| My kid went to a private with no (or almost no) APs. He sat for a few of the tests anyway, got 5s. He went to an Ivy that wouldn't grant credit for them but did let him advance beyond the English 101 level and avoid an intro class. There was no reason in the end to have sat for the others. And it's untrue that you have to report your scores to the colleges. That's optional. His classes were so rigorous that he sailed through the APs with no extra prep. That being said, he told his younger sibling not to bother with them. To save the time and money. On a tour at Yale last year, the admissions officer confirmed that APs only matter if it's the most rigorous course track at your school. Most privates don't weight grades and few kids take the advanced courses they do offer. Those who do are standouts in the subject. It's just a different approach. The schools want to go deep and give teachers more flexibility, not adhere to someone else's curriculum. At public schools, they want to ensure even quality across the board and AP does that. They're not totally worthless. But in the end, unless you're at a school that offers an AP course track or you plan to attend a college that takes AP credits and want to save money or graduate early, it's kind of pointless to worry about it. Equally pointless to worry if you're at a public school that only offers one or two APs. Those kids are not getting compared to kids from McLean or Chevy Chase. |
Narrator: The "fancy private school" kids are still taking 5+ AP exams. The courses are just relabeled. |
and some 3rd party is not making billions on them. |
Good post and largely agreed. But no benefit compared to what? Taking regular courses? It’s hard to know because your student only chose this path. I understand the doubt - I share it - but I just don’t have anything with which to compare it. And at our school the regular classes are filled with less academically ambitious kids (I say that without judgement - I have two of those myself), so the whole point of taking AP classes is being with the driven, ambitious student cohort (and often the better teachers). |
| And once the exam is over, teaching virtually stops. AP’s are not good for education. |
If the kids could do better than top public schools they would want that information published. |
AP Tests are not easy. I don’t put my kids in them for the credit though that’s nice. It’s a way to gauge the rigor of the classes my DD is taking. 100 dollars is a small price to pay for verification of the quality of her school. |
Not a good test of quality of coursework. More an indicator of quantity of info exposed to and recognition of need/willingness to write to a formula. |
BS |
Well, if you have kids in private, I am not sure it's the PP who's been bought. |
|
If I were paying for private, why would I want them to turn all responsibility over to the corrupt College Board?
|
What? |
| I can't believe people have actually bought into the global testing scam that is the APs to the point where they are defending it. Has varsity blues taught you nothing? It is a corrupt system and a lot of colleges are moving away from it on their own, so the private schools are following suit. |
|
http://uvaapplication.blogspot.com/2019/10/course-rigor-and-curriculum-strength.html
There's a whole section about APs in this blog.
|
I like your tinfoil hat, but what would you have public school parents do? AP’s or IB’s are what’s on offer, and if you don’t take a challenging course load you have zero chance of getting into a T20 uni or LAC. So great, it’s corrupt. Do you expect me to just sell my house and move to a non-AP school state? Take regular classes with the burnouts and phone-starers? Okay, you should take off. Time to go lay in some more toilet paper and cheese for your bunker. |