like a high school parking lot fight on cross . i thought Amber Heard handled it fairly well.

May I also say, for the reputation Johnny Depp has, there was too much “interpersonal” play between him and CV in the courtroom. That was for show and it was also gross on his part. If I was CV I would not have allowed that. Between the doodling and the snacks and the costume and the texts and the disrespect to Rottenborn, he looked like a posterBoy for a case of 58 year old arrested development. Heard’s team should have included a brain mri of him into evidence.

Spare us your misogynist drivel.

What part of this is misogynistic? I am evaluating her with the same criteria as the male lawyers in this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I hope AH wins, but I am also worried about something one of the commentators said, that the jurors smiled at Vasquez at the beginning of the day today, and didn't show any other particular reaction to any of the other attys.

Camille Vasquez forces the judge, Depp's witnesses, Depp himself, and the jurors to smile at her. Don't be fooled. In between looking like she was going to puke during Rottenborn's closing statement, she managed to keep looking at jurors to gauge their thoughts. Eventually they saw or felt her looking at them and she forces eye contact, fake smiles, and waits for them to smile back. Wonder if Curry who isn't a board certified psychiatrist can diagnose Camille Vasquez's affliction.

The only reason she’s on this trial team is because everyone else knew that she, as an attractive woman, could get away with saying things her male colleagues never could. From their mouths, it would be immediately recognizable for the misogynistic, abuse-promoting bullshit it is.

Plus one

Maybe if by
She's only 38 years old and will bank millions of dollars this year after attending a third tier law school. On what planet do you nitwits think this woman is a loser? She's about to be richer than 99% of 38-40 year old Ivy League lawyers.

That was not the bone of contention - it was that she was selected for superficial optics rather than legal talent.

+1. Her courtroom performance was average. Maybe she will improve with a few more trials under her belt, but if it were for her physical appearance no one would have been particularly impressed by her.

I agree with all of this. I only saw the viral clips of her, but she reminded me of my high school mock trial team. Was bewildering that people were calling her “savage”

Are either of you trial attorneys? Her courtroom performance was better than average. Her objections were accurate. Her questions on direct were not leading. She knew the evidence well -- not easy to do when there are thousands of exhibits -- and she thought quickly on her feet. All of this really is not easy to put together.

Are you talking about Cv? Maybe savage if you define savage as aggressive and uncultured. She was nasty and unnecessarily hostile. If she was more sophisticated she would have understood she was making it look like a high school parking lot fight on cross . i thought Amber Heard handled it fairly well.

May I also say, for the reputation Johnny Depp has, there was too much “interpersonal” play between him and CV in the courtroom. That was for show and it was also gross on his part. If I was CV I would not have allowed that. Between the doodling and the snacks and the costume and the texts and the disrespect to Rottenborn, he looked like a posterBoy for a case of 58 year old arrested development. Heard’s team should have included a brain mri of him into evidence.

Spare us your misogynist drivel.

+1. All I see is attorneys being close to their client and believing in him. Amber and her team only acted close after seeing JD's side. The fake hugs and show of support only appeared toward the end of the trial.

DP. Attorneys should not have personal relationships with their clients. It’s unethical.

[Anonymous]

I read somewhere that jD wanted an older more experienced more famous female trial lawyer that he saw on TV. Ben Chew or someone on the team prevented her from joining the team because she came too late to the game to know all the facts of the case. Therefore they picked CV from the firm. Who knows what if any of this is true.

[Anonymous]

Why did JD marry AH if he knew her personality for years before they got married? And moreover did not have a prenup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did JD marry AH if he knew her personality for years before they got married? And moreover did not have a prenup.

Good question. One might almost think he’s lying through his capped teeth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did JD marry AH if he knew her personality for years before they got married? And moreover did not have a prenup.

Why did AH marry JD if she knew what a alcoholic drug addict he was?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I hope AH wins, but I am also worried about something one of the commentators said, that the jurors smiled at Vasquez at the beginning of the day today, and didn't show any other particular reaction to any of the other attys.

Camille Vasquez forces the judge, Depp's witnesses, Depp himself, and the jurors to smile at her. Don't be fooled. In between looking like she was going to puke during Rottenborn's closing statement, she managed to keep looking at jurors to gauge their thoughts. Eventually they saw or felt her looking at them and she forces eye contact, fake smiles, and waits for them to smile back. Wonder if Curry who isn't a board certified psychiatrist can diagnose Camille Vasquez's affliction.

The only reason she’s on this trial team is because everyone else knew that she, as an attractive woman, could get away with saying things her male colleagues never could. From their mouths, it would be immediately recognizable for the misogynistic, abuse-promoting bullshit it is.

Plus one

Maybe if by
She's only 38 years old and will bank millions of dollars this year after attending a third tier law school. On what planet do you nitwits think this woman is a loser? She's about to be richer than 99% of 38-40 year old Ivy League lawyers.

That was not the bone of contention - it was that she was selected for superficial optics rather than legal talent.

+1. Her courtroom performance was average. Maybe she will improve with a few more trials under her belt, but if it were for her physical appearance no one would have been particularly impressed by her.

I agree with all of this. I only saw the viral clips of her, but she reminded me of my high school mock trial team. Was bewildering that people were calling her “savage”

Are either of you trial attorneys? Her courtroom performance was better than average. Her objections were accurate. Her questions on direct were not leading. She knew the evidence well -- not easy to do when there are thousands of exhibits -- and she thought quickly on her feet. All of this really is not easy to put together.

Are you talking about Cv? Maybe savage if you define savage as aggressive and uncultured. She was nasty and unnecessarily hostile. If she was more sophisticated she would have understood she was making it look like a high school parking lot fight on cross . i thought Amber Heard handled it fairly well.

May I also say, for the reputation Johnny Depp has, there was too much “interpersonal” play between him and CV in the courtroom. That was for show and it was also gross on his part. If I was CV I would not have allowed that. Between the doodling and the snacks and the costume and the texts and the disrespect to Rottenborn, he looked like a posterBoy for a case of 58 year old arrested development. Heard’s team should have included a brain mri of him into evidence.

Spare us your misogynist drivel.

+1. All I see is attorneys being close to their client and believing in him. Amber and her team only acted close after seeing JD's side. The fake hugs and show of support only appeared toward the end of the trial.

DP. Attorneys should not have personal relationships with their clients. It’s unethical.

I just don't see a personal relationship. The public likes to ship 2 persons and makes up things out of nothing. I didn't see anything inappropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did JD marry AH if he knew her personality for years before they got married? And moreover did not have a prenup.

I think the expression is “thinking with your d*** instead of your brain”.