We have gone off the deep end if we need insurance to host a two person playdate at a home. And even thinking about it in legalistic terms I'm not sure how the Nanny's liability is any different if a guest gets injured instead of her legal charge. |
These are NOT playdates. There is a difference between a playdates and these extras that keep popping up. |
OP, the problem is that this mom now expects your nanny to pick up her kids. What if your kid is sick and isn't in school one day? Will she expect your nanny to put your kick in the car and go get her kids? And what if your kid has a doctor's appointment, or another play date, or anything else? Your nanny works for you, as you are the only one paying her (and I'm not saying that like you own the nanny - I have one and don't remotely think I own her - I say that as in you ought to protect her in this situation by saying something to the mom). The other mom definitely needs to pay for this, but first, you and the nanny need to decide that it's what you want to do. Where does the extra car/booster seat come from? What happens if the other kid is sick? I feel like this is a slippery slope kind of thing and your nanny is going to be even more taken advantage of as time goes on and then it will be even more awkward. |
OP I had this exact situation last year with my au pair and the mom of a classmate. She kept calling my au pair to arrange playdates that included picking her child up from school and spending the entire afternoon with her when the mom had to work a part time job. She never invited my child to play at their house.
Finally, I called the mom and said all playdates needed to be organized through me -- not directly through the au pair. I thought that would help; it did not. She still texted my au pair. I told her she needed to pay her if she expected her to watch her child. She blew up at me and said that in her country (which she left more than 10 years ago) moms helped each other out. I said that may be true, but I see the helping going only one way and not the other. Needless to say she didn't speak to me again, but my poor au pair was relieved. |
Let's face it, when you bring up $$ to the other mother, all hell is going to break loose. She will not want to pay, Kids friendship will probably be over or very curtailed.
I would start scheduling my child for a few additional activities or have nanny run an errand so the nanny would not be available for the other child. Why would other parent be willing to have a stranger drive her child around? Insurance liability for the nanny. |
One more question:
Do you have a second car seat / booster this girl is using? My biggest concern is Nanny being taken advantage and liability. Driving children is a lot of liability should there be an accident. If you have the minimum car insurance, immediately get more. Step 1: Talk to your Nanny Step 2: Agree on reasonable boundaries - compensation. Step 3: Approach other Mom via phone Step 4: Ensure plan has been implemented |
People are incredible! |
+1 The other mom is a moocher and OP needs to come up with a pay arrangement. Otherwise the nanny is going to resentful sooner or later. |
Not at all irrelevant if the nanny has extra time and could potentially be paid by the other family. Win win for OP. |
The issue has never been nanny bandwidth it's nanny being taken advantage of by not being compensated. Pp is just trying to make op feel guilty like this is nbd |
I don't know the right answer for this, but I think it definitely needs to be addressed. It's one thing if you are carpooling and taking responsibility for the safety of another child both while driving them and while having them in your home...it's another if it's your employee. No one wants to think about those what-ifs, but car accidents and play accidents happen. And these don't sound like close friends with an established relationship where you might be able to navigate something like that.
Personally, I wouldn't like to have my childcare provider caring for another child on a regular basis since it limits our flexibility. But I can see others feeling differently. Nonetheless, we have insurance and a contract with our nanny which also spells out some of these things...it's advisable to have something similar for this other child as well. |
This |
The difference is that the parents of the legal charge have an existing relationship with the nanny and probably some sort of contract with her as well that spells out how things would be handled. Personally, my biggest concern would be the driving part more than the at-home part. Car accidents happen. I personally would feel uncomfortable myself driving the kid of someone I didn't know well let alone having my nanny drive them...though that just might be me. People are litigious, and you just never know... |
My biggest issue with this situation is that she’s contacting the nanny directly and not OP. Seems underhanded. |
If you ask for money from the other parent, that gives her some power over YOUR nanny. What if she wants to add another activity or another one of her kids to the mix? This parent is taking advantage of you and your nanny. Keep the control.
I am the PP who said don't confront. Add some activities/errands that "prevent" your nanny from being the scheduled driver. Moocher mom will find somebody else. |