Democrats recently introduced a guaranteed income bill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A UBI supplement of $40k/yr for people earning under $60k would be much better and cheaper.

Well then. Time for me to quit my super stressful GS12 fed job and go back to being a GS7 assistant.
I’ll be making more than my colleagues and doing work that doesn’t require my full brainpower or energy.
That’ll be great for society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would have voted for Yang if he hadn’t dropped out by the time Maryland’s primary rolled around. All the smartest people agree UBI is a good idea.

Incentivizing having more kids to get more money from the government is never a good idea. There’s a lot of data on that.

That kind of depends on what your goal is. Do you want the population of the US to grow? Do you want the economy go grow? Do you want to compete with China or be number two in the world? We need more people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would have voted for Yang if he hadn’t dropped out by the time Maryland’s primary rolled around. All the smartest people agree UBI is a good idea.

Incentivizing having more kids to get more money from the government is never a good idea. There’s a lot of data on that.

That kind of depends on what your goal is. Do you want the population of the US to grow? Do you want the economy go grow? Do you want to compete with China or be number two in the world? We need more people.

Your understanding of economics sucks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would have voted for Yang if he hadn’t dropped out by the time Maryland’s primary rolled around. All the smartest people agree UBI is a good idea.

Incentivizing having more kids to get more money from the government is never a good idea. There’s a lot of data on that.

That kind of depends on what your goal is. Do you want the population of the US to grow? Do you want the economy go grow? Do you want to compete with China or be number two in the world? We need more people.

I’d rather be number 2 or even 39 than have a billion people in this country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A UBI supplement of $40k/yr for people earning under $60k would be much better and cheaper.

Lmao. Watch as millions making $60,001 - 99,999 go quit their jobs on purpose to make $60,000 so that they can get the $40k. Why teach schools when you can be a part time loser barista at a cafe and make more money w a $40k free handout and less stress?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Say hello to hyperinflation, a debased currency, and removal of the dollar as the primary reserve currency. We will be worse than Greece.

LOL, hyperbole much?

[Anonymous]

I'd immediately move to Singapore, Japan, or any other sane country than pay taxes for this socialist idiocy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say hello to hyperinflation, a debased currency, and removal of the dollar as the primary reserve currency. We will be worse than Greece.

LOL, hyperbole much?

Hyperbole? Yeah, because it didn't happen to Venezuela, Greece, Argentina, and a number of other socialist utopias.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would have voted for Yang if he hadn’t dropped out by the time Maryland’s primary rolled around. All the smartest people agree UBI is a good idea.

Incentivizing having more kids to get more money from the government is never a good idea. There’s a lot of data on that.

That kind of depends on what your goal is. Do you want the population of the US to grow? Do you want the economy go grow? Do you want to compete with China or be number two in the world? We need more people.

Your understanding of economics sucks.

How so? If your population declines, so does your GDP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would have voted for Yang if he hadn’t dropped out by the time Maryland’s primary rolled around. All the smartest people agree UBI is a good idea.

Incentivizing having more kids to get more money from the government is never a good idea. There’s a lot of data on that.

That kind of depends on what your goal is. Do you want the population of the US to grow? Do you want the economy go grow? Do you want to compete with China or be number two in the world? We need more people.

Your understanding of economics sucks.

How so? If your population declines, so does your GDP.

SMH

[Anonymous]

What a lot of dummies out there.
More cash and less productivity do not lead to good things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would have voted for Yang if he hadn’t dropped out by the time Maryland’s primary rolled around. All the smartest people agree UBI is a good idea.

Incentivizing having more kids to get more money from the government is never a good idea. There’s a lot of data on that.

That kind of depends on what your goal is. Do you want the population of the US to grow? Do you want the economy go grow? Do you want to compete with China or be number two in the world? We need more people.

Your understanding of economics sucks.

How so? If your population declines, so does your GDP.

SMH

You think a country with a population of 1,000 has the same GDP as one with 1,000,000 has the same as one with 1,000,000,000? SMH some people need to learn more about economics but they think they know it all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say hello to hyperinflation, a debased currency, and removal of the dollar as the primary reserve currency. We will be worse than Greece.

LOL, hyperbole much?

Hyperbole? Yeah, because it didn't happen to Venezuela, Greece, Argentina, and a number of other socialist utopias.

Wait, is that why my drachmae are worthless?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a lot of dummies out there.
More cash and less productivity do not lead to good things.

It’s a Socialist’s wet dream.
Sad what some people in our country believe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would have voted for Yang if he hadn’t dropped out by the time Maryland’s primary rolled around. All the smartest people agree UBI is a good idea.

Incentivizing having more kids to get more money from the government is never a good idea. There’s a lot of data on that.

That kind of depends on what your goal is. Do you want the population of the US to grow? Do you want the economy go grow? Do you want to compete with China or be number two in the world? We need more people.

Your understanding of economics sucks.

How so? If your population declines, so does your GDP.

SMH

You think a country with a population of 1,000 has the same GDP as one with 1,000,000 has the same as one with 1,000,000,000? SMH some people need to learn more about economics but they think they know it all.

The goal higher GDP at such cost is stupid.