Lisa Page and Bruce Ohr's interview transcript

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa%20Page%20interview%20Day%201.pdf

https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Ohr%20Interview%20Transcript%208.28.18.pdf


Interestingly it may be Lisa Page who pushed to open the investigation on Trump after Comey was fired. (Lisa Page: "And we need to open the case we have been waiting on while Andy is acting")

And Peter Strozk was still a section chief when they discussed the "insurance policy" in August of 2016. McCabe probably promoted Strozk because of his work on Russia/HRC investigation.

DoJ counter intel section chief insisted Cheryl Mills be included in HRC interview despite the opposition from the FBI.

Fascinating read if you are a political junky.

https://dougcollins.house.gov/page

Day 2, Lisa Page
https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa%20Page%20interview%20Day%202.pdf

One interesting nugget -- the Russia investigation was opened on July 31 2016. Lisa Page already expressed doubts about their confidential source (redacted) and their assumptions on August 13. There was a briefing with the White House on August 8. Brennan briefed Harry Reid on August 25.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa%20Page%20interview%20Day%201.pdf

https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Ohr%20Interview%20Transcript%208.28.18.pdf


Interestingly it may be Lisa Page who pushed to open the investigation on Trump after Comey was fired. (Lisa Page: "And we need to open the case we have been waiting on while Andy is acting")

And Peter Strozk was still a section chief when they discussed the "insurance policy" in August of 2016. McCabe probably promoted Strozk because of his work on Russia/HRC investigation.

DoJ counter intel section chief insisted Cheryl Mills be included in HRC interview despite the opposition from the FBI.

Fascinating read if you are a political junky.

https://dougcollins.house.gov/page

Day 2, Lisa Page
https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa%20Page%20interview%20Day%202.pdf

One interesting nugget -- the Russia investigation was opened on July 31 2016. Lisa Page already expressed doubts about their confidential source (redacted) and their assumptions on August 13. There was a briefing with the White House on August 8. Brennan briefed Harry Reid on August 25.

Thank you. There's some "gross negligence" discussion on page 34 and going forward.

[Anonymous]

Page said straight up that the DOJ (under Loretta Lynch at the time) told them not to prosecute Clinton

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Page said straight up that the DOJ (under Loretta Lynch at the time) told them not to prosecute Clinton

Loretta Lynch had the power to decide--the FBI did not. DOJ gets to decide who to prosecute. Lynch should have recused herself and she did not. And, for those blaming Comey, you can switch your blame to WJC. His meeting with Lynch on the tarmac resulted in Comey's little speech. Otherwise, Lynch would have decided not to prosecute and we would never have heard how egregious HRC's violations were.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Page said straight up that the DOJ (under Loretta Lynch at the time) told them not to prosecute Clinton

Loretta Lynch had the power to decide--the FBI did not. DOJ gets to decide who to prosecute. Lynch should have recused herself and she did not. And, for those blaming Comey, you can switch your blame to WJC. His meeting with Lynch on the tarmac resulted in Comey's little speech. Otherwise, Lynch would have decided not to prosecute and we would never have heard how egregious HRC's violations were.

PP here--and, because of the meeting on the tarmac, Lynch kept saying she would take the FBI recommendation--and, Comey took the ball and ran.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Page said straight up that the DOJ (under Loretta Lynch at the time) told them not to prosecute Clinton

Loretta Lynch had the power to decide--the FBI did not. DOJ gets to decide who to prosecute. Lynch should have recused herself and she did not. And, for those blaming Comey, you can switch your blame to WJC. His meeting with Lynch on the tarmac resulted in Comey's little speech. Otherwise, Lynch would have decided not to prosecute and we would never have heard how egregious HRC's violations were.

Comey should have recused as well given his brother's association with the Clintons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Page said straight up that the DOJ (under Loretta Lynch at the time) told them not to prosecute Clinton

Loretta Lynch had the power to decide--the FBI did not. DOJ gets to decide who to prosecute. Lynch should have recused herself and she did not. And, for those blaming Comey, you can switch your blame to WJC. His meeting with Lynch on the tarmac resulted in Comey's little speech. Otherwise, Lynch would have decided not to prosecute and we would never have heard how egregious HRC's violations were.

PP here--and, because of the meeting on the tarmac, Lynch kept saying she would take the FBI recommendation--and, Comey took the ball and ran.

It wasn't his place. It should have fallen to the deputed AG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Page said straight up that the DOJ (under Loretta Lynch at the time) told them not to prosecute Clinton

Loretta Lynch had the power to decide--the FBI did not. DOJ gets to decide who to prosecute. Lynch should have recused herself and she did not. And, for those blaming Comey, you can switch your blame to WJC. His meeting with Lynch on the tarmac resulted in Comey's little speech. Otherwise, Lynch would have decided not to prosecute and we would never have heard how egregious HRC's violations were.

Comey should have recused as well given his brother's association with the Clintons.

What is his brother’s association with the Clintons?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Page said straight up that the DOJ (under Loretta Lynch at the time) told them not to prosecute Clinton

Loretta Lynch had the power to decide--the FBI did not. DOJ gets to decide who to prosecute. Lynch should have recused herself and she did not. And, for those blaming Comey, you can switch your blame to WJC. His meeting with Lynch on the tarmac resulted in Comey's little speech. Otherwise, Lynch would have decided not to prosecute and we would never have heard how egregious HRC's violations were.

PP here--and, because of the meeting on the tarmac, Lynch kept saying she would take the FBI recommendation--and, Comey took the ball and ran.

It wasn't his place. It should have fallen to the deputed AG.

Lynch didn't recuse herself. You are incorrect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Page said straight up that the DOJ (under Loretta Lynch at the time) told them not to prosecute Clinton

Loretta Lynch had the power to decide--the FBI did not. DOJ gets to decide who to prosecute. Lynch should have recused herself and she did not. And, for those blaming Comey, you can switch your blame to WJC. His meeting with Lynch on the tarmac resulted in Comey's little speech. Otherwise, Lynch would have decided not to prosecute and we would never have heard how egregious HRC's violations were.

Comey should have recused as well given his brother's association with the Clintons.

What is his brother’s association with the Clintons?

Now it so happens that James Comey has a brother, Peter Comey, who had an executive position with the Washington law firm that did the audit of the Clinton foundation in 2015. Peter Comey was officially DLA Piper “Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas,” in 2015 when the Clinton Foundation scandals first broke and Hillary was preparing her Presidential campaign. Not only was DLA Piper, the firm where Comey’s brother worked, involved in the audit of the Clinton Foundation. According to the foundation’s donor records, DLA Piper has given between $50,000 and $100,000 to the foundation.

There are other “coincidences” such as James Comey’s role before becoming FBI head as Vice President for top defense contractor Lockheed Martin, which became a corporate donor to the Clinton Foundation.

Peter Comey, working for the law firm that did the audit of the Clinton Foundation, at the time his brother headed the FBI and led the whitewash of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton matters a heck of a lot. Even the mere hint of such conflict of interest ought to have led to FBI director Comey recusing himself from any contact with the 2016 Clinton email server investigation.

https://journal-neo.org/2018/12/10/who-is-peter-comey-and-why-it-matters/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa%20Page%20interview%20Day%201.pdf

https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Ohr%20Interview%20Transcript%208.28.18.pdf


Interestingly it may be Lisa Page who pushed to open the investigation on Trump after Comey was fired. (Lisa Page: "And we need to open the case we have been waiting on while Andy is acting")

And Peter Strozk was still a section chief when they discussed the "insurance policy" in August of 2016. McCabe probably promoted Strozk because of his work on Russia/HRC investigation.

DoJ counter intel section chief insisted Cheryl Mills be included in HRC interview despite the opposition from the FBI.

Fascinating read if you are a political junky.

https://dougcollins.house.gov/page

Day 2, Lisa Page
https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa%20Page%20interview%20Day%202.pdf

One interesting nugget -- the Russia investigation was opened on July 31 2016. Lisa Page already expressed doubts about their confidential source (redacted) and their assumptions on August 13. There was a briefing with the White House on August 8. Brennan briefed Harry Reid on August 25.

Thank you. There's some "gross negligence" discussion on page 34 and going forward.

Peter Strzok's interview is released.

https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/06.27.18%20Interview%20Of%20Peter%20Strzok.pdf

[Anonymous]

Remember, the DOJ indicated that HRC would not be prosecuted before the investigation was complete.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember, the DOJ indicated that HRC would not be prosecuted before the investigation was complete.

There was nothing there. There was never anything there.

[Anonymous]

The House investigation under the GOP yielded nothing.

The DOJ can investigate this at any time.

And for the people upset about the tarmac meeting, I assume you are equally upset about the Whitaker-Trump interactions?

[Anonymous]

More validation of the Steel dossier

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/14/us/politics/gubarev-steele-dossier-trump-russia.html