Lab-Grown Diamond

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a 44 year old white Southern Belle. I can see an F vs a C color diamond from across the room. And don't get me started on occulsions.

Synthetic is better for the Environment and if no sweet child is harmed then it's one million percent better.

Case closed.

I read this in Paula Dean's voice.

I wanted to say a-men at the end of it.

As well you should. Testify!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are real diamonds and literally jewelers can't even tell without running it through a machine to test for carbon. Doubt some snooty moms at your future kid's prep school will be able to tell from across the carpool line. So yes.

No they are not real diamonds. Real diamonds took over 3 billions years to form, under the immense pressure of the earth. That's what makes them so special -- and so valuable. Man made diamonds are not "real" and that's why they are cheap.

Then how come the FTC recently ruled you can't describe lab diamonds as "synthetic," genius?

Who cares what the FTC says. Call it what you want, but in chemistry the energy is part of the equation that equals a diamond and that's not part of the equation of a fake diamond.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are real diamonds and literally jewelers can't even tell without running it through a machine to test for carbon. Doubt some snooty moms at your future kid's prep school will be able to tell from across the carpool line. So yes.

No they are not real diamonds. Real diamonds took over 3 billions years to form, under the immense pressure of the earth. That's what makes them so special -- and so valuable. Man made diamonds are not "real" and that's why they are cheap.

Then how come the FTC recently ruled you can't describe lab diamonds as "synthetic," genius?

Who cares what the FTC says. Call it what you want, but in chemistry the energy is part of the equation that equals a diamond and that's not part of the equation of a fake diamond.

Yeah...the lab growing process involves energy...did you think they just mixed some ingredients together and got a dimaond?...you're an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are real diamonds and literally jewelers can't even tell without running it through a machine to test for carbon. Doubt some snooty moms at your future kid's prep school will be able to tell from across the carpool line. So yes.

No they are not real diamonds. Real diamonds took over 3 billions years to form, under the immense pressure of the earth. That's what makes them so special -- and so valuable. Man made diamonds are not "real" and that's why they are cheap.

Then how come the FTC recently ruled you can't describe lab diamonds as "synthetic," genius?

Who cares what the FTC says. Call it what you want, but in chemistry the energy is part of the equation that equals a diamond and that's not part of the equation of a fake diamond.

Yeah...the lab growing process involves energy...did you think they just mixed some ingredients together and got a dimaond?...you're an idiot.

Not 3.3 billion years' worth of pressure of the weight of the earth. Duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are real diamonds and literally jewelers can't even tell without running it through a machine to test for carbon. Doubt some snooty moms at your future kid's prep school will be able to tell from across the carpool line. So yes.

No they are not real diamonds. Real diamonds took over 3 billions years to form, under the immense pressure of the earth. That's what makes them so special -- and so valuable. Man made diamonds are not "real" and that's why they are cheap.

That + child labor

[Anonymous]

No

[Anonymous]

No, but if that's all your superficial self can afford, you go ahead and do that.

[Anonymous]

Yes!

[Anonymous]

Go to that park in Arkansas and find your own diamond.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are real diamonds and literally jewelers can't even tell without running it through a machine to test for carbon. Doubt some snooty moms at your future kid's prep school will be able to tell from across the carpool line. So yes.

No they are not real diamonds. Real diamonds took over 3 billions years to form, under the immense pressure of the earth. That's what makes them so special -- and so valuable. Man made diamonds are not "real" and that's why they are cheap.

Then how come the FTC recently ruled you can't describe lab diamonds as "synthetic," genius?

In a thread full of ignorance, this is the thing I can’t leave alone. It was a guidance. Not only is that not a “ruling,” it’s not even an administrative rule, so it has no weight at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, but if that's all your superficial self can afford, you go ahead and do that.

Some of y'all are mean. A two carat lab diamond is still going to be $10-15k depending on the other Cs. He ain't cheaping out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are real diamonds and literally jewelers can't even tell without running it through a machine to test for carbon. Doubt some snooty moms at your future kid's prep school will be able to tell from across the carpool line. So yes.

No they are not real diamonds. Real diamonds took over 3 billions years to form, under the immense pressure of the earth. That's what makes them so special -- and so valuable. Man made diamonds are not "real" and that's why they are cheap.

“Real” diamonds are only expensive because DeBeers controls the market.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are real diamonds and literally jewelers can't even tell without running it through a machine to test for carbon. Doubt some snooty moms at your future kid's prep school will be able to tell from across the carpool line. So yes.

No they are not real diamonds. Real diamonds took over 3 billions years to form, under the immense pressure of the earth. That's what makes them so special -- and so valuable. Man made diamonds are not "real" and that's why they are cheap.

“Real” diamonds are only expensive because DeBeers controls the market.

DeBeers hasn’t had an monopoly in almost two decades you fool. Also debeers makes lab diamonds now (Lightbox).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are real diamonds and literally jewelers can't even tell without running it through a machine to test for carbon. Doubt some snooty moms at your future kid's prep school will be able to tell from across the carpool line. So yes.

No they are not real diamonds. Real diamonds took over 3 billions years to form, under the immense pressure of the earth. That's what makes them so special -- and so valuable. Man made diamonds are not "real" and that's why they are cheap.

Then how come the FTC recently ruled you can't describe lab diamonds as "synthetic," genius?

In a thread full of ignorance, this is the thing I can’t leave alone. It was a guidance. Not only is that not a “ruling,” it’s not even an administrative rule, so it has no weight at all.

Omg get a grip bruh u an actual gemologist or some mess?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are real diamonds and literally jewelers can't even tell without running it through a machine to test for carbon. Doubt some snooty moms at your future kid's prep school will be able to tell from across the carpool line. So yes.

No they are not real diamonds. Real diamonds took over 3 billions years to form, under the immense pressure of the earth. That's what makes them so special -- and so valuable. Man made diamonds are not "real" and that's why they are cheap.

“Real” diamonds are only expensive because DeBeers controls the market.

DeBeers hasn’t had an monopoly in almost two decades you fool. Also debeers makes lab diamonds now (Lightbox).

Okay so DeBeers makes it. So then it's fine.