NASA: “Water found on moon” || Space Branch needed

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.


Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.


Sure... nasa employee on DCUM. Lolz.
And your grammar, or lack thereof, is another indicator you’re a lying pos

As an ordinary science adventure guy, I can say that the NASA guy is write and also I make misstakes on purpose to PO the grammar NAZIs.


What is this distinction in title? You mean like crocodile wrangling? This is why them and they will try to leave most of the humans behind. It’s over when there are sex robots on the flight to the moon.

No, I mean the NASA guy is correct and you don't need any credentials to see that. Geez.


I got your joke i just wanted to know what adventure you were talking about. Ordinary science guys aren’t alwYs down for the adventure. Just saying. I’d there is some crocodile wrangling occurring with the bobcat hunting, I’m curious about it.

Nevermind.

/s

Oh ok, sorry. Not big into crocodiles and sex robots. More of a space opera kind of guy. I want to watch robots scoop up hydrocarbons on Titan while I have sex with a human.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.


Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.


Sure... nasa employee on DCUM. Lolz.
And your grammar, or lack thereof, is another indicator you’re a lying pos

As an ordinary science adventure guy, I can say that the NASA guy is write and also I make misstakes on purpose to PO the grammar NAZIs.


NP — the NASA poster is obviously brighter, and writes better, than either of you two. Trolls.

Whatever. I blame it on DCUM. I used to write better here. Nobody cared. I get more appropriate responses to bullshit than I get to anything real. Think about that next time you write a trollish response to troll. I do.


I can’t tell if you’re making the point or arguing it; writing the wrong or right. A-

Thanks, I'll take that grade.
Anonymous
NASAguy, I'm afraid you are missing the salient point. How is the water going to attack us? And do we need to be ready tomorrow, or do we have time to sew up some new tracksuits for Space Force?

People have questions.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.


Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.


It’s not about the military doing scientific exploration, rocket scientist. It’s about making sure the scientists are able to explore in the first place. Which will be a little difficult for you nasa folks if the Chinese declare ownership of the moon and we have no way of contesting that.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
NASAguy wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.


Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.


Sure... nasa employee on DCUM. Lolz.
And your grammar, or lack thereof, is another indicator you’re a lying pos


Yes, I am a NASA employee; I've been an employee at Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt for over 28 years, but believe what you want. You can ping Jeff if you want. I've been on DCUM for about 11 years now and I've sent him email from my NASA account. He's verified me on a few threads in the past when people have asked.

Sorry to the grammar police. I'm not that careful about grammar when writing on DCUM.

And for someone trying to police others' posts, you need to clean up your language. You've got an inappropriate temper and language problem.



I have a question.

How was Nixon able to communicate in the 60s with Armstrong and Aldrin via corded landline but I get shitty service on my cellular in almost 2021?

Furthermore, why were the flags waving in outer space?

What leaves me flabbergasted however, is the fact that your colleagues are recorded on audiovisual footage saying “we destroyed the technology by accident to return to the moon”.

Can you please enlighten us as to why we never returned back to our satellite?


Never
A
Straight
Answer
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:NASAguy, I'm afraid you are missing the salient point. How is the water going to attack us? And do we need to be ready tomorrow, or do we have time to sew up some new tracksuits for Space Force?

People have questions.


This is part of the problem. Stupid people making jokes, not even understanding why they’re stupid, and thinking they’re witty. That’s you.


Here’s a little science, so you can make jokes that don’t out you as a moron:

Water can be used as a fuel source. And fuel sources in space are important things.

Water can be electrically separated into its component elements of hydrogen and oxygen, which can then be recombined to produce heat energy, which yields heat, propulsion and electricity, depending on the use of the fuel. All are important things to have in space, for obvious reasons. And the by product of such combustion is ...... water.

So that’s why water on the moon is important. Because it makes going from the moon to other places a lot more feasible than it would be if we had to rely on only on fuels brought from earth.


Now, go forth and dumb no more.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.


Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.


It’s not about the military doing scientific exploration, rocket scientist. It’s about making sure the scientists are able to explore in the first place. Which will be a little difficult for you nasa folks if the Chinese declare ownership of the moon and we have no way of contesting that.



We had that covered with the USAF Space Command. The rebranding event did not add anything.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Dr Buzz endorsed Senator McSally.


Because he respects Warthog drivers with 3 combat tours!

No Warthog driver will ever pay for a drink or their dinner in any place I’m in. I owe my life to CAS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NASAguy, I'm afraid you are missing the salient point. How is the water going to attack us? And do we need to be ready tomorrow, or do we have time to sew up some new tracksuits for Space Force?

People have questions.


This is part of the problem. Stupid people making jokes, not even understanding why they’re stupid, and thinking they’re witty. That’s you.


Here’s a little science, so you can make jokes that don’t out you as a moron:

Water can be used as a fuel source. And fuel sources in space are important things.

Water can be electrically separated into its component elements of hydrogen and oxygen, which can then be recombined to produce heat energy, which yields heat, propulsion and electricity, depending on the use of the fuel. All are important things to have in space, for obvious reasons. And the by product of such combustion is ...... water.

So that’s why water on the moon is important. Because it makes going from the moon to other places a lot more feasible than it would be if we had to rely on only on fuels brought from earth.


Now, go forth and dumb no more.


Dude. I'm not making fun of you or your work -- I'm making light of how the thread started. I'm sorry it came across wrong, but I'm glad for the clarity as to your personality.

I'll avoid responding to you from here out. My apologies.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.


Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.


It’s not about the military doing scientific exploration, rocket scientist. It’s about making sure the scientists are able to explore in the first place. Which will be a little difficult for you nasa folks if the Chinese declare ownership of the moon and we have no way of contesting that.



We had that covered with the USAF Space Command. The rebranding event did not add anything.


Do you even realize that the USAF used to be “The United States Army Air Corps”?

The Army “had it covered”, until 1947.

Missions evolve. It’s time for Space Command to separate from the USAF.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NASAguy, I'm afraid you are missing the salient point. How is the water going to attack us? And do we need to be ready tomorrow, or do we have time to sew up some new tracksuits for Space Force?

People have questions.


This is part of the problem. Stupid people making jokes, not even understanding why they’re stupid, and thinking they’re witty. That’s you.


Here’s a little science, so you can make jokes that don’t out you as a moron:

Water can be used as a fuel source. And fuel sources in space are important things.

Water can be electrically separated into its component elements of hydrogen and oxygen, which can then be recombined to produce heat energy, which yields heat, propulsion and electricity, depending on the use of the fuel. All are important things to have in space, for obvious reasons. And the by product of such combustion is ...... water.

So that’s why water on the moon is important. Because it makes going from the moon to other places a lot more feasible than it would be if we had to rely on only on fuels brought from earth.


Now, go forth and dumb no more.


What’s the backround radiation on the Moon? How long do you think someone could work and stay on the moon with those levels of radiation?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.


Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.


It’s not about the military doing scientific exploration, rocket scientist. It’s about making sure the scientists are able to explore in the first place. Which will be a little difficult for you nasa folks if the Chinese declare ownership of the moon and we have no way of contesting that.


The Chinese are very far from having an effective military presence on the moon, so if they declared ownership, they'd have no way to enforce it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.


Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.


It’s not about the military doing scientific exploration, rocket scientist. It’s about making sure the scientists are able to explore in the first place. Which will be a little difficult for you nasa folks if the Chinese declare ownership of the moon and we have no way of contesting that.


The Chinese are very far from having an effective military presence on the moon, so if they declared ownership, they'd have no way to enforce it.


Lmao humans claiming ownership over a galactic entity. My god thc has definitely gotten potent over the past 4 decades.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.


Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.


It’s not about the military doing scientific exploration, rocket scientist. It’s about making sure the scientists are able to explore in the first place. Which will be a little difficult for you nasa folks if the Chinese declare ownership of the moon and we have no way of contesting that.



We had that covered with the USAF Space Command. The rebranding event did not add anything.


Do you even realize that the USAF used to be “The United States Army Air Corps”?

The Army “had it covered”, until 1947.

Missions evolve. It’s time for Space Command to separate from the USAF.

At the time the Air Force was created, we had already had fought a war in which air power was a decisive factor, had thousands of planes and pilots, could fly anywhere in the world, and we were starting major new research into jet power. As of today no battle has ever been fought in space, no nation has any space-based soldiers and there are no weapons in space.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.


Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.


It’s not about the military doing scientific exploration, rocket scientist. It’s about making sure the scientists are able to explore in the first place. Which will be a little difficult for you nasa folks if the Chinese declare ownership of the moon and we have no way of contesting that.



We had that covered with the USAF Space Command. The rebranding event did not add anything.


Do you even realize that the USAF used to be “The United States Army Air Corps”?

The Army “had it covered”, until 1947.

Missions evolve. It’s time for Space Command to separate from the USAF.


Not the same thing at all. Separating the Air Force mission was warranted. The Space Force is just a rebranding stunt so Trump could pretend that he did something.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: