I think OP's take is interesting. If it make sense for her, sure!
My theory on kids and why I stopped at two is that I get more of the fun with two and not three. The way I see it, you have to spend a certain amount of time taking care of kids' basic needs: keeping kids fed, dressed, cleanly diapered (if you're still in that stage), safe. Then you have a little time for fun stuff. I realized that having three meant much more time taking care of basic needs and less time having fun with them. In the thick of things with my two, I realized if if the kid was happy and content, I wasn't with her. I was with the other one who was crying or hungry or needing his nose wiped. Then I switched. If I had more, there would be more time dealing with the least happy one, and less time for fun. Just my take on things. |
If you actually spent *years* at a 1 pre-kids, that would mean you were severely clinically depressed. |
^^ sugarcoated lies. having a kid (especially for a woman) is a MASSIVE change in your life, in terms of your freedom and time. yes I adore my child and feel intense love for him, but don't be fooled into thinking having a kid is just like being childless, except with a cute fun new person! it's not. it's a huge change in status, entry into a total institution. |
Meh. So each kid gives you the potential for higher highs and lower lows? No one can be as happy as a person with more and more kids? Seems like a fallacy to me. |
I dunno for me PP is pretty spot on. We're all different, we all experience this world differently. |
I only have one kid, and I hover between 0 and -10 ALOT. There are a few really happy moments, but they are way too few and far between for me to consider more. |
Love this post! I think people are misinterpreting when they say this means more kids = more happiness. I think what OP is saying is that the lows get lower and potential highs get higher. But it doesn't mean that your average state of happiness is lower or higher - I think that is dependent on each individual person and situation. |
Agreed. I found the post very odd. I am definitely happier both on a regular basis and experience higher highs than my SIL who has twice the amount of kids I do. I also have a friend who has one and is the kind of person who radiates joy. So I don't think this makes any sense at all. |
Uh, those two things are the same. She's saying if you only have one kid, you can't possibly be as happy on your happiest day as the happiest day of someone who has more kids. |
I think people are reading into this too much. It is just like...intensity maybe is a better term? A lot of people say fighting with a spouse gets you to a really intense emotional level. And then you have crazy sex and you're just like, FEELING IT. But it doesn't mean they LOVE their spouse more than I love my spouse I don't fight that way with. But that they enjoy and are fulfilled by an intense reaction that I am not fueled by. Every child adds intensity, and therefore high highs, low lows. But you don't love your one child less than I love my two children. You just aren't fulfilled by the intensity of those high highs/low lows that come with added children and their corresponding drama. I do think at some point this tapers off though, like after 8 kids or something, I don't think you can really have the same kind of significant meaningful one on one relationships with 8 kids plus DH. My grammy had 8 children (Catholic, not on purpose). And she loved them all for sure. But as adults they are all SO competitive with one another still, scrabbling for affection. I think its just a matter of bandwidth at some point. But for sure up to whatever that line is, the intensity is ratcheted up with every successive kid. |
The actual research indicates that parenting negatively impacts well-being on average. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159916/ "it turns out that having a child can have a pretty strong negative impact on a person's happiness, according to a new study published in the journal Demography. In fact, on average, the effect of a new baby on a person's life in the first year is devastatingly bad — worse than divorce, worse than unemployment and worse even than the death of a partner." https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2015/08/11/the-most-depressing-statistic-imaginable-about-being-a-new-parent/?utm_term=.3c37e87f87af |
Maybe on average, but that doesn't mean I'm lying when i say having a child didnt remotely negatively impact my life or fundamentally alter my identity. I'm not the pp of this thread but i feel it's really reflective of my experience, too. |
this is, obviously, nonsense. it's the researchers who need to go back to the drawing board and find a better tool for measurement. |
i don't think OP is guaranteeing anyone additional everyday happiness. I like running, and have run a few 10k's and the highs are great plus the lows are manageable for me. But while i know the high of running a marathon would be amazing, the lows would be too much for me, and would make it not worth it-for me, anyway. I also absolutely know i want to stop at two kids, because the lows involved are just as deep as i can handle. i will probably miss out on some 'big family' joy that can only come with 3+, but will also miss out on the 'big family' lows. Overall, average happiness probably has more to do individual personality, money, family, and friends than anything else. |
Not sure how you came to this conclusion. Here are many reasons why women suffer after having kids. Some of us are luckier than others and can throw money at some of these problems. 1. Ruins or stalls your careeer 2. Messes up your body 3. Fewer nights out with friends and husband 4. Breastfeeding and childbirth hurt 5. SLEEP 6. Sex life with your husband I could go on. Having kids sucks. It’s why birth control was a big deal. Few women want kid after kid unless they have nothing to give up in their life for that next child. |