Actually the advice to many parents of children with addiction or severe mental health disorders is to stop enabling it if the child isn’t getting treatment. Love them from afar, but don’t allow them into your house, don’t give them money, don’t let them weave you into your situation because that’s enabling them to keep on their current path vs be forced to address it |
The same could be said of someone with chronic pain or chronic fatigue or any illness that makes people feel miserable most of the time. It is a slippery slope. I think chasing happiness can lead to a grass isn't greener. You leave him only to find that after the excitement of the next guy wears off, it isn't all joy and happiness either. |
|
I think it depends on whether they are trying to help themselves and make things better. If they've pretty much given up and don't seem able to come back, it might be better just to bail. Especially if they are taking it out on you when you try to help.
Obviously there are complicating factors like finances and whether there are kids in the mix. |
This isn’t a fair comparison. We remain loyal to our children because they can neither care for themselves financially and legally, but their brains are not developed enough to manage their own lives. When children act out emotionally, it is rarely to manipulate and usually out of a genuine need they are incapable of meeting on their own. As well, caring for a neurotypical child is a time-limited thing. (And many people do walk away from adult children who cannot manage addiction or mental health issues while being respectful of their family members.) |
Marriage is already disposable. It always has been. At least the wife portion of the marriage has always been disposable. |
I am not saying that it is the same to the person experiencing it. I am saying that it is the same to the other person living with it. But we aren’t talking about anosognosia. We are talking about denial. I am not talking about someone paralyzed from a stroke who thinks there is a dead body in the room because they don’t recognize the legs as their own. And we are not talking about a spouse with Alzheimer’s disease who doesn’t know they have it. We are talking about the addict who refuses to see that he has a problem. Or the diabetic who won’t take his insulin, or the man with chronic migraines who refuses to take medication for it or get therapy on how to handle it, so the whole house has to talk around in silence, or the lady with PTSD who says that it’s not a problem, it’s kusg that sometimes she gets jumpy and starts throwing things. You DO have an obligation to stay with someone who is actively seeking treatment. You do NOT have an obligation to stay with someone who continues to deny there is a problem. And you can say that I don’t understand the person with the mental illness, but I want to counter that many people with mental and physical illnesses get tunnel vision and do not see how their actions affect everyone in the family. |
| I'm in the middle of deciding this right now. My DH has never been diagnosed and never will be, as he refuses to see a therapist or acknowledge that he plays any part in the dreadful experience that is being in our home. In a nutshell, he has not worked in 7 years and we live solely off my income (while his savings continue to accumulate greatly). He moves between two different chairs in the house throughout the day and that's about it. In between, he barely acknowledges that the kids and I are there, but when he does acknowledge our DD or me, it's typically to tell us what horrible people we are. He lashed out at me (just verbally--but really horribly), for honestly no reason, so badly last night that both kids (teenagers) were in tears and begging me to divorce him. I have no money and hate living in this area, so don't even know where to begin in this process. But am I really supposed to stay true to my vows with a man like this? I believe he may be on the spectrum and/or narcissistic personality disorder. |
|
If you have kids, there’s no option - you don’t go down with the ship, you get into the lifeboat. If you’re the only functional parent, then you’re their only parent and you need to make sure that both you and them are safe. And I don’t just mean physically safe.
As for what going down with the ship looks like, I was so stressed out by my ex’s mental illness (including years of unemployment, anger issues, etc.) that I felt like I would get cancer or some other disease. Add to that behaviors that could cause us financial and legal ruin, like drunk driving and secret credit card debt - the ship was going down. |
How nice for you that even though your extended family has dealt with challenges, those challenges have not resulted in a home environment that is unhealthy. How nice for you that partners of those afflicted have not had their own mental health jeopardized/eroded because of those illnesses. How nice for you that they didn't have to divorce in order to provide their children with a stable, healthy home. My XDH refused to accept treatment for his depression. He'd been on medication most of our relationship and, although it could be challenging, I was willing to stay with him because he worked to control. There came a time when he stopped making an effort, refused my assistance, was unemployed for 2 years and was unhealthy to be around - not to mention we were facing financial ruin because of his unemployment and uncontrolled spending. I developed depression myself because of it. It was at that point that I realized living with my XDH was too harmful to me and our kids. I modeled the behavior I hope my kids would emulate in a similar situation. Love isn't enough. Do not jeopardize your well being or the well being of your children by clinging to relationship that is harmful. My XDH is not a bad person. I have no hate/dislike for him. My only regret is that I didn't end the relationship before my well being was so profoundly impacted - and not for the better. Had I remained with him, my kids and I would be suffering as much as he. No vow can require that kind of sacrifice. |
| I thought there was a sickness and health component of the vows. What does a sinking ship really mean? |
If the other person takes deliberate steps to be unmarried, in sickness and in health doesn’t apply. A marriage license in not a suicide pact. |
Do you think everyone here did the Christian vows you are thinking of? |
|
OP: Addiction = Divorce. As does Adultery. As does Abuse.
The 3 A's means that person has already torn-up their spouse card |
| PP again, btw IF they rehabilitate themselves, you're free to marry them again |
I’m so sorry. Do you have family that you can stay with for a little while? |