Payne elementary

[Anonymous]

No, schools don't turn around quickly -that's pie in the sky thinking. It took Brent a decade to become majority in-boundary and Maury still doesn't have lots of high SES kids in the upper grades. Ludlow-Taylor actually lost most of its in-boundary families under Principal Cobbs, who stuck around for seven long years. I see a few gentrifiers toughing things out at Payne in K in the fall, and maybe 1st grade the year after, with few (or no) high SES families in the upper grades for another eight or nine years. Can you wait that long, OP?

[Anonymous]

Huh? I think most would be happy if Payne were comparable to Maury or Ludlow-Taylor. Why are you throwing stones at them?

Times are different now with the lack of OOB seats on the hill. What hasn't played out yet is whether the number of families using the traditionally shunned schools will translate into additional hill schools making the DCUM acceptable list

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, schools don't turn around quickly -that's pie in the sky thinking. It took Brent a decade to become majority in-boundary and Maury still doesn't have lots of high SES kids in the upper grades. Ludlow-Taylor actually lost most of its in-boundary families under Principal Cobbs, who stuck around for seven long years. I see a few gentrifiers toughing things out at Payne in K in the fall, and maybe 1st grade the year after, with few (or no) high SES families in the upper grades for another eight or nine years. Can you wait that long, OP?

I seriously doubt it will take 10 years. Why? Because there aren't enough charter seats available, and not enough affordable inventory in the areas in which former Hill residents like to purchase.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, schools don't turn around quickly -that's pie in the sky thinking. It took Brent a decade to become majority in-boundary and Maury still doesn't have lots of high SES kids in the upper grades. Ludlow-Taylor actually lost most of its in-boundary families under Principal Cobbs, who stuck around for seven long years. I see a few gentrifiers toughing things out at Payne in K in the fall, and maybe 1st grade the year after, with few (or no) high SES families in the upper grades for another eight or nine years. Can you wait that long, OP?

I seriously doubt it will take 10 years. Why? Because there aren't enough charter seats available, and not enough affordable inventory in the areas in which former Hill residents like to purchase.

It has taken longer than that to turn around Garrison around. there will always be plenty of inventory in the 'burbs...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, schools don't turn around quickly -that's pie in the sky thinking. It took Brent a decade to become majority in-boundary and Maury still doesn't have lots of high SES kids in the upper grades. Ludlow-Taylor actually lost most of its in-boundary families under Principal Cobbs, who stuck around for seven long years. I see a few gentrifiers toughing things out at Payne in K in the fall, and maybe 1st grade the year after, with few (or no) high SES families in the upper grades for another eight or nine years. Can you wait that long, OP?

I seriously doubt it will take 10 years. Why? Because there aren't enough charter seats available, and not enough affordable inventory in the areas in which former Hill residents like to purchase.

It has taken longer than that to turn around Garrison around. there will always be plenty of inventory in the 'burbs...

+100. I find that relative newcomers to the city, and parents of toddlers who haven't been involved in DCPS schools yet, tend to dramatically underestimate what it takes to make a school gentrifier friendly past the early childhood years.

There are boatloads of charter seats available, just not at schools that aren't majority FARMs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, schools don't turn around quickly -that's pie in the sky thinking. It took Brent a decade to become majority in-boundary and Maury still doesn't have lots of high SES kids in the upper grades. Ludlow-Taylor actually lost most of its in-boundary families under Principal Cobbs, who stuck around for seven long years. I see a few gentrifiers toughing things out at Payne in K in the fall, and maybe 1st grade the year after, with few (or no) high SES families in the upper grades for another eight or nine years. Can you wait that long, OP?

I seriously doubt it will take 10 years. Why? Because there aren't enough charter seats available, and not enough affordable inventory in the areas in which former Hill residents like to purchase.

It has taken longer than that to turn around Garrison around. there will always be plenty of inventory in the 'burbs...

+100. I find that relative newcomers to the city, and parents of toddlers who haven't been involved in DCPS schools yet, tend to dramatically underestimate what it takes to make a school gentrifier friendly past the early childhood years.

There are boatloads of charter seats available, just not at schools that aren't majority FARMs.

I find that many of the "experienced" people underestimate how different the current situation is than it was just a couple years ago. The demand for seats at the desirable schools exceeds the number available by more than it ever has. If those families that don't get the preferred OOB seats in the lottery start using the other schools in high enough numbers there's no guarantee the schools will change but it is a opportunity those schools haven't seen before. I don't think anyone knows the answer but comparing it to the challenges flipping Brent or Maury isn't completely valid. I'm not underestimating the challenge but I don't think you are acknowledging that the current dynamics are different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, schools don't turn around quickly -that's pie in the sky thinking. It took Brent a decade to become majority in-boundary and Maury still doesn't have lots of high SES kids in the upper grades. Ludlow-Taylor actually lost most of its in-boundary families under Principal Cobbs, who stuck around for seven long years. I see a few gentrifiers toughing things out at Payne in K in the fall, and maybe 1st grade the year after, with few (or no) high SES families in the upper grades for another eight or nine years. Can you wait that long, OP?

I seriously doubt it will take 10 years. Why? Because there aren't enough charter seats available, and not enough affordable inventory in the areas in which former Hill residents like to purchase.

It has taken longer than that to turn around Garrison around. there will always be plenty of inventory in the 'burbs...

+100. I find that relative newcomers to the city, and parents of toddlers who haven't been involved in DCPS schools yet, tend to dramatically underestimate what it takes to make a school gentrifier friendly past the early childhood years. There are boatloads of charter seats available, just not at schools that aren't majority FARMs.

I find that many of the "experienced" people underestimate how different the current situation is than it was just a couple years ago. The demand for seats at the desirable schools exceeds the number available by more than it ever has. If those families that don't get the preferred OOB seats in the lottery start using the other schools in high enough numbers there's no guarantee the schools will change but it is a opportunity those schools haven't seen before. I don't think anyone knows the answer but comparing it to the challenges flipping Brent or Maury isn't completely valid. I'm not underestimating the challenge but I don't think you are acknowledging that the current dynamics are different.

Brent and Maury have affluent catchment areas and a dearth of public housing, so "flipping" them was relatively easy. Ludlow Taylor is in a similar position, albeit the old guard was able to hang on a little longer.

Payne, JO Wilson, Tyler, Amidon and Minor are not as ripe for the picking.

So yes, the current dynamicsis different, but the challenge of assembling a cohort remains the same. The fulcrum for "flipping" Payne is in a different and more difficult place.

[Anonymous]

Payne and Garrison are in special circumstances. I really do think that change is easier to make now that the desirable charters are so tough to get into. look at Seaton, for example, and Bruce Monroe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, schools don't turn around quickly -that's pie in the sky thinking. It took Brent a decade to become majority in-boundary and Maury still doesn't have lots of high SES kids in the upper grades. Ludlow-Taylor actually lost most of its in-boundary families under Principal Cobbs, who stuck around for seven long years. I see a few gentrifiers toughing things out at Payne in K in the fall, and maybe 1st grade the year after, with few (or no) high SES families in the upper grades for another eight or nine years. Can you wait that long, OP?

I seriously doubt it will take 10 years. Why? Because there aren't enough charter seats available, and not enough affordable inventory in the areas in which former Hill residents like to purchase.

It has taken longer than that to turn around Garrison around. there will always be plenty of inventory in the 'burbs...

+100. I find that relative newcomers to the city, and parents of toddlers who haven't been involved in DCPS schools yet, tend to dramatically underestimate what it takes to make a school gentrifier friendly past the early childhood years. There are boatloads of charter seats available, just not at schools that aren't majority FARMs.

I find that many of the "experienced" people underestimate how different the current situation is than it was just a couple years ago. The demand for seats at the desirable schools exceeds the number available by more than it ever has. If those families that don't get the preferred OOB seats in the lottery start using the other schools in high enough numbers there's no guarantee the schools will change but it is a opportunity those schools haven't seen before. I don't think anyone knows the answer but comparing it to the challenges flipping Brent or Maury isn't completely valid. I'm not underestimating the challenge but I don't think you are acknowledging that the current dynamics are different.

Brent and Maury have affluent catchment areas and a dearth of public housing, so "flipping" them was relatively easy. Ludlow Taylor is in a similar position, albeit the old guard was able to hang on a little longer.

Payne, JO Wilson, Tyler, Amidon and Minor are not as ripe for the picking.

So yes, the current dynamicsis different, but the challenge of assembling a cohort remains the same. The fulcrum for "flipping" Payne is in a different and more difficult place.

I appreciate your thought out comments but am curious why you feel Payne is in a different place. The shelter at DC general was discussed up thread (but with dated stats) and from the data available it didn't appear Paynes homeless percentage is higher than the others trying to flip. Many of the DCUM threads about bowsers plan for the new shelters have comments that most of the shelter kids are below school age, but I haven't seen verifiable data for that claim. Is there something entrenched in the staff from the 2011 failed flip that you are referring to? The facility should be nice enough by the end of the renovation.

Finding the cohort you refer to seems like it has to start in ECE because the older inbounds high SES kids for any of these schools have either hit the lottery or moved. It looks like Payne has the ECE critical mass and that more people than ever want to stay in the city. The traditional escape places in MCPS and FCPS have more budget questions and schools that are packed fuller than previously. And most of the housing stock for Payne is priced when making a jump to NW is still a reach that takes a decent chuck of money or a jump in mortgage. So none of that means it will happen but the conditions seem stronger than ever before.

If you have ideas of what else helps please post. I'm sure there are folks involved reading this and ever step forward these schools take helps all of us.

[Anonymous]

NP. Because there are low income apartments, and public housing with many units within the Payne catchment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NP. Because there are low income apartments, and public housing with many units within the Payne catchment

Which buildings are you referring to? I just pulled up the Payne boundary map next to google maps and didn't recognize any big public housing projects. ( http://dme.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dme/publication/attachments/Payne.pdf ). Looks like there are a few apartment buildings near Kennedy Row, some near the old Boys and Girls club, and some four-unit buildings by the south entrance to the metro station, but much of the rest looks like row houses from the satellite imagery.

[Anonymous]

There are no large housing projects in the Payne boundary (aside from DC General). I can think of one small housing project which is mostly elderly people and doesn't feed any kids to Payne. Once DC General closes the in bound area will be pretty well off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. Because there are low income apartments, and public housing with many units within the Payne catchment

Which buildings are you referring to? I just pulled up the Payne boundary map next to google maps and didn't recognize any big public housing projects. ( http://dme.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dme/publication/attachments/Payne.pdf ). Looks like there are a few apartment buildings near Kennedy Row, some near the old Boys and Girls club, and some four-unit buildings by the south entrance to the metro station, but much of the rest looks like row houses from the satellite imagery.

They're thinking of the projects that are actually zoned to Tyler, I assume. Still, unsurprisingly, the housing stock near DC Armory isn't very nice/the residents aren't well off; that should change gradually once DC Armory closes. Although Miner is actually a marginally better school now in my opinion (mostly leadership, I think), Miner got pretty screwed with the rezoning (the new catchment area is WAY less gentrified than most of the existing area) while Payne didn't, so I'd probably bet on Payne long term. Tyler is still the most screwed long-term, because the Potomac Gardens seem to be, if anything, getting worse. But remember that schools with housing projects can do fine, is clearly the #3 elementary school in the Hill now and it has a not-very-nice housing project in its zone plus some other sketchy apartment complexes.

[Anonymous]

^^ Should say "LT is clearly the #3..."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. Because there are low income apartments, and public housing with many units within the Payne catchment

Which buildings are you referring to? I just pulled up the Payne boundary map next to google maps and didn't recognize any big public housing projects. ( http://dme.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dme/publication/attachments/Payne.pdf ). Looks like there are a few apartment buildings near Kennedy Row, some near the old Boys and Girls club, and some four-unit buildings by the south entrance to the metro station, but much of the rest looks like row houses from the satellite imagery.

They're thinking of the projects that are actually zoned to Tyler, I assume. Still, unsurprisingly, the housing stock near DC Armory isn't very nice/the residents aren't well off; that should change gradually once DC Armory closes. Although Miner is actually a marginally better school now in my opinion (mostly leadership, I think), Miner got pretty screwed with the rezoning (the new catchment area is WAY less gentrified than most of the existing area) while Payne didn't, so I'd probably bet on Payne long term. Tyler is still the most screwed long-term, because the Potomac Gardens seem to be, if anything, getting worse. But remember that schools with housing projects can do fine, is clearly the #3 elementary school in the Hill now and it has a not-very-nice housing project in its zone plus some other sketchy apartment complexes.

a lot of the PG and Hopkins kids go to Friendship Chamberlain for PK-8. It's like 700+ students and entirely FARM. Payne, Miner, and Tyler range from 1/4-1/3 IB which suggests that they're not simply places of last resort for the nearest public housing. They're likely magnets for public housing outside of Ward 6, as the IB numbers are inflated by IB ECE who may ride out a year or 2 of PK.