Bill Ackman forgives wife for plagiarism

[Anonymous]

wife is Israeli and served with IDF? linked to Epstein and Lex Fridman? comes from nowhere and is in a dubious MIT PhD program…submits a rubbish dissertation, as if she knew it’d be rubber stamped… is offered tenure at MIT in a dubious dept…. puff pieces about what a groundbreaking genius she supposedly is, when all she does is regurgitate gobbledygook buzzwords and dress provocatively….dates Bras Pitt…..marries a billionaire Zionist…..and now has her dork husband waging a crusade on elite campuses to root out anti-Zionists?

I am not saying she’s a Mossad honeypot, but as an avid reader of Ian Fleming novels, she sure checks a lot of boxes……

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kind of a weird situation. You find out your pilot doesn't have a license until after he takes off, flies through a thunderstorm, and lands the plane a continent away.

Is the value is the license or the ability?

The pilot still requires a license to fly, no matter what the ability. And no one should be able to obtain a PhD after directly plagiarizing Wikipedia and ultimately run a tech business.

I'm pretty sure Mark Zuckerberg has been running Facebook with just a high school diploma?

The Zuck created Facebook IN SPITE of Harvard. They wanted him to shut it down, hence why he dropped out of the university. He saw something powerful, while Larry Summers said it wasn't going to amount to much LOL

However, Harvard was where Zuckerberg met the partners with which he co-created Facebook (his roommates). And that's where ol' Ackman met the business partner with which he launched his first business: the investment firm Gotham Partners. So, at minimum, as much as many of you like to deride elite universities, they are at minimum a place where successful people make important connections.

Ackman was born a billionaire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:wife is Israeli and served with IDF? linked to Epstein and Lex Fridman? comes from nowhere and is in a dubious MIT PhD program…submits a rubbish dissertation, as if she knew it’d be rubber stamped… is offered tenure at MIT in a dubious dept…. puff pieces about what a groundbreaking genius she supposedly is, when all she does is regurgitate gobbledygook buzzwords and dress provocatively….dates Bras Pitt…..marries a billionaire Zionist…..and now has her dork husband waging a crusade on elite campuses to root out anti-Zionists?


I am not saying she’s a Mossad honeypot, but as an avid reader of Ian Fleming novels, she sure checks a lot of boxes……

She needs to resign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hypocrisy is exactly why the younger generation don't uphold our political system.

This is about academics, not politics.

Wrong. Don't be obtuse. If Gay had banned every single Pro-Palestinian student from campus, Ackman would've done EVERYTHING to protect her. This whole thing has come to surface specifically because Zionists decided to attack along with gross, far-right swine like Rufo who also used "anti-semitism" for his actual obsession "DEI. " Ackman ended up opening himself up and exposed for the glaringly hypocritical pos he is, to go along w/ being all-around repugnant. Same with everyone so concerned about the supposed "mass rape," yet the overwhelming majority of verified child rapists from Epstein's circle are Zionists. They go quiet on that fact.

The people in academia who are specifically being targeted, are people not sufficiently up Israel's backside. Be a Zionist who doxxes and attacks anyone pro-Palestinian and Ackman would've looked the other way on Gay. Period.

And THAT is why younger people are Pro-Palestinian. They see the glaring, despicable hypocrisy of these people. Ackman's wife is far worse specifically because she's an *arrogant* plagiarist who knew what she had done and knew her racist, despicable monster of a husband was using "plagiarism" as the impetus for his Zionist witchhunt and thought her own behavior wouldn't be discovered.

[phone]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is everything wrong with the world and a prime example of how money corrupts the mind and the soul. He demonstrates zero intellectual or moral consistency in his positions, and DEI only matters to him if it's about antisemistism but not for anyone else. Other than his Judaism he is your basic privileged rich white guy who thinks he is smarter than everyone else and that the world should revolve around him. It's only a matter of time before he runs for office as Trunp 2.0.

He is white, male, and rich, what does his religion have to do with his obnoxious stance?

My point obviously is that he uses his status in a minority religion as a convenient cudgel and to justify his behavior.

Would you say the same about a wealthy black donor who decided to speak up and refuse to continue donating upon the discovery that the university had no problem with protesters screaming ugly things about black people and allowing black people to be harassed? We'll wait while you twist yourself into a pretzel, trying to answer.
DP

Um, white American jews aren’t minorities and have never faced hardships remotely close to the history of American blacks.

[phone]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is everything wrong with the world and a prime example of how money corrupts the mind and the soul. He demonstrates zero intellectual or moral consistency in his positions, and DEI only matters to him if it's about antisemistism but not for anyone else. Other than his Judaism he is your basic privileged rich white guy who thinks he is smarter than everyone else and that the world should revolve around him. It's only a matter of time before he runs for office as Trunp 2.0.

He is white, male, and rich, what does his religion have to do with his obnoxious stance?

My point obviously is that he uses his status in a minority religion as a convenient cudgel and to justify his behavior.

Would you say the same about a wealthy black donor who decided to speak up and refuse to continue donating upon the discovery that the university had no problem with protesters screaming ugly things about black people and allowing black people to be harassed? We'll wait while you twist yourself into a pretzel, trying to answer.
DP

Um, white American jews aren’t minorities and have never faced hardships remotely close to the history of American blacks.

OMG. No words.

Are they really minorities in the sense that a black person is though? You’d never guess who’s jewish if they didn’t announce it. Can you identify a catholic? a buddhist? I can’t.

First of all, you do know the pro-Palestinian protests were/are taking aim at Israeli Jews - right?? And that plenty of American Jews - many of whom are related to the six million Jews murdered in the Holocaust - have been threatened by pro-Palestinian activists as a result, right??

JFC, I can't even believe this has to be explained, yet again.

the holocaust did not happen in America and did not last centuries.

The jewish holocaust is not American history. That’s a fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

If Bill is so invested in academic integrity he should care. If anyone should care it’s him. Oh and her PhD should be revoked.

If Oxman really is guilty of plagiarism, I honestly don’t see how MIT can continue to honor her PhD. If they just let it slide, it would destroy their academic reputation.

Because if they revoke hers, they will end up revoking the PhDs of most of their professors. And they know it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wife is Israeli and served with IDF? linked to Epstein and Lex Fridman? comes from nowhere and is in a dubious MIT PhD program…submits a rubbish dissertation, as if she knew it’d be rubber stamped… is offered tenure at MIT in a dubious dept…. puff pieces about what a groundbreaking genius she supposedly is, when all she does is regurgitate gobbledygook buzzwords and dress provocatively….dates Bras Pitt…..marries a billionaire Zionist…..and now has her dork husband waging a crusade on elite campuses to root out anti-Zionists?


I am not saying she’s a Mossad honeypot, but as an avid reader of Ian Fleming novels, she sure checks a lot of boxes……

She needs to resign.

From what, specifically?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:wife is Israeli and served with IDF? linked to Epstein and Lex Fridman? comes from nowhere and is in a dubious MIT PhD program…submits a rubbish dissertation, as if she knew it’d be rubber stamped… is offered tenure at MIT in a dubious dept…. puff pieces about what a groundbreaking genius she supposedly is, when all she does is regurgitate gobbledygook buzzwords and dress provocatively….dates Bras Pitt…..marries a billionaire Zionist…..and now has her dork husband waging a crusade on elite campuses to root out anti-Zionists?

I am not saying she’s a Mossad honeypot, but as an avid reader of Ian Fleming novels, she sure checks a lot of boxes……

It is kind of crazy how openly misogynist the progessive left has become. Like, they don’t even hide it any more. Back in the Bernie Bro days at least they knew misogyny was something to be ashamed of, but now they embrace it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wife is Israeli and served with IDF? linked to Epstein and Lex Fridman? comes from nowhere and is in a dubious MIT PhD program…submits a rubbish dissertation, as if she knew it’d be rubber stamped… is offered tenure at MIT in a dubious dept…. puff pieces about what a groundbreaking genius she supposedly is, when all she does is regurgitate gobbledygook buzzwords and dress provocatively….dates Bras Pitt…..marries a billionaire Zionist…..and now has her dork husband waging a crusade on elite campuses to root out anti-Zionists?


I am not saying she’s a Mossad honeypot, but as an avid reader of Ian Fleming novels, she sure checks a lot of boxes……

She needs to resign.

From what, specifically?

Since she is the wife of the newly self appointed academic integrity luitenenant, at minimum it’s a bad look for her to just pretend her direct plagiarism of Wikipedia articles doesn’t exist. She was the head of a tech business that now seems fraudulent based on the fact that her dissertation was plagiarized. Sure, there are others like her, but since her husband wants to scrutinize everyone else, we really can’t or shouldn’t sweep this under the rug. We can start at Oxman and Gay and proceed to chase down more plagiarists from here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wife is Israeli and served with IDF? linked to Epstein and Lex Fridman? comes from nowhere and is in a dubious MIT PhD program…submits a rubbish dissertation, as if she knew it’d be rubber stamped… is offered tenure at MIT in a dubious dept…. puff pieces about what a groundbreaking genius she supposedly is, when all she does is regurgitate gobbledygook buzzwords and dress provocatively….dates Bras Pitt…..marries a billionaire Zionist…..and now has her dork husband waging a crusade on elite campuses to root out anti-Zionists?


I am not saying she’s a Mossad honeypot, but as an avid reader of Ian Fleming novels, she sure checks a lot of boxes……

She needs to resign.

From what, specifically?

Since she is the wife of the newly self appointed academic integrity luitenenant, at minimum it’s a bad look for her to just pretend her direct plagiarism of Wikipedia articles doesn’t exist. She was the head of a tech business that now seems fraudulent based on the fact that her dissertation was plagiarized. Sure, there are others like her, but since her husband wants to scrutinize everyone else, we really can’t or shouldn’t sweep this under the rug. We can start at Oxman and Gay and proceed to chase down more plagiarists from here.

😂😂😂😂😂

So in other words, there is nothing for her to resign from. You are just having a tantrum. Love it.

[Anonymous]

Her PhD needs to go and probably her graduate and undergraduate degrees as well. God knows if you have to plagiarize from Wikipedia in a PhD dissertation what must her undergrad papers look like?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wife is Israeli and served with IDF? linked to Epstein and Lex Fridman? comes from nowhere and is in a dubious MIT PhD program…submits a rubbish dissertation, as if she knew it’d be rubber stamped… is offered tenure at MIT in a dubious dept…. puff pieces about what a groundbreaking genius she supposedly is, when all she does is regurgitate gobbledygook buzzwords and dress provocatively….dates Bras Pitt…..marries a billionaire Zionist…..and now has her dork husband waging a crusade on elite campuses to root out anti-Zionists?


I am not saying she’s a Mossad honeypot, but as an avid reader of Ian Fleming novels, she sure checks a lot of boxes……

She needs to resign.

From what, specifically?

Since she is the wife of the newly self appointed academic integrity luitenenant, at minimum it’s a bad look for her to just pretend her direct plagiarism of Wikipedia articles doesn’t exist. She was the head of a tech business that now seems fraudulent based on the fact that her dissertation was plagiarized. Sure, there are others like her, but since her husband wants to scrutinize everyone else, we really can’t or shouldn’t sweep this under the rug. We can start at Oxman and Gay and proceed to chase down more plagiarists from here.

😂😂😂😂😂

So in other words, there is nothing for her to resign from. You are just having a tantrum. Love it.

Resign from her PhD, there is that better? She is not highly educated, she took some classes but obviously missed the part that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Must’ve been absent that day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wife is Israeli and served with IDF? linked to Epstein and Lex Fridman? comes from nowhere and is in a dubious MIT PhD program…submits a rubbish dissertation, as if she knew it’d be rubber stamped… is offered tenure at MIT in a dubious dept…. puff pieces about what a groundbreaking genius she supposedly is, when all she does is regurgitate gobbledygook buzzwords and dress provocatively….dates Bras Pitt…..marries a billionaire Zionist…..and now has her dork husband waging a crusade on elite campuses to root out anti-Zionists?

I am not saying she’s a Mossad honeypot, but as an avid reader of Ian Fleming novels, she sure checks a lot of boxes……

It is kind of crazy how openly misogynist the progessive left has become. Like, they don’t even hide it any more. Back in the Bernie Bro days at least they knew misogyny was something to be ashamed of, but now they embrace it.

Why do you ascribe the views in the PP to "leftists"? I'm a leftist and don't agree with most things said in the previous post. It's one person just spouting off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

If Bill is so invested in academic integrity he should care. If anyone should care it’s him. Oh and her PhD should be revoked.

If Oxman really is guilty of plagiarism, I honestly don’t see how MIT can continue to honor her PhD. If they just let it slide, it would destroy their academic reputation.

Because if they revoke hers, they will end up revoking the PhDs of most of their professors. And they know it.

You’re full of it. Not everyone is a fraudulent grifter. This woman was never a serious academic. Who admitted such a dunce to an MIT PhD program in the first place?