new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

I'm starting to believe Trump about the NYT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is simply unacceptable. First, that they failed to include this information in their article and second, that it took the entire day to issue this correction.

The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh -- hours after virtually all 2020 Democratic presidential candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh.

The update included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the supposed sexual assault in question at all. The Times also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no comment about the episode.


The only first-hand statement concerning the supposed attack in the original piece, which was published on Saturday, came from a Clinton-connected lawyer who claimed to have witnessed it.

The Times' revision says: "Editors' Note: An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book's account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party. The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article."

The update came only after The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway, who reviewed an advance copy of the book, first flagged the article's omission on Twitter -- prompting other commentators to press the issue.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nyt-kavanaugh-bombshell-goes-bust-after-2020-dems-use-it-to-call-for-impeachment

First of all, we don't trust your source. Secondly, those esteemed NY Times journalists required sufficient time to ponder, reflect, and make the necessary corrections. And, of course, the time allowed for adequate spin and outrage during the delay.

am I being punked? Yup. completely punked. The print edition is merely a draft. Please do read it as such and submit factual corrections to our 1800FU*CKYOU. Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those of us, on those multi-day Kavanaugh threads at the time, who said, the FBI wasn't investigating the allegations fully and were pooh-poohed by the apologists, I hope we come to a point where Kavanaugh is impeached for lying to the Senate committee.

Oh, and who paid his 6 figures debts?

Yep this. All of us who asserted, correctly, that it wasn't properly investigated were right. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

In other words, she doesn’t want her life to be ruined by relentless harpies like you people. I can’t blame her.

Really. Show us an example of a ruined life? All the liars thus far have lived their lives just fine. Making up things and coming forward hasn’t hurt anybody except the accused.

That’s ok. The ruined lives along the way are all fine. Means justifies the end to the liberal mind. A mind that manages to lie itself in some weird loop. Liberalism is a mental disease devoid of logic and facts. This board shows that in spades.

Do you know how many times Christie Blasey Ford had to move because of death threats from crazed right wingers? The Republican smear machine is a terrible thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Swinging dicks at a frat party 30 years ago? I literally could not care less.

+1

That's fine. But, that says a lot about you. None of it good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

In other words, she doesn’t want her life to be ruined by relentless harpies like you people. I can’t blame her.

Really. Show us an example of a ruined life? All the liars thus far have lived their lives just fine. Making up things and coming forward hasn’t hurt anybody except the accused.

That’s ok. The ruined lives along the way are all fine. Means justifies the end to the liberal mind. A mind that manages to lie itself in some weird loop. Liberalism is a mental disease devoid of logic and facts. This board shows that in spades.

Aside from the death threats and dragging her name through the mud that CBF endured, what could she possibly be afraid of? Amirite?

[Anonymous]

Somebody needs to let the WaPo know about the major revision to the NYTimes story.
An opinion piece was written, and published, based on the original article and the totally uncorroborated accusations. Of course, the author accepted the allegations as fact.

Man, the NYTimes is managing to make all these liberal media look like crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

In other words, she doesn’t want her life to be ruined by relentless harpies like you people. I can’t blame her.

Really. Show us an example of a ruined life? All the liars thus far have lived their lives just fine. Making up things and coming forward hasn’t hurt anybody except the accused.

That’s ok. The ruined lives along the way are all fine. Means justifies the end to the liberal mind. A mind that manages to lie itself in some weird loop. Liberalism is a mental disease devoid of logic and facts. This board shows that in spades.

Christine Blasey Ford, Kavenaugh’s first accuser (attempted rape, if you recall). Her life will never be the same because of crazies like you. Meanwhile, her attempted rapist sits on the Supreme Court. I would’t say that his life is in ruins. But you know that - and you enjoy that she will punished forever for being a victim of entitled male aggression, misogynism, and sheer stupidity from right wingers who refuse to even consider that the deeply flawed people that they admire could be sexual predators, conmen, and traitors. If you people weren’t so loathsome, I’d almost feel sorry for you.

One can easily take this part of your statement and insert the words Monica Lewinsky ("that woman" as described by Bill Clinton), Bill Clinton, and Democrats.

Yes, you could. And I think 20+ years later most Democrats would agree. And people have learned a lot about these types of situations and what is not acceptable behavior in elected officials, much less someone with a lifetime appointment. Well, maybe you and your whataboutisms haven't learned much. The rest of us have.

And FTR Clinton would not be electable in 2019.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

such a teeny weeny omission...by such esteemed journalists...we're all SHOCKED at the oversight!

The thing is when I read this story, I thought, "give it 24 hours before they reverse". I can honestly say my heart rate didn't even fluctuate when I read this since the humiliation of the once venerable institution of journalism is complete. I wish the President would find such grace, be less publicly reactive and trust more.

+1 PP here. I agree.

You're a despicable person. Both you and the PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

In other words, she doesn’t want her life to be ruined by relentless harpies like you people. I can’t blame her.

Really. Show us an example of a ruined life? All the liars thus far have lived their lives just fine. Making up things and coming forward hasn’t hurt anybody except the accused.

That’s ok. The ruined lives along the way are all fine. Means justifies the end to the liberal mind. A mind that manages to lie itself in some weird loop. Liberalism is a mental disease devoid of logic and facts. This board shows that in spades.

Aside from the death threats and dragging her name through the mud that CBF endured, what could she possibly be afraid of? Amirite?

Lying is a terrible thing. Might want to read about why she constructed that door.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Swinging dicks at a frat party 30 years ago? I literally could not care less.

+1

That's fine. But, that says a lot about you. None of it good.

You do recognize your narrative has been undermined resembling the separation of the San Andreas fault, right? That says a lot about you. None of it good. This is the point where you say, "Well, that was embarrassing."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

such a teeny weeny omission...by such esteemed journalists...we're all SHOCKED at the oversight!

The thing is when I read this story, I thought, "give it 24 hours before they reverse". I can honestly say my heart rate didn't even fluctuate when I read this since the humiliation of the once venerable institution of journalism is complete. I wish the President would find such grace, be less publicly reactive and trust more.

+1 PP here. I agree.

You're a despicable person. Both you and the PP.

Coming from you, that's a compliment. You fell for a scam. I'd be lashing out like a vicious animal cornered also.

Hahahahahaha!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Somebody needs to let the WaPo know about the major revision to the NYTimes story.
An opinion piece was written, and published, based on the original article and the totally uncorroborated accusations. Of course, the author accepted the allegations as fact.

Man, the NYTimes is managing to make all these liberal media look like crap.

Circular journalism at it's finest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

such a teeny weeny omission...by such esteemed journalists...we're all SHOCKED at the oversight!

The thing is when I read this story, I thought, "give it 24 hours before they reverse". I can honestly say my heart rate didn't even fluctuate when I read this since the humiliation of the once venerable institution of journalism is complete. I wish the President would find such grace, be less publicly reactive and trust more.

+1 PP here. I agree.

You're a despicable person. Both you and the PP.

What's despicable about recognizing that some NY Times journalists make stories fit their narrative and political views and that Trump should be less publicly reactive? I think that would be a good thing!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maine Senator Susan Collins voted to confirm him. trump pick.

And we used to be able to admire the Supreme Court. We didn’t always agree with them but we admired them. The Republicans changed all that. There is nothing left of our once great country to admire.

Would you take a look at what this sad creature posted. Poor thing.

The good news is the poster can now admire our great country again! Hoorah!