Mother of 2 from VERY prominent Richmond family arrested by FBI for child p@rn, exploitation, etc

[Anonymous]

Her FB seems so NORMAL. They are hiding in plain sight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These links need a TW. This is really really awful

This many times over.

You mean like this, right before the link?

But the charging documents are here and major trigger warning

Because it’s already there…. You want a double TW?

I think the thread title is a trigger warning.

[Anonymous]

Arrested for unlawful undressing in a public park in 2019.

Guess her hubs the judge did not have a cuck fetish, huh?

He looks so normal, anyone know him?

https://dailyprogress.com/eedition/page-a01/page_7bd1e3db-5be2-58df-851e-e3d41726953c.html

[Anonymous]

So I found a church bulletin congratulating the Ex on his engagement to another person. This was in 2021 or so. He now seems to have remarried as I think I found his new wife as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So I found a church bulletin congratulating the Ex on his engagement to another person. This was in 2021 or so. He now seems to have remarried as I think I found his new wife as well.

Why? Why did you search for that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously this is not the norm, but often people who are trying to deny an urge or desire that they think is wrong cope by outwardly advocating against it. There are so many examples of religious and conservative men who not only condemn homosexuality or promiscuity, but have actually made it their life’s work to condemn it. Larry Craig, Jerry Falwell jr, robert bauman, George Rekers (my personal favorite story), Roy ashburn, bob Allen, mark foley (remember this guy?), Phillip hinkle, ted haggard, Matt Schlapp. The crazy thing was the ones just wanted a rendezvous with adult men had to build a life of lies to do this. No one should give an F if old man are attracted to 20-30 year old adult men.

I won’t pretend to understand the psychology behind it.

ETA, so maybe that is why this woman signed up for the children advocacy jobs.

Or, she signed up for the same reason that bank robbers rob banks. Because that's where the money is.

[Anonymous]

Guessing she was always mentally ill but family swept under the rug and got her no help, trying to maintain their “status” in Richmond society and her coveted place in St. Catherines. Keeping up appearances and all.

[Anonymous]

Sicko

[Anonymous]

Her dad appears to be alive & still working (or was until recently) according to LinkedIn.

[Anonymous]

Hopefully the ex and a new wife, if there is one, can provide some stability to those kids.

She is homely in photos, was $$$ and the crazy vibe the draw in person?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guessing she was always mentally ill but family swept under the rug and got her no help, trying to maintain their “status” in Richmond society and her coveted place in St. Catherines. Keeping up appearances and all.

I think it is possible they did not know about the cp or her paraphilias.

Although the park incident that precipitated the divorce is pretty out there and everyone knew @ that.

Prob some other relatives who are bipolar or who otherwise avidly chase risks. But even then this is a huge taboo to cross and she seems to have been at it a while given her comfort and the detailed suggestions she shared. Her kids appear to be in the same age vicinity as the girl in the ruse, just beyond horrifying.

[Anonymous]

Women are more likely than men to be the parent or guardian of the victim. The victims of female offenders are often younger than those of male offenders...

https://theconversation.com/what-the-jeffrey-epstein-case-reveals-about-female-sex-offenders-123423

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guessing she was always mentally ill but family swept under the rug and got her no help, trying to maintain their “status” in Richmond society and her coveted place in St. Catherines. Keeping up appearances and all.

I think it is possible they did not know about the cp or her paraphilias.

Although the park incident that precipitated the divorce is pretty out there and everyone knew @ that.

Prob some other relatives who are bipolar or who otherwise avidly chase risks. But even then this is a huge taboo to cross and she seems to have been at it a while given her comfort and the detailed suggestions she shared. Her kids appear to be in the same age vicinity as the girl in the ruse, just beyond horrifying.

At that level of society, it is often about sweeping the family curses under the rug in order to keep up appearances.

[Anonymous]

More from above link

However, the most striking difference is that female offenders are six times more likely than male offenders to have a co-offender. What is co-offending? When two or more people participate in the abuse of the same victim, they are co-offenders. Women may be involved by recruiting and coaxing the victims into dangerous situations and helping to provide a sense of safety for the victims. They may coerce or manipulate the victim, or perpetrate sexually abusive behaviors in front of, or at the same time as, the male abuser. Accusers in the Epstein cases allege that his female co-offenders engaged in all of these forms of abuse. Women co-offend for many reasons. Some may abuse victims for reasons similar to male offenders – for example, to gain power, to retaliate against someone, or due to sexual deviance. However, many are coerced or forced by the male co-offender. Many are threatened or physically abused to force participation. Others participate in exchange for money or drugs. Women who co-offend are different from those who offend alone in many ways. More have traumatic childhoods and strained relationships with parents due to parents being divorced, in prison or abusing drugs or alcohol. They are also more likely to be in a violent relationship with a husband or boyfriend, who is often the co-offender.

Here she was planning to co-offend with a complete stranger, has to be one of the most risky scenarios re: getting caught. Did she just feel THAT untouchable?

I hope she gets a very long sentence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guessing she was always mentally ill but family swept under the rug and got her no help, trying to maintain their “status” in Richmond society and her coveted place in St. Catherines. Keeping up appearances and all.

I think it is possible they did not know about the cp or her paraphilias.

Although the park incident that precipitated the divorce is pretty out there and everyone knew @ that.

Prob some other relatives who are bipolar or who otherwise avidly chase risks. But even then this is a huge taboo to cross and she seems to have been at it a while given her comfort and the detailed suggestions she shared. Her kids appear to be in the same age vicinity as the girl in the ruse, just beyond horrifying.

At that level of society, it is often about sweeping the family curses under the rug in order to keep up appearances.

Hard to keep up appearances after the park incident led the judge to file for divorce and it hit the papers. Just because they ultimately got it dismissed does not mean it did not happen and I'm sure Richmond society took note.