Comet Ping Pong shooter being offered plea deal

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

Podesta is a weird dude , no telling what's there if you kick that rock over. That's just one reason they are going for a plea which on the surface would make no sense. You never know what might come out of discovery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

Podesta is a weird dude , no telling what's there if you kick that rock over. That's just one reason they are going for a plea which on the surface would make no sense. You never know what might come out of discovery.

NP. They almost always plea out. This is the norm. It's a more efficient use of limited government resources. Also, no one was ultimately hurt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

Podesta is a weird dude , no telling what's there if you kick that rock over. That's just one reason they are going for a plea which on the surface would make no sense. You never know what might come out of discovery.

Please stop. You are part of the problem. YOU are a reason why this lunatic came up all the way from NC to "free" the children. Stop spreading the lies.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?

In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.

Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

Podesta is a weird dude , no telling what's there if you kick that rock over. That's just one reason they are going for a plea which on the surface would make no sense. You never know what might come out of discovery.

I think what you describe is one of the dangers of a plea agreement. It allows people to make this sort of assumption that contributes to the false narrative. While I am not a lawyer, I am skeptical that very much discovery into Podesta's private matters would be allowed. Clearly there is no child sex ring being run out of Comet and whatever belief Welch had that there was could not have been influenced by any private information. Going on a fishing expedition is not going to change the fact that he criminally discharged a weapon inside Comet Ping Pong or committed the other offenses with which he is charged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?

In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.

Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?

WOW the stupidity never ceases to amaze. It is important for many reasons. Some of them are that a lie took off like wild fire which resulted in a guy driving up from NC to seek vengeance. It is even more important considering fake news are so prevelnt these days that it got a lunatic into the White House in November. Truth matters, facts matter! This was not a random crime.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?

In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.

Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?

Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?

In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.

Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?

Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?

What's your evidence to say I'm "trying to excuse his actions"? From my posts it's pretty obvious that I am not.

Now, I do notice some biased partisan hate, or exactly the same type the gunman brought to bear.

You both seem to inhabite very isolated bubbles, which is quite sad, and the very problem we are facing.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?

In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.

Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?

Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?

What's your evidence to say I'm "trying to excuse his actions"? From my posts it's pretty obvious that I am not.

Now, I do notice some biased partisan hate, or exactly the same type the gunman brought to bear.

You both seem to inhabite very isolated bubbles, which is quite sad, and the very problem we are facing.

My evidence that you are trying to excuse his actions is that you are arguing that he should not be called a "shooter" (i.e. you are excusing that he shot his gun) and that you asked "What is the crime" as if you are unaware of the multiple felonies with which Welch has been charged or don't consider those felonies to be crimes.

You suffer from a very bad case of transference. Any partisan hate is entirely on your part, demonstrated by your inability to call a shooter a shooter or even recognize a crime. Similarly, the only isolated bubble in evidence is the one in which you inhabit and in which merely stating facts is considered a partisan action.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?

In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.

Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?

Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?

What's your evidence to say I'm "trying to excuse his actions"? From my posts it's pretty obvious that I am not.

Now, I do notice some biased partisan hate, or exactly the same type the gunman brought to bear.

You both seem to inhabite very isolated bubbles, which is quite sad, and the very problem we are facing.

My evidence that you are trying to excuse his actions is that you are arguing that he should not be called a "shooter" (i.e. you are excusing that he shot his gun) and that you asked "What is the crime" as if you are unaware of the multiple felonies with which Welch has been charged or don't consider those felonies to be crimes.

You suffer from a very bad case of transference. Any partisan hate is entirely on your part, demonstrated by your inability to call a shooter a shooter or even recognize a crime. Similarly, the only isolated bubble in evidence is the one in which you inhabit and in which merely stating facts is considered a partisan action.

Since you just blocked my separate thread, let me post here.

Some crazy activists met in December to discuss how to throw acid at Trump supporters during Inauguration Day.

And, guess where they met?

Comet Ping Pong.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety...2Fstory&utm_term=.63c46dbb1f30

You'll agree with me that their crime is exponentially worse than the deranged gunman, correct?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?

In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.

Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?

Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?

What's your evidence to say I'm "trying to excuse his actions"? From my posts it's pretty obvious that I am not.

Now, I do notice some biased partisan hate, or exactly the same type the gunman brought to bear.

You both seem to inhabite very isolated bubbles, which is quite sad, and the very problem we are facing.

My evidence that you are trying to excuse his actions is that you are arguing that he should not be called a "shooter" (i.e. you are excusing that he shot his gun) and that you asked "What is the crime" as if you are unaware of the multiple felonies with which Welch has been charged or don't consider those felonies to be crimes.

You suffer from a very bad case of transference. Any partisan hate is entirely on your part, demonstrated by your inability to call a shooter a shooter or even recognize a crime. Similarly, the only isolated bubble in evidence is the one in which you inhabit and in which merely stating facts is considered a partisan action.

Since you just blocked my separate thread, let me post here.

Some crazy activists met in December to discuss how to throw acid at Trump supporters during Inauguration Day.

And, guess where they met?

Comet Ping Pong.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety...2Fstory&utm_term=.63c46dbb1f30

You'll agree with me that their crime is exponentially worse than the deranged gunman, correct?

Their "plot" was to spread -- not throw -- butyric acid, which is really stinky. They wanted to stink out the ball-goers. And then they decided not to do it. They now claim they knew they had been infiltrated and were just having a joke on the infiltrator.

The deranged gunman actually fired a gun in a crowded restaurant. So you're saying it's "exponentially worse" to talk about doing something and not do it, than to actually endanger other people? You've slipped beyond alternate facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.

He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .

The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?

What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?

In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.

Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?

Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?

What's your evidence to say I'm "trying to excuse his actions"? From my posts it's pretty obvious that I am not.

Now, I do notice some biased partisan hate, or exactly the same type the gunman brought to bear.

You both seem to inhabite very isolated bubbles, which is quite sad, and the very problem we are facing.

My evidence that you are trying to excuse his actions is that you are arguing that he should not be called a "shooter" (i.e. you are excusing that he shot his gun) and that you asked "What is the crime" as if you are unaware of the multiple felonies with which Welch has been charged or don't consider those felonies to be crimes.

You suffer from a very bad case of transference. Any partisan hate is entirely on your part, demonstrated by your inability to call a shooter a shooter or even recognize a crime. Similarly, the only isolated bubble in evidence is the one in which you inhabit and in which merely stating facts is considered a partisan action.

Since you just blocked my separate thread, let me post here.

Some crazy activists met in December to discuss how to throw acid at Trump supporters during Inauguration Day.

And, guess where they met?

Comet Ping Pong.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety...2Fstory&utm_term=.63c46dbb1f30

You'll agree with me that their crime is exponentially worse than the deranged gunman, correct?

Their "plot" was to spread -- not throw -- butyric acid, which is really stinky. They wanted to stink out the ball-goers. And then they decided not to do it. They now claim they knew they had been infiltrated and were just having a joke on the infiltrator.

The deranged gunman actually fired a gun in a crowded restaurant. So you're saying it's "exponentially worse" to talk about doing something and not do it, than to actually endanger other people? You've slipped beyond alternate facts.

Any decent human being would understand that it is a worse crime to conspire to physically harm political opponents than to investigate and liberate (supposedly) some kids.

Thank God your candidate lost the election.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:
Any decent human being would understand that it is a worse crime to conspire to physically harm political opponents than to investigate and liberate (supposedly) some kids.

Thank God your candidate lost the election.

Clearly reading is not a skill that you have mastered given that you didn't join the duplicate thread in the Politics Forum as I suggested when I locked your thread and have instead hijacked this one. Moreover, as simple reading comprehension would clarify, those filmed meeting at Comet did not conspire to physically harm anyone. Moreover, I disagree that a conspiracy that is not carried out is worse than a action that is actually carried out.

[Anonymous]

The deranged poster on this thread trying to justify unjustifiable facts, just like Trump, should probably go to bed. As we all should, because there's no reasoning with people like that. NP here. Just saying.