Barr personally asked foreign intelligence officials to aid inquiry into US CIA, FBI officials

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Flynn’s case should be dismissed. This is outrageous and shows how corrupt the whole thing is

He pled guilty and reaffirmed his crimes before the judge a year ago. If he had that much of a problem with it, he should not have accepted the plea deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

What is your explanation for why there were even talking about an insurance policy? Why were they discussing whether or not they thought Trump would get elected in McCabe's office? Why were they even discussing that with McCabe? Why does that even matter? If you are going to investigate wrongdoing, investigate it. Whether he got elected or not should not have had any bearing on the investigation or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

What is your explanation for why there were even talking about an insurance policy? Why were they discussing whether or not they thought Trump would get elected in McCabe's office? Why were they even discussing that with McCabe? Why does that even matter? If you are going to investigate wrongdoing, investigate it. Whether he got elected or not should not have had any bearing on the investigation or not.

How about because they are human beings and they have opinions? At worst, they violated the Hatch Act by talking about their political views at work. No evidence their political views affected their work. None.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

What is your explanation for why there were even talking about an insurance policy? Why were they discussing whether or not they thought Trump would get elected in McCabe's office? Why were they even discussing that with McCabe? Why does that even matter? If you are going to investigate wrongdoing, investigate it. Whether he got elected or not should not have had any bearing on the investigation or not.

How about because they are human beings and they have opinions? At worst, they violated the Hatch Act by talking about their political views at work. No evidence their political views affected their work. None.

Ha! Ha! Ha! Can someone please prick your little bubble?
-NP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

What is your explanation for why there were even talking about an insurance policy? Why were they discussing whether or not they thought Trump would get elected in McCabe's office? Why were they even discussing that with McCabe? Why does that even matter? If you are going to investigate wrongdoing, investigate it. Whether he got elected or not should not have had any bearing on the investigation or not.

How about because they are human beings and they have opinions? At worst, they violated the Hatch Act by talking about their political views at work. No evidence their political views affected their work. None.

Ha! Ha! Ha! Can someone please prick your little bubble?
-NP

Horowitz already cleared them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn’s case should be dismissed. This is outrageous and shows how corrupt the whole thing is

Great! Then his court martial can begin. They've been waiting patiently for a long time now.

Good luck with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

What is your explanation for why there were even talking about an insurance policy? Why were they discussing whether or not they thought Trump would get elected in McCabe's office? Why were they even discussing that with McCabe? Why does that even matter? If you are going to investigate wrongdoing, investigate it. Whether he got elected or not should not have had any bearing on the investigation or not.

Word has it that McCabe was offered a pre-indictment plea deal, which he refused.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn’s case should be dismissed. This is outrageous and shows how corrupt the whole thing is

Great! Then his court martial can begin. They've been waiting patiently for a long time now.

Good luck with that.

You think General Flynn isn't a criminal? He's just misunderstood...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

What is your explanation for why there were even talking about an insurance policy? Why were they discussing whether or not they thought Trump would get elected in McCabe's office? Why were they even discussing that with McCabe? Why does that even matter? If you are going to investigate wrongdoing, investigate it. Whether he got elected or not should not have had any bearing on the investigation or not.

How about because they are human beings and they have opinions? At worst, they violated the Hatch Act by talking about their political views at work. No evidence their political views affected their work. None.

“Insurance policy” anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

What is your explanation for why there were even talking about an insurance policy? Why were they discussing whether or not they thought Trump would get elected in McCabe's office? Why were they even discussing that with McCabe? Why does that even matter? If you are going to investigate wrongdoing, investigate it. Whether he got elected or not should not have had any bearing on the investigation or not.

Word has it that McCabe was offered a pre-indictment plea deal, which he refused.

Smart of him. Since he's not indicted.

So embarrassing for DOJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

What is your explanation for why there were even talking about an insurance policy? Why were they discussing whether or not they thought Trump would get elected in McCabe's office? Why were they even discussing that with McCabe? Why does that even matter? If you are going to investigate wrongdoing, investigate it. Whether he got elected or not should not have had any bearing on the investigation or not.

How about because they are human beings and they have opinions? At worst, they violated the Hatch Act by talking about their political views at work. No evidence their political views affected their work. None.

“Insurance policy” anyone?

Somehow Peter and Lisa made those Russian trolls do their trolling, made Papadapalous meet with the Australian diplomat, made Junior meet with Veselnitskaya. Also they control the weather and the stock market.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn’s case should be dismissed. This is outrageous and shows how corrupt the whole thing is

He pled guilty and reaffirmed his crimes before the judge a year ago. If he had that much of a problem with it, he should not have accepted the plea deal.

And, now they have discovered that the prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence.
This will not make Sullivan happy. He's been there before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

What is your explanation for why there were even talking about an insurance policy? Why were they discussing whether or not they thought Trump would get elected in McCabe's office? Why were they even discussing that with McCabe? Why does that even matter? If you are going to investigate wrongdoing, investigate it. Whether he got elected or not should not have had any bearing on the investigation or not.

How about because they are human beings and they have opinions? At worst, they violated the Hatch Act by talking about their political views at work. No evidence their political views affected their work. None.

“Insurance policy” anyone?

Somehow Peter and Lisa made those Russian trolls do their trolling, made Papadapalous meet with the Australian diplomat, made Junior meet with Veselnitskaya. Also they control the weather and the stock market.

Actually, not sure about the weather and the stock market, but evidence is coming to light that the meeting with the Australian dip and the meeting with Veselnitskaya were both set-ups.
This will likely be revealed as fact once this investigation is complete.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Understand how laughable the administration's conspiracy theory is. Obama and the FBI spied on Trump and investigated fake crimes, but then waited, let him win, and didn't release anything until after the election?

"No, no he's not. We'll stop it" -- Peter Stzrok, FBI agent who opened the Russia interference investigation.

And what exactly did he do to stop Trump? He opened a secret investigation and forget to tell anyone about until after the election. He had lots of salacious dirt from the Steele memo but he released NONE of it publicly until Buzzfeed published it after the election. He got 17 IC agencies to conclude that Russia interfered in the election but kept them from telling anyone until after the election.

That's the worst insurance policy in the world.

They didn't think he was going to win. They thought Hillary was going to win. The insurance policy was trying to come up with something to impeach him on, in case he did win. That's why one of the texts said "I'm afraid we can't take that chance".

What????

The mere fact that Hillary was under investigation a week before the election helped sink her campaign. So you are telling me that instead of just leaking to the press to hurt Trump like a normal Washington swampdweller, Strzok developed an illegal plot to, umm... trick(coerce?) Congress into impeaching Trump?

Have.you been watching "Pinky and the Brain" reruns?

What is your explanation for why there were even talking about an insurance policy? Why were they discussing whether or not they thought Trump would get elected in McCabe's office? Why were they even discussing that with McCabe? Why does that even matter? If you are going to investigate wrongdoing, investigate it. Whether he got elected or not should not have had any bearing on the investigation or not.

Word has it that McCabe was offered a pre-indictment plea deal, which he refused.

So, a grand jury was impaneled.