Bill Ackman forgives wife for plagiarism

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

She absolutely cares. Such humiliation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

Yup.

What's real news is how Gay's fraud took down the credibility of Harvard and the whole woke-DEI industrial complex, including "Business Insider"

Ok so it’s ok to run a tech business with fake credentials? What if you found out that your cardiothoracic surgeon had fake credentials? How about a plastic surgeon? How about an electrician? Or a bus driver with no license?

[Anonymous]

Who TF cares about Harvard? No one normal goes to Harvard anyway

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

If Bill is so invested in academic integrity he should care. If anyone should care it’s him. Oh and her PhD should be revoked.

If Oxman really is guilty of plagiarism, I honestly don’t see how MIT can continue to honor her PhD. If they just let it slide, it would destroy their academic reputation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

Yup.

What's real news is how Gay's fraud took down the credibility of Harvard and the whole woke-DEI industrial complex, including "Business Insider"

Ok so it’s ok to run a tech business with fake credentials? What if you found out that your cardiothoracic surgeon had fake credentials? How about a plastic surgeon? How about an electrician? Or a bus driver with no license?

Let's not exaggerate. Plagiarizing in your dissertation and/or in some academic articles does not mean that you have "fake credentials." And that goes for Gay and Oxman as well. They have actual PhDs, not fake ones, but have engaged in instances of plagiarism.

[Anonymous]

Kind of a weird situation. You find out your pilot doesn't have a license until after he takes off, flies through a thunderstorm, and lands the plane a continent away.

Is the value is the license or the ability?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

Yup.

What's real news is how Gay's fraud took down the credibility of Harvard and the whole woke-DEI industrial complex, including "Business Insider"

Ok so it’s ok to run a tech business with fake credentials? What if you found out that your cardiothoracic surgeon had fake credentials? How about a plastic surgeon? How about an electrician? Or a bus driver with no license?

Let's not exaggerate. Plagiarizing in your dissertation and/or in some academic articles does not mean that you have "fake credentials." And that goes for Gay and Oxman as well. They have actual PhDs, not fake ones, but have engaged in instances of plagiarism.

Should there be a zero tolerance policy when it comes to plagiarism? Should one instance of plagiarism in a dissertation completely invalidate a PhD?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

Yup.

What's real news is how Gay's fraud took down the credibility of Harvard and the whole woke-DEI industrial complex, including "Business Insider"

Ok so it’s ok to run a tech business with fake credentials? What if you found out that your cardiothoracic surgeon had fake credentials? How about a plastic surgeon? How about an electrician? Or a bus driver with no license?

Let's not exaggerate. Plagiarizing in your dissertation and/or in some academic articles does not mean that you have "fake credentials." And that goes for Gay and Oxman as well. They have actual PhDs, not fake ones, but have engaged in instances of plagiarism.

Should there be a zero tolerance policy when it comes to plagiarism? Should one instance of plagiarism in a dissertation completely invalidate a PhD?

I don't think so personally, but I would be interested to know what the policies surrounding this are at universities and if they are similar or vary widely across universities. Any academics how know something about this issue care to weigh in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kind of a weird situation. You find out your pilot doesn't have a license until after he takes off, flies through a thunderstorm, and lands the plane a continent away.

Is the value is the license or the ability?

The pilot still requires a license to fly, no matter what the ability. And no one should be able to obtain a PhD after directly plagiarizing Wikipedia and ultimately run a tech business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

Yup.

What's real news is how Gay's fraud took down the credibility of Harvard and the whole woke-DEI industrial complex, including "Business Insider"

Ok so it’s ok to run a tech business with fake credentials? What if you found out that your cardiothoracic surgeon had fake credentials? How about a plastic surgeon? How about an electrician? Or a bus driver with no license?

Let's not exaggerate. Plagiarizing in your dissertation and/or in some academic articles does not mean that you have "fake credentials." And that goes for Gay and Oxman as well. They have actual PhDs, not fake ones, but have engaged in instances of plagiarism.

Should there be a zero tolerance policy when it comes to plagiarism? Should one instance of plagiarism in a dissertation completely invalidate a PhD?

It wasn’t a small mistake, this was pages upon pages, I believe, of directly plagiarized material from Wikipedia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

Yup.

What's real news is how Gay's fraud took down the credibility of Harvard and the whole woke-DEI industrial complex, including "Business Insider"

Ok so it’s ok to run a tech business with fake credentials? What if you found out that your cardiothoracic surgeon had fake credentials? How about a plastic surgeon? How about an electrician? Or a bus driver with no license?

Let's not exaggerate. Plagiarizing in your dissertation and/or in some academic articles does not mean that you have "fake credentials." And that goes for Gay and Oxman as well. They have actual PhDs, not fake ones, but have engaged in instances of plagiarism.

Should there be a zero tolerance policy when it comes to plagiarism? Should one instance of plagiarism in a dissertation completely invalidate a PhD?

I don't think so personally, but I would be interested to know what the policies surrounding this are at universities and if they are similar or vary widely across universities. Any academics how know something about this issue care to weigh in?

It seems like no university can afford to be known as the place where they let you get away with a little bit of plagiarism. They would become a laughingstock in the academic world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude lives too much online. He has $4b. He should be living the dream. Instead he spends his days tweeting while being a total ahole (Rittenhouse supporter, Epstein pal, profiting off the 08 financial meltdown, BS with shorting stocks after getting the SEC involved). Dude doesn’t know when the just shut up. Blowing himself up and taking down his wife#2. Mind boggling.

The problem isn’t just that he doesn’t know when to shut up. The problem is that he is using his wealth and reputation to go after people he doesn’t like and impose his will on others. Why aren’t more of us outraged that the billionaire class—of any political persuasion—has become so powerful ?

What is he doing beyond tweeting?

Apparently building a whole artificial intelligence company specifically to search out plagiarists at universities and newspapers. Starting with MIT the the newspaper tat outed his wife.

But the damage is done. He took down his own wife. He just looks like a clown now.

Except no-one cares about his wife's dissertation, and she is no longer in academia.

Yup.

What's real news is how Gay's fraud took down the credibility of Harvard and the whole woke-DEI industrial complex, including "Business Insider"

Ok so it’s ok to run a tech business with fake credentials? What if you found out that your cardiothoracic surgeon had fake credentials? How about a plastic surgeon? How about an electrician? Or a bus driver with no license?

Let's not exaggerate. Plagiarizing in your dissertation and/or in some academic articles does not mean that you have "fake credentials." And that goes for Gay and Oxman as well. They have actual PhDs, not fake ones, but have engaged in instances of plagiarism.

Should there be a zero tolerance policy when it comes to plagiarism? Should one instance of plagiarism in a dissertation completely invalidate a PhD?

it applies to undergrads who are expelled for less, yes same rules for all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kind of a weird situation. You find out your pilot doesn't have a license until after he takes off, flies through a thunderstorm, and lands the plane a continent away.

Is the value is the license or the ability?

The pilot still requires a license to fly, no matter what the ability. And no one should be able to obtain a PhD after directly plagiarizing Wikipedia and ultimately run a tech business.

I'm pretty sure Mark Zuckerberg has been running Facebook with just a high school diploma?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kind of a weird situation. You find out your pilot doesn't have a license until after he takes off, flies through a thunderstorm, and lands the plane a continent away.

Is the value is the license or the ability?

The pilot still requires a license to fly, no matter what the ability. And no one should be able to obtain a PhD after directly plagiarizing Wikipedia and ultimately run a tech business.

I'm pretty sure Mark Zuckerberg has been running Facebook with just a high school diploma?

The Zuck created Facebook IN SPITE of Harvard. They wanted him to shut it down, hence why he dropped out of the university. He saw something powerful, while Larry Summers said it wasn't going to amount to much LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kind of a weird situation. You find out your pilot doesn't have a license until after he takes off, flies through a thunderstorm, and lands the plane a continent away.

Is the value is the license or the ability?

The pilot still requires a license to fly, no matter what the ability. And no one should be able to obtain a PhD after directly plagiarizing Wikipedia and ultimately run a tech business.

I'm pretty sure Mark Zuckerberg has been running Facebook with just a high school diploma?

The Zuck created Facebook IN SPITE of Harvard. They wanted him to shut it down, hence why he dropped out of the university. He saw something powerful, while Larry Summers said it wasn't going to amount to much LOL

However, Harvard was where Zuckerberg met the partners with which he co-created Facebook (his roommates). And that's where ol' Ackman met the business partner with which he launched his first business: the investment firm Gotham Partners. So, at minimum, as much as many of you like to deride elite universities, they are at minimum a place where successful people make important connections.