Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

Exactly! And the point was made repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings when Democrats were wanting the FBI to investigate. It is merely a background investigation specifically focused on the allegations about sexual assault. It was never meant to be a criminal investigation.

Please, they would have looked at his serious drinking and partying in college and high school. And he would have been done. Because the truth is that he could have done it and doesn't remember. THAT IS THE TRUTH. He is unfit.

They were chicken shit to have the investigation look in to that. That is why they denied, refused and ducked all calls to have a FBI investigation.

And seeing BK yesterday, ducking questions like a guilty person, that just underscores why they needed an investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And for those saying, she was drinking, she may not remember accurately so pooooooooooor brett, he says he is innocent, we should believe him.

No. She knew him. She had been dating his friend. She knew him, she knew it was him.

The insinuation that she put herself at risk therefore she shouldn't expect to be believed, or it was just attempted rape, therefore not that bad - that EXACTLY is why judges who rule that way are getting thrown off the bench.

That time in our history is over and those judges who rule that way are out.

Too bad for BK that he wasn't born decades before so he could have made it on the court.

It seems that in your world view only women are to be believed, and only men need to be accountable for their drinking and resulting behaviors. I sincerely hope that's not what you're thinking.

This was a job interview. She is a credible witness. There were doubts about his character and he confirmed those and raised new doubts in his tantrum. Bad strategy.
He is done.

Nope. He will be confirmed. My prediction is 53-47. It should be 100-0.

You are smoking something if you think he belongs on the supreme court. He couldn't pass a job interview to sweep the steps.

Hate him?

I don't know anyone who hires someone who yells and cries and is blatantly rude to the interviewer.
I cried in an interview once, and I did not get hired. It was working with underprivileged children and in describing some of the horrendous situations previous students had been in, I broke down and cried.
Of course I did not get hired.

I didn't yell, I didn't turn the questions back on the interviewer like 8 yr olds on the playground. He was awful. No one would hire him even though he went to Yale!

What you were witnessing was not a job interview. It has moved on from that.
It was a reaction to character assassination and an attempt at smearing a good man’s name.
Better analogy would be a “witness” who is being questioned by police, after having been accused of a heinous crime because some person had said it was him, even with no evidence. Because that is exactly what this is like. The Dems have tagged him as “guilty” despite a total lack of evidence and he was defending his name.

His reaction was NOT GOOD. He came off like that entitled drunk lady who was arrested for DUI and was going on and on about how she was a thoroughbred or some nonsense:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/US/woman-arrested-dui-pleads-police-im-clean-thoroughbred/story%3fid=57121825

BUT I WENT TO YALE!!!!!!!!!

You are right! She is a female BK

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

Exactly! And the point was made repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings when Democrats were wanting the FBI to investigate. It is merely a background investigation specifically focused on the allegations about sexual assault. It was never meant to be a criminal investigation.

Please, they would have looked at his serious drinking and partying in college and high school. And he would have been done. Because the truth is that he could have done it and doesn't remember. THAT IS THE TRUTH. He is unfit.

They were chicken shit to have the investigation look in to that. That is why they denied, refused and ducked all calls to have a FBI investigation.

And seeing BK yesterday, ducking questions like a guilty person, that just underscores why they needed an investigation.

And, they missed this during any one of the last 6 background investigations? You’re crazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

Exactly! And the point was made repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings when Democrats were wanting the FBI to investigate. It is merely a background investigation specifically focused on the allegations about sexual assault. It was never meant to be a criminal investigation.

Please, they would have looked at his serious drinking and partying in college and high school. And he would have been done. Because the truth is that he could have done it and doesn't remember. THAT IS THE TRUTH. He is unfit.

They were chicken shit to have the investigation look in to that. That is why they denied, refused and ducked all calls to have a FBI investigation.

And seeing BK yesterday, ducking questions like a guilty person, that just underscores why they needed an investigation.

This. Exactly this. No one can discern the truth from he-said-she-said. But there are MANY voices saying that he drank too much (and maybe still does), too many to be discredited. And he lied about that. He's not fit.

[Anonymous]

Avenatti’s new client has a checkered past with questionable claims. I really hope they charge her (and Avenatti) with making false allegations.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36503/kavanaugh-accuser-lied-about-background-has-ryan-saavedra

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

Exactly! And the point was made repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings when Democrats were wanting the FBI to investigate. It is merely a background investigation specifically focused on the allegations about sexual assault. It was never meant to be a criminal investigation.

Please, they would have looked at his serious drinking and partying in college and high school. And he would have been done. Because the truth is that he could have done it and doesn't remember. THAT IS THE TRUTH. He is unfit.

They were chicken shit to have the investigation look in to that. That is why they denied, refused and ducked all calls to have a FBI investigation.

And seeing BK yesterday, ducking questions like a guilty person, that just underscores why they needed an investigation.

This. Exactly this. No one can discern the truth from he-said-she-said. But there are MANY voices saying that he drank too much (and maybe still does), too many to be discredited. And he lied about that. He's not fit.

Didn't lie. Said sometimes I drank too much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

Exactly! And the point was made repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings when Democrats were wanting the FBI to investigate. It is merely a background investigation specifically focused on the allegations about sexual assault. It was never meant to be a criminal investigation.

Please, they would have looked at his serious drinking and partying in college and high school. And he would have been done. Because the truth is that he could have done it and doesn't remember. THAT IS THE TRUTH. He is unfit.

They were chicken shit to have the investigation look in to that. That is why they denied, refused and ducked all calls to have a FBI investigation.

And seeing BK yesterday, ducking questions like a guilty person, that just underscores why they needed an investigation.

This. Exactly this. No one can discern the truth from he-said-she-said. But there are MANY voices saying that he drank too much (and maybe still does), too many to be discredited. And he lied about that. He's not fit.

Sure. And, the 6 FBI background investigations caught none of that. But, you want this same agency, that failed to turn up the fact that he “drank too much” in 6 other investigations to find that now.
Have YOU been drinking?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

Exactly! And the point was made repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings when Democrats were wanting the FBI to investigate. It is merely a background investigation specifically focused on the allegations about sexual assault. It was never meant to be a criminal investigation.

Please, they would have looked at his serious drinking and partying in college and high school. And he would have been done. Because the truth is that he could have done it and doesn't remember. THAT IS THE TRUTH. He is unfit.

They were chicken shit to have the investigation look in to that. That is why they denied, refused and ducked all calls to have a FBI investigation.

And seeing BK yesterday, ducking questions like a guilty person, that just underscores why they needed an investigation.

This. Exactly this. No one can discern the truth from he-said-she-said. But there are MANY voices saying that he drank too much (and maybe still does), too many to be discredited. And he lied about that. He's not fit.

Sure. And, the 6 FBI background investigations caught none of that. But, you want this same agency, that failed to turn up the fact that he “drank too much” in 6 other investigations to find that now.
Have YOU been drinking?

They didn't look at the time in question. Sorry, but that has been covered extensively.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1. Lying about the meaning of the yearbook phrases
2. Ranting about Clinton conspiracy theories
3. Implying revenge once he's confirmed
4. Not staying calm during questioning

These are the reasons he is not an acceptable choice and will undermine the legitimacy of the SC if he is confirmed.

+10000

Time to move on from this circus. We don't need this clown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

Exactly! And the point was made repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings when Democrats were wanting the FBI to investigate. It is merely a background investigation specifically focused on the allegations about sexual assault. It was never meant to be a criminal investigation.

Please, they would have looked at his serious drinking and partying in college and high school. And he would have been done. Because the truth is that he could have done it and doesn't remember. THAT IS THE TRUTH. He is unfit.

They were chicken shit to have the investigation look in to that. That is why they denied, refused and ducked all calls to have a FBI investigation.

And seeing BK yesterday, ducking questions like a guilty person, that just underscores why they needed an investigation.

This. Exactly this. No one can discern the truth from he-said-she-said. But there are MANY voices saying that he drank too much (and maybe still does), too many to be discredited. And he lied about that. He's not fit.

Sure. And, the 6 FBI background investigations caught none of that. But, you want this same agency, that failed to turn up the fact that he “drank too much” in 6 other investigations to find that now.
Have YOU been drinking?

No one had come out and publicly claimed to a victim of his. Now they are sharing their truth.

[Anonymous]

Democrats will fight ANY conservative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

Exactly! And the point was made repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings when Democrats were wanting the FBI to investigate. It is merely a background investigation specifically focused on the allegations about sexual assault. It was never meant to be a criminal investigation.

Please, they would have looked at his serious drinking and partying in college and high school. And he would have been done. Because the truth is that he could have done it and doesn't remember. THAT IS THE TRUTH. He is unfit.

They were chicken shit to have the investigation look in to that. That is why they denied, refused and ducked all calls to have a FBI investigation.

And seeing BK yesterday, ducking questions like a guilty person, that just underscores why they needed an investigation.

This. Exactly this. No one can discern the truth from he-said-she-said. But there are MANY voices saying that he drank too much (and maybe still does), too many to be discredited. And he lied about that. He's not fit.

Sure. And, the 6 FBI background investigations caught none of that. But, you want this same agency, that failed to turn up the fact that he “drank too much” in 6 other investigations to find that now.
Have YOU been drinking?

They didn't look at the time in question. Sorry, but that has been covered extensively.

How in the hell would you know what they looked at? My spouse has been through numerous background investigations, and I can assure you that they did go back to the HS years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Avenatti’s new client has a checkered past with questionable claims. I really hope they charge her (and Avenatti) with making false allegations.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36503/kavanaugh-accuser-lied-about-background-has-ryan-saavedra

Go to the link to the WSJ story from Daily Wire, and you'll find the story that states that Debra Katz represented Swetnick in sexual harassment complaint she lodged against a former employer, New York Life Insurance.


Roughly a decade ago, Ms. Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter. Representing her in the complaint was the firm run by Debra Katz, the lawyer currently representing Dr. Ford. The company ultimately reached a financial settlement with Ms. Swetnick, the people said.

Coincidences pile up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

Of course that POS Dumpus LIED when he tweeted that the FBI will do a full investigation!!!

Of course that POS Dumpus ALWAYS lies.

So the "investigation" is a SHAM. A total SHAM.

The NYT just reported this. Who is surprised?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is apparently going to interview 4 witnesses about the sexual assault allegations, but it won't be a full fledged criminal investigation. The WH will then decide based on these findings, as reported in NYT.

They don’t do criminal investigations IRT sexual assault. They do background investigations.
I don’t know how many times this has to be repeated.

Exactly! And the point was made repeatedly during the Kavanaugh hearings when Democrats were wanting the FBI to investigate. It is merely a background investigation specifically focused on the allegations about sexual assault. It was never meant to be a criminal investigation.

Please, they would have looked at his serious drinking and partying in college and high school. And he would have been done. Because the truth is that he could have done it and doesn't remember. THAT IS THE TRUTH. He is unfit.

They were chicken shit to have the investigation look in to that. That is why they denied, refused and ducked all calls to have a FBI investigation.

And seeing BK yesterday, ducking questions like a guilty person, that just underscores why they needed an investigation.

This. Exactly this. No one can discern the truth from he-said-she-said. But there are MANY voices saying that he drank too much (and maybe still does), too many to be discredited. And he lied about that. He's not fit.

Sure. And, the 6 FBI background investigations caught none of that. But, you want this same agency, that failed to turn up the fact that he “drank too much” in 6 other investigations to find that now.
Have YOU been drinking?

No one had come out and publicly claimed to a victim of his. Now they are sharing their truth.

That is the key. It is HER truth. Not, THE truth.
Huge difference.