Mundo Verde v. LAMB

[Anonymous]

The fact that the LAMB board stepped in and handled and removed the administration gives me more confidence. The MV has yet to demonstrate any interest in conducting oversight of the administration and the school's adherence to its mission and charter. But, I guess the grass is always greener....

[Anonymous]

Which one is the easier commute for you? Assuming you get in at PK3, that is 8 years of driving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the LAMB board stepped in and handled and removed the administration gives me more confidence. The MV has yet to demonstrate any interest in conducting oversight of the administration and the school's adherence to its mission and charter. But, I guess the grass is always greener....

How is the school not living up to its mission and charter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Which one is the easier commute for you? Assuming you get in at PK3, that is 8 years of driving.

We have many children, none in PK3.

Mundo would be the easier commute since Lamb is moving or not moving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the LAMB board stepped in and handled and removed the administration gives me more confidence. The MV has yet to demonstrate any interest in conducting oversight of the administration and the school's adherence to its mission and charter. But, I guess the grass is always greener....

If you knew how the Board protected Fernandez you would lose that confidence very quickly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the LAMB board stepped in and handled and removed the administration gives me more confidence. The MV has yet to demonstrate any interest in conducting oversight of the administration and the school's adherence to its mission and charter. But, I guess the grass is always greener....

If you knew how the Board protected Fernandez you would lose that confidence very quickly.

Look, there is a lot of BS on this site, and plenty[i][b] to fault the LAMB board for, but NO evidence they knew about Fernandez. The continued reports were kept from them as far as anyone has ever acknowledged. Do you have other info?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the LAMB board stepped in and handled and removed the administration gives me more confidence. The MV has yet to demonstrate any interest in conducting oversight of the administration and the school's adherence to its mission and charter. But, I guess the grass is always greener....

(


If you knew how the Board protected Fernandez you would lose that confidence very quickly.

Look, there is a lot of BS on this site, and plenty[i][b] to fault the LAMB board for, but NO evidence they knew about Fernandez. The continued reports were kept from them as far as anyone has ever acknowledged. Do you have other info?

From talking to parents at LAMB it seemed like there Board was out to lunch and only removed key leadership after extreme pressure was applied. Maybe now they will more active going forward. I agree MV Board is MIA so not sure either school is great on that front. Honestly if you want active oversight of school leadership, you need a public school where there is a central office and bureaucracy (which of course has its own downsides).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the LAMB board stepped in and handled and removed the administration gives me more confidence. The MV has yet to demonstrate any interest in conducting oversight of the administration and the school's adherence to its mission and charter. But, I guess the grass is always greener....

If you knew how the Board protected Fernandez you would lose that confidence very quickly.

Look, there is a lot of BS on this site, and plenty[i][b] to fault the LAMB board for, but NO evidence they knew about Fernandez. The continued reports were kept from them as far as anyone has ever acknowledged. Do you have other info?

Yes. But it may not have been the whole board.

[Anonymous]

LAMB has nothing in place to prevent a pedophile from preying on kids again. There is no leadership there.

I'm shocked and disgusted how many parents would consider LAMB in any capacity. it wasn't that it happened once and he was removed immediately.

Its no different than what happened at Penn State except DC residents get to pay for the lawsuits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LAMB has nothing in place to prevent a pedophile from preying on kids again. There is no leadership there.

I'm shocked and disgusted how many parents would consider LAMB in any capacity. it wasn't that it happened once and he was removed immediately.

Its no different than what happened at Penn State except DC residents get to pay for the lawsuits.

Not really. DC residents paid for LAMB's insurance policy, which will pay for the lawsuits.

[Anonymous]

And not like penn state because once it was public it ended - LAMB it is now public and the school has done nothing to make sure it stays stopped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And not like penn state because once it was public it ended - LAMB it is now public and the school has done nothing to make sure it stays stopped.

At the risk of feeding the trolls...what exactly would you want to happen that hasn't happened? Because saying nothing has been done simply isn't true.

[Anonymous]

I revived this post because we need to make a choice between lamb and mundo. As current lamb parents I know what safeguards are in place to make sure this doesn’t happen again and am comfortable with that. I haven’t actually asked Mundo that question, so thanks for bringing that up. Other than that i don’t care to discuss lanb’s current lawsuits.

My concerns relate to academics. I’ve heard from many parents that Mundo could be stronger. Is this accurate?

[Anonymous]

If you really want to know about MV, ask some pointed questions about exactly how expeditionary learning is being conducted. How student led is the learning, how much field work are they doing (and I don't count someone coming to the class an lecturing as field work). How many field trips are there in various grades? To where? When school was in MtP students were going to Rock Creek weekly for field work. My 3rd and 4th graders have not been out in nature all year this year, nor last year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you really want to know about MV, ask some pointed questions about exactly how expeditionary learning is being conducted. How student led is the learning, how much field work are they doing (and I don't count someone coming to the class an lecturing as field work). How many field trips are there in various grades? To where? When school was in MtP students were going to Rock Creek weekly for field work. My 3rd and 4th graders have not been out in nature all year this year, nor last year.

The school has cut back dramatically on expeditionary learning. The majority of time is spent helping below grade average students in math and reading.