NASA: “Water found on moon” || Space Branch needed

[Anonymous]

Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Why would we need a new branch of the military to handle water on the moon?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Why would we need a new branch of the military to handle water on the moon?

Cause Aldrin and Neil A. (Anagram for alien spelled backwards - ironic) saw ‘things’ there they were prohibited from talking about.

Whatever other species don’t want humans on the darker side of the moon will have to met with our full power. Additionally, by 2030 we will begin the colonization of Mars.

Surely you don’t want to send a team of emos who claim there are thousands of genders, right?

[Anonymous]

This is not news. We've suspected this water has been there for quite a while. Also they are exagerrating the significance. The water is more than we thought 20 years ago, but in layman's terms, it is in bone dry rocks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Why would we need a new branch of the military to handle water on the moon?

If it is boiling and attacks us, someone could get hurt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Why would we need a new branch of the military to handle water on the moon?

Cause Aldrin and Neil A. (Anagram for alien spelled backwards - ironic) saw ‘things’ there they were prohibited from talking about.

Whatever other species don’t want humans on the darker side of the moon will have to met with our full power. Additionally, by 2030 we will begin the colonization of Mars.

Surely you don’t want to send a team of emos who claim there are thousands of genders, right?

Dude, let me have some of what you're smoking! I need an escape right about now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.

I always wondered why Star Fleet's exploration vessels were so heavily armed. Didn't know it was all Trump's fault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Why would we need a new branch of the military to handle water on the moon?

Cause Aldrin and Neil A. (Anagram for alien spelled backwards - ironic) saw ‘things’ there they were prohibited from talking about.

Whatever other species don’t want humans on the darker side of the moon will have to met with our full power. Additionally, by 2030 we will begin the colonization of Mars.

Surely you don’t want to send a team of emos who claim there are thousands of genders, right?

I feel insane after reading that blather.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.

I always wondered why Star Fleet's exploration vessels were so heavily armed. Didn't know it was all Trump's fault.

We have a long way to go until we get to the utopian Star Trek universe. Stop and look at the world crises in the Star Trek future timeline (especially some episodes in Deep Space Nine) to see what their universe had to survive and overcome before they were able to get to a point where a military expedition would prioritize scientific exploration. We are nowhere near that point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.

I always wondered why Star Fleet's exploration vessels were so heavily armed. Didn't know it was all Trump's fault.

We have a long way to go until we get to the utopian Star Trek universe. Stop and look at the world crises in the Star Trek future timeline (especially some episodes in Deep Space Nine) to see what their universe had to survive and overcome before they were able to get to a point where a military expedition would prioritize scientific exploration. We are nowhere near that point.

I was joking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Why would we need a new branch of the military to handle water on the moon?

If it is boiling and attacks us, someone could get hurt.

Maybe the teeny bits of water have a plan to freeze themselves in deep space, form needle-like ice projections, and pierce our eyeballs.

I would definitely want a Space Branch ready to protect my vision. I already need readers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

Ridiculous. As a NASA employee, I can say that sending a branch of the military to do scientific exploration makes about as much sense as assigning Jared Kushner and a team of corporate execs to handle pandemic response. But then, not surprising, but both ideas came out of the same administration.

I always wondered why Star Fleet's exploration vessels were so heavily armed. Didn't know it was all Trump's fault.

We have a long way to go until we get to the utopian Star Trek universe. Stop and look at the world crises in the Star Trek future timeline (especially some episodes in Deep Space Nine) to see what their universe had to survive and overcome before they were able to get to a point where a military expedition would prioritize scientific exploration. We are nowhere near that point.

I was joking.

I suspected you were, but there are many people who make that argument, who are serious. Most of them don't know that much about ST, but still.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was Trump a visionary or did he have information we peasants could never get access to?

Either way, it seems after all that the new branch will be needed more than ever.

LOL, No. NASA is our scientific space agency. The Space Force is intended to militarize space, so unless we are planning to blow up the moon, the Space Force is irrelevant to this.