Whistleblower complaint released

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone here tell me why Pelosi announced impeachment when the transcript had not been released?

Answer: She and Dems had the report of the whistleblower, which looked damaging. They didn't expect for Trump to release the actual transcript. When he did, it created an incongruence between what the whistleblower said he said, and what he actually said. So then, there had to be a re-interpretation of the transcript to fit the whistleblower's report. The most comment reinterpretation is that it was altered.

The buffoon in the OO admitted he extorted the president of Ukraine...with US resources as leverage. You add that to the myriad of impeachable offenses Trump has committed over 3 years, what the hell does Pelosi need to wait for??

So she moved to impeach over what you feel was an extortion, but the President of Ukraine said he wasn't extorted? That's a winning argument.

He said he wasn’t extorted right next to the extorter. Would you ask your friend if her husband is beating her in front of him and expect to get a valid answer?

Again you are making that up. Speculation at best.

Um, not making up that Zelensky was asked that question while sitting right next to Trump. And dependent on him for hundreds of millions of dollars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a single individual who was slated to monitor the Presidents calls used the whistleblower act to report any of this. Because there was nothing to tell. Instead we are to believe they were concerned, so told the whistleblower instead? Really?

You're surprised by that? You don't think it's believable?

Have you ever used Twitter?

If it was so alarming, then why didn't any of the primary listeners report it using the whistleblower act?

Because they're cowards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where was the whistleblower today? Why did we get Adam Schiff? Why can't the whistleblower himself be asked questions?

Schiff knows who the whistleblower is and so does his staff. Many of the news articles cited by the whistleblower are the same news articles cited by Adam Schiff.

Seems Schiff is a leaker and should release his phone records.

The whistleblower complaint was written like a lawyer. One of his lawyers worked for Schumer and Clinton. Why did the whistleblower pick THAT lawyer?

One of his lawyers interned for Schumer for five months and for Clinton for five months, seemingly while he was in college. Long before he went to law school. If you have to work that hard to create an appearance of bias, you fail.

But he didn't intern for Rs now did he?

Because there were no R Senators where he lived.

You can intern for any senator you want.

More convienient to intern for New York Senators when you’re at Syracuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where was the whistleblower today? Why did we get Adam Schiff? Why can't the whistleblower himself be asked questions?

Schiff knows who the whistleblower is and so does his staff. Many of the news articles cited by the whistleblower are the same news articles cited by Adam Schiff.

Seems Schiff is a leaker and should release his phone records.

The whistleblower complaint was written like a lawyer. One of his lawyers worked for Schumer and Clinton. Why did the whistleblower pick THAT lawyer?

One of his lawyers interned for Schumer for five months and for Clinton for five months, seemingly while he was in college. Long before he went to law school. If you have to work that hard to create an appearance of bias, you fail.

But he didn't intern for Rs now did he?

Because there were no R Senators where he lived.

You can intern for any senator you want.

More convienient to intern for New York Senators when you’re at Syracuse.

And, to intern with people you are ideologically on par with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Schiff knows who the whistleblower is and so does his staff.

Source? Other than your own *ss?

They moved to impeach before the transcript came out. They knew what was in the phone call (or thought they did) because they had the whistleblower's lawyer-written letter already.

They moved to impeach because the White House was illegally blocking the release of the complaint to the House. When the ICIG has instructed that a complaint be sent to the House Intelligence Committee and the White House intervenes to prevent that from happening, it's not a huge leap to assume that the White House has done this to protect itself.

Actually, the complaint was not released because it was heresay and couldn't be confirmed.

Um. The IC IG interviewed witnesses before deciding the complaint was credible and urgent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone here tell me why Pelosi announced impeachment when the transcript had not been released?

Answer: She and Dems had the report of the whistleblower, which looked damaging. They didn't expect for Trump to release the actual transcript. When he did, it created an incongruence between what the whistleblower said he said, and what he actually said. So then, there had to be a re-interpretation of the transcript to fit the whistleblower's report. The most comment reinterpretation is that it was altered.

The buffoon in the OO admitted he extorted the president of Ukraine...with US resources as leverage. You add that to the myriad of impeachable offenses Trump has committed over 3 years, what the hell does Pelosi need to wait for??

So she moved to impeach over what you feel was an extortion, but the President of Ukraine said he wasn't extorted? That's a winning argument.

He said he wasn’t extorted right next to the extorter. Would you ask your friend if her husband is beating her in front of him and expect to get a valid answer?

Again you are making that up. Speculation at best.

Hint: I’m sure your Mom thinks you’re brilliant, but please don’t apply for law school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gosh, I thought all the IC and LEA loved Trump, according to Trumpsters.

They didn’t swear an oath to uphold Trump.

So, Trumpters who claimed that LEA and IC love Trump were wrong then? Say it ain't so!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone here tell me why Pelosi announced impeachment when the transcript had not been released?

Answer: She and Dems had the report of the whistleblower, which looked damaging. They didn't expect for Trump to release the actual transcript. When he did, it created an incongruence between what the whistleblower said he said, and what he actually said. So then, there had to be a re-interpretation of the transcript to fit the whistleblower's report. The most comment reinterpretation is that it was altered.

The buffoon in the OO admitted he extorted the president of Ukraine...with US resources as leverage. You add that to the myriad of impeachable offenses Trump has committed over 3 years, what the hell does Pelosi need to wait for??

So she moved to impeach over what you feel was an extortion, but the President of Ukraine said he wasn't extorted? That's a winning argument.

He said he wasn’t extorted right next to the extorter. Would you ask your friend if her husband is beating her in front of him and expect to get a valid answer?

Again you are making that up. Speculation at best.

Um, not making up that Zelensky was asked that question while sitting right next to Trump. And dependent on him for hundreds of millions of dollars.

So, you are accusing Zelensky is lying? But, everything the whistleblower says is absolute truth?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where was the whistleblower today? Why did we get Adam Schiff? Why can't the whistleblower himself be asked questions?

Schiff knows who the whistleblower is and so does his staff. Many of the news articles cited by the whistleblower are the same news articles cited by Adam Schiff.

Seems Schiff is a leaker and should release his phone records.

The whistleblower complaint was written like a lawyer. One of his lawyers worked for Schumer and Clinton. Why did the whistleblower pick THAT lawyer?

One of his lawyers interned for Schumer for five months and for Clinton for five months, seemingly while he was in college. Long before he went to law school. If you have to work that hard to create an appearance of bias, you fail.

The lawyers have much more than that re: links to Clinton and other Dems:

Whatever. Most lawyers are “Dems” because they aren’t poorly educated.

Yet more speculation and made up facts.

Not making up that lawyers are more likely to lean left.
http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/lawyers-ideologies.pdf

[Anonymous]

Okay, someone explain this: Russia knew that Trump had told his officials not to go to Zelensky's inauguration. They reported it on Russian TV in May. American media didn't know it, but the whistleblower complaint confirms that Trump told Pence not to go.

https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/1177234658058285056

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone here tell me why Pelosi announced impeachment when the transcript had not been released?

Answer: She and Dems had the report of the whistleblower, which looked damaging. They didn't expect for Trump to release the actual transcript. When he did, it created an incongruence between what the whistleblower said he said, and what he actually said. So then, there had to be a re-interpretation of the transcript to fit the whistleblower's report. The most comment reinterpretation is that it was altered.

The buffoon in the OO admitted he extorted the president of Ukraine...with US resources as leverage. You add that to the myriad of impeachable offenses Trump has committed over 3 years, what the hell does Pelosi need to wait for??

So she moved to impeach over what you feel was an extortion, but the President of Ukraine said he wasn't extorted? That's a winning argument.

He said he wasn’t extorted right next to the extorter. Would you ask your friend if her husband is beating her in front of him and expect to get a valid answer?

Again you are making that up. Speculation at best.

Um, not making up that Zelensky was asked that question while sitting right next to Trump. And dependent on him for hundreds of millions of dollars.

So, you are accusing Zelensky is lying? But, everything the whistleblower says is absolute truth?

Zelensky is being diplomatic by not getting the guy who he’d really like hundreds of millions of dollars from mad right in front of him. Surely you can understand that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where was the whistleblower today? Why did we get Adam Schiff? Why can't the whistleblower himself be asked questions?

Schiff knows who the whistleblower is and so does his staff. Many of the news articles cited by the whistleblower are the same news articles cited by Adam Schiff.

Seems Schiff is a leaker and should release his phone records.

The whistleblower complaint was written like a lawyer. One of his lawyers worked for Schumer and Clinton. Why did the whistleblower pick THAT lawyer?

One of his lawyers interned for Schumer for five months and for Clinton for five months, seemingly while he was in college. Long before he went to law school. If you have to work that hard to create an appearance of bias, you fail.

But he didn't intern for Rs now did he?

Because there were no R Senators where he lived.

You can intern for any senator you want.

More convienient to intern for New York Senators when you’re at Syracuse.

And, to intern with people you are ideologically on par with.

Honestly I don't understand this line of attack.

Whistleblower needs a lawyer. Do you expect him/her to hire a Trump supporter to be his lawyer? Who cares if his lawyer had contact with Schumer and Clinton years ago? What does that even suggest to you? To me it suggests the lawyer has a lot of connections and is probably sharp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gosh, I thought all the IC and LEA loved Trump, according to Trumpsters.

They didn’t swear an oath to uphold Trump.

So, Trumpters who claimed that LEA and IC love Trump were wrong then? Say it ain't so!!!!!

God, you’re dumb.

[Anonymous]

Democrats: Nothing like a threat between friends:

"While choosing his words carefully, Murphy made clear — by his own account — that Ukraine currently enjoyed bipartisan support for its U.S. aid but that could be jeopardized if the new president acquiesced to requests by President Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani to investigate past corruption allegations involving Americans, including former Vice President Joe Biden’s family.

Murphy boasted after the meeting that he told the new Ukrainian leader that U.S. aid was his country’s “most important asset” and it would be viewed as election meddling and “disastrous for long-term U.S.-Ukraine relations” to bend to the wishes of Trump and Giuliani.

"I told Zelensky that he should not insert himself or his government into American politics. I cautioned him that complying with the demands of the President's campaign representatives to investigate a political rival of the President would gravely damage the U.S.-Ukraine relationship. There are few things that Republicans and Democrats agree on in Washington these days, and support for Ukraine is one of them," Murphy told me today, confirming what he told Ukraine's leader."

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/462658-lets-get-real-democrats-were-first-to-enlist-ukraine-in-us-elections

https://www.murphy.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/murphy-discusses-recent-travel-to-germany-kosovo-serbia-and-ukraine

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where was the whistleblower today? Why did we get Adam Schiff? Why can't the whistleblower himself be asked questions?

Schiff knows who the whistleblower is and so does his staff. Many of the news articles cited by the whistleblower are the same news articles cited by Adam Schiff.

Seems Schiff is a leaker and should release his phone records.

The whistleblower complaint was written like a lawyer. One of his lawyers worked for Schumer and Clinton. Why did the whistleblower pick THAT lawyer?

One of his lawyers interned for Schumer for five months and for Clinton for five months, seemingly while he was in college. Long before he went to law school. If you have to work that hard to create an appearance of bias, you fail.

But he didn't intern for Rs now did he?

Because there were no R Senators where he lived.

You can intern for any senator you want.

More convienient to intern for New York Senators when you’re at Syracuse.

And, to intern with people you are ideologically on par with.

The guy was a whistleblower himself while with the CIA during the Obama administration. He really does have quite a resume beyond his college internships which seem to be the only thing you care about. https://compassrosepllc.com/bakaj/