| In with you PP. my kids are older and forcing them to sit at the table is no fun for any of us. They ask to be excused, have finished what they will of their meal and they clear their plates. If we have friends over we usually feed kids first. N a rare occasion I'll ask them to stay seated but for the most part I don't see the point. |
|
Scenario 1: OP is a wishy-washy parent and her friend is normal. OP's kid has a few bites then goes to leave the table, while friend has barely begun. OP tells us she had already asked her kid several times to sit back down, and maybe it was in that saccharine "Oh lovey-boo, can you sit for Mommy, please?" Sort of way. Friend, who is aware that a rule without a matching consequence is just a preference, tries to help OP by saying, "Larla: sit and eat or you will miss playtime after." Larla, whose Mommy would never dream of giving her a direct order, bursts into tears. Friend rolls her eyes and OP comforts her child while thinking about what a mean mom Friend is.
Scenario 2) OP is normal and her friend is a controlling bitch. OP was doing just fine laying down the rules for her kid, but friend felt the need to aggressively enforce the exact same rules for both kids, to the point where Larla is in tears because she can't imagine having to gag down a plateful of food when she's just not hungry. My money is on number 1, and I say that as a positive discipline Ellen Satter adherant. |
| ^ I'd lean toward 1 as well. But maybe that's because I'm a controlling bitch. I have friends like OP in scenario 1. Love them, hate parenting style. (and as a result dislike kids.) |
Actually Secenario #1 is most like the closest to reality. Why? Because if it were Scenario #2, OP wouldn't be writing here for advice on how to handle it. She would already know that her friend is overly controlling, and the play dates would have stopped immediately. |
Not her business in any way or form. One stern warning, then no contact where the children are involved. I'd have a hard time staying friends with her in the first place. |
This. They push children to eat past their satiety point and then they wring their hands crying "OMG OBESITY". No shit, Sherlock? |
At your house? Wow. |
x 1,000 |
+1 |
So the trouble spot isn't really about the children eating - it's about meal time manners. It's fine that your children don't eat all their food, but manners dictate that they sit at the table until everyone is finished. That's the part you want to encourage. |
I'm one of the PPs that said it was rude to let your kid get up and play when another kid is just starting to eat. I would never dream of enforcing this with just our family on a regular basis at home. Of course I don't expect my four year old to sit quietly and watch DH and I eat and discuss our taxes. But on the occasions we have friends with kids over, yes, I'll make him stay at the table until Larla and Larlo are finished. |
Exactly. Thought this was obvious from the replies. |
| If you were eating at her house, I'd be careful to only give my kids very small portions. If she hates seeing food wasted, I'd really try not to waste her food. If it was your house and your food, I'd try to find a time without kids to have a conversation-"I like you. We parent differently. I don't want my kids held to your standards. How can we work this out so we both feel comfortable." That convo may offend her, but the only other options are not hanging out with her or putting up with the correcting. |
| When my child is at your house, your rules and vice versa. If either of us do not like the rules of the other house, then no more play dates. Simple and easy. |
No jumping on the couch and put away toys before leaving the room are great rules and one that my child should follow. This is tricky around meal times. If an adult is portioning out food and then saying a guest can't leave the table until all the food on the plate is consumed, that is not a rule I can support. |