Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"However, as my client has already made clear, she does not know Judge Kavanaugh and has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford," the letter from Howard Walsh, Keyser's attorney, said. It continued that Keyser "does not refute Dr. Ford's account, and she has already told the press that she believes Dr. Ford's account."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/christine-blasey-ford-friend-leland-keyser-clarifies-statement-about-alleged-assault-by-brett-kavanaugh/


Cliffs of insanity party of millions...

Not a single Ford supporter will explain this.

It’s been explained so many times but I’ll do it again: that gathering was a non-event for Keyser so nobody expects her to remember. They went to the pool almost every day, it sounds like small gatherings after being at the pool were a regular occurrence, and Ford didn’t tell her about the assault. Can you recall every gathering big or small that you went to as a freshman in college and who was there? I certainly cannot, I pretty much just remember events, etc. with personal significance, even then I can’t remember much detail. Even though she doesn’t remember anything she trusts her friend and believes her.

And, I will say it again.... Her own friend has said she does not know Kavanaugh. How do you reconcile this..... Ford said after her alleged assault, she went downstairs, left the house where her friend was and the three boys were downstairs with her. How could this be if her friend says she doesn’t know Kavanaugh?

Easy. I hung out with many people over the years briefly and I have no recollection of them today.

Let’s consider the situation. 4 boys. 2 girls. One girl claims she was sexually assaulted while 2 boys and another girls were downstairs. The two boys who allegedly assaulted her go downstairs and join the other 2 boys and 1 girl. That is 4 boys and 1 girl downstairs.
Ford claims she left at that point. Seemingly, leaving her friend with these other 4 boys. Several questions come to mind....
1. Evidently, Ford was not at all considered about the safety of her friend with the 4 boys, despite the fact that she was allegedly assaulted. You don’t find that strange? You don’t find it odd that she never asked her friend what happened after she left?
2. Leland was allegedly in the room with 4 boys, one of which was allegedly Kavanaugh, yet she claims not to know him. Seriously? A small gathering such as this and she still claims she doesn’t know him?
3. Ford leaves, not knowing how she got home. Does her friend not wonder why she left? Wouldn’t a friend follow up and ask her about it?

It makes no sense......

I agree. Also, she is sure she drank only one beer. What does she remember of this? Where did she drink it? Was she talking with the orhers? How can she remember the number of beers but nithing else about what was going on while she drank it?

If we look at her yearbook, you'll see how none of those party girls had only one beer.

They also are not alleged to have assaulted anyone.

See the difference?

No, but she is accusing him of assault. With all the drinking depicted in her yearbooks, how do we know SHE was not drunk? Because she said she wasn’t? Maybe that is why she doesn’t remember how she got home.

She clearly remembers only one beer. We are to take her word.

Why?

Crickets

I would imagine after she was assaulted one of the thoughts that ran through her mind over and over was, how did this happen to me? Part of that was probably I just had one beer. Was it my fault? I only had one beer. Should I tell my parents? I had a beer, my parents would kill me. So many reasons she would remember this detail.

Kavanaugh on the hand says he only drank on the weekends. His own freaking calendar shows him going to parties on weekdays too! But sure, let's believe him.

For goodness sake--it was summer. And July 1st was Thursday before a three day weekend.

Please, he would say anything - we have seen that - truth is not important or necessary in his view. Keep defending him. Maybe you could work for Kelly Ann. She is the master of the spin.

[Anonymous]

I agree with folks who say he will be confirmed. This is why Trump has pushed back his meeting with Rosenstein, he need Kavanaugh on the court before he does it. Kavanaugh will always been seen as an illegitimate SCJ.

[Anonymous]

I agree he will be confirmed by the skin of his nose. However, I also predict he will be impeached for perjury and other high crimes and misdeameanors within three years. I can assure you that Ronan Farrow and other investigative journalists will not let this drop.

If he is smart, he will withdraw, keep his present judgeship and pray reporters will forget about him.

[Anonymous]

The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The away will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

If that is true he will always be illegitimate and this will hang over him forever, SCOTUS or not. Stupid move but he and Trump only care about getting him on the court.

Sacrifice will not be worth it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

If that is true he will always be illegitimate and this will hang over him forever, SCOTUS or not. Stupid move but he and Trump only care about getting him on the court.

Sacrifice will not be worth it.

Only in the minds of liberals who had him guilty before anyone testified about any of this crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree he will be confirmed by the skin of his nose. However, I also predict he will be impeached for perjury and other high crimes and misdeameanors within three years. I can assure you that Ronan Farrow and other investigative journalists will not let this drop.

If he is smart, he will withdraw, keep his present judgeship and pray reporters will forget about him.

Good luck with this.
Ronan Farrow has lost a lot of credibility with his last story. He can search all he wants. He will find nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

If that is true he will always be illegitimate and this will hang over him forever, SCOTUS or not. Stupid move but he and Trump only care about getting him on the court.

Sacrifice will not be worth it.

Only in the minds of liberals who had him guilty before anyone testified about any of this crap.

Anyone on the fence is no longer on the fence. He looked like an angry drunk, and he was presumably sober. He had a pathetic tantrum. The GOP is going to lose people who may have gone their way in the past.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree he will be confirmed by the skin of his nose. However, I also predict he will be impeached for perjury and other high crimes and misdeameanors within three years. I can assure you that Ronan Farrow and other investigative journalists will not let this drop.

If he is smart, he will withdraw, keep his present judgeship and pray reporters will forget about him.

Good luck with this.
Ronan Farrow has lost a lot of credibility with his last story. He can search all he wants. He will find nothing.

No Supreme Court justice has been impeached and removed. There's always a first time. And I think the GOP is seriously miscalculating. Or just not thinking at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

If that is true he will always be illegitimate and this will hang over him forever, SCOTUS or not. Stupid move but he and Trump only care about getting him on the court.

Sacrifice will not be worth it.

Once he's on the court it won't matter. Clarence Thomas is still sitting pretty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

Exactly! And the point was made repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings when Democrats were wanting the FBI to investigate. It is merely a background investigation specifically focused on the allegations about sexual assault. It was never meant to be a criminal investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is all so ridiculous. They should just pull his nomination. What a waste of our time and resources. Anybody hear of a horrible tsunami in Indonesia?? 800 + people dead.

There are so many well-qualified conservative republican judges they could substitute!!

But, they don't think they could get it done in a lame-duck session, so they've put all their money on Brett.

Not a good wager, but McConnell has pulled off similar schemes in the past, so it may happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

https://www.newsweek.com/kavanaugh-said-he-had-no-connections-yale-he-was-legacy-student-1145286
Kavanaugh lied about the Yale legacy, he liked about the drinking age. Those two are provable, so far.

The Yale legacy thing has been totally debunked. Question: Did he say anything in his testimony or in answering questions that he was not a legacy student?
The drinking age.... go back and read his testimony. He did not lie.

Kavanaugh said he had no connections.

The drinking age thing: definite lie.
http://time.com/5409564/brett-kavanaugh-drinking-age-maryland/

But I'm all for him being confirmed, just like you want. Then we'll see what happens. I've known guys like him, they'll find a way to implode one way or another, once they achieve their objective.

His inability to control himself and his entitlement and rage make him very similar to the psychopaths who participate in employee shootings or take their family hostage. He was scary.
He is one of those people where they have this veneer of civility but when something doesn't go their way they are frightening.

Are you taking DRAMA 101 this year?

No one was afraid of Clarence Thomas in his hearing. Kavanaugh screwed up. He let us all see the ugly inside. He is a frightening person. I wouldn't trust him with my dog, let alone being a judge. He should not be the judge in any case at all.

We've definitely seen the ugly, frightening sides of several people this week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

Link?