George Zimmerman Shot and Wounded in Road Rage Incident

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He needs one of those t-shirts people give to toddlers - "Here comes trouble!"

LOL!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't feel sorry for him. Well, all of our actions and decisions have consequences.

So, you said that about Trayvon too, right? And Michael Brown, and all the other homicidal thugs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't feel sorry for him. Well, all of our actions and decisions have consequences.

So, you said that about Trayvon too, right? And Michael Brown, and all the other homicidal thugs?

Selective quoting doesn't make your argument look stronger, FYI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't feel sorry for him. Well, all of our actions and decisions have consequences.

So, you said that about Trayvon too, right? And Michael Brown, and all the other homicidal thugs?

Well, I thought we were talking about GZ, and if you can comprehend my post, I specifcally talked about decisions he made AFTER the incident. Neither Mike Brown or Trayvon ended up killing anyone so...calling them homicidal does not make much sense. See....GZ is still alive to make bad decisions and he is not in jail. So he should be thankful for that. But if he wants to gloat and profit from causing someone's death (and you are not a war hero), he should get whatever comes his way.

[Anonymous]

"Lake Mary Police Chief Steve Bracknell said the shooting may have been related to an "ongoing dispute" involving Zimmerman and another person.

Kenneth Cornell told WESH 2’s Gail Paschall-Brown that he called 911 after the alleged shooter approached him and said, “I shot George Zimmerman.” Cornell said the alleged shooter then got on the phone with dispatch and explained what happened."

gee folks - things aren't always as they seem now are they? but don't let that stop you from jumping to unfounded conclusions or wishing for the death of another human being.

The liberal lust for blood here is sickening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He needs one of those t-shirts people give to toddlers - "Here comes trouble!"

Instead he had a picture painted on him by the media -- "Kill this racist!" -- which he will have to wear for the rest of his life.

I don't feel sorry for him. Well, all of our actions and decisions have consequences. Accountability. He has made some decisions that he will have to live with. And to me, it is not about killing Trayvon Martin. Posing with the manufacturer of the gun you used to kill a teenage boy. Painting a picture of that boy and selling the pics for profit. Appearing at gun shows. Instead of showing (or even faking) remorse about the killing of another (after an altercation that he started), he tries to gain noteriety and profit from that killing. The media did not do that to him - he has made the decision and he is the one who put the target on his own back.

And thus you will justify your thirst for his death and your wallowing in schadenfreude as all his fault.

What a wonderful person you are!

Nope. Learn to read and comprehend. I did not say that I wanted him dead or anything like that. What I said is that he has to live with the consequences of his actions and decisions.

[Anonymous]

Good. Fuck that guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Lake Mary Police Chief Steve Bracknell said the shooting may have been related to an "ongoing dispute" involving Zimmerman and another person.

Kenneth Cornell told WESH 2’s Gail Paschall-Brown that he called 911 after the alleged shooter approached him and said, “I shot George Zimmerman.” Cornell said the alleged shooter then got on the phone with dispatch and explained what happened."

gee folks - things aren't always as they seem now are they? but don't let that stop you from jumping to unfounded conclusions or wishing for the death of another human being.

The liberal lust for blood here is sickening.

What conclusions do you see people jumping to? Zimmerman was shot by someone.

I'm a conservative, and I think Zimmerman was guilty of manslaughter. And he has anger issues and keeps getting into fights with people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Lake Mary Police Chief Steve Bracknell said the shooting may have been related to an "ongoing dispute" involving Zimmerman and another person.

Kenneth Cornell told WESH 2’s Gail Paschall-Brown that he called 911 after the alleged shooter approached him and said, “I shot George Zimmerman.” Cornell said the alleged shooter then got on the phone with dispatch and explained what happened."

gee folks - things aren't always as they seem now are they? but don't let that stop you from jumping to unfounded conclusions or wishing for the death of another human being.

The liberal lust for blood here is sickening.

PP here. I am not a Liberal and I do not lust for anyone's blood. It just seems to me that Conservatives have latched onto this guy as some sort of vigliante hero when, in truth, he is a hot headed fuck-up who has been in trouble most of his adult life. I can kind of see people rallying behind some of the cops, but you could do a lot better than falling on your sword for this guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't feel sorry for him. Well, all of our actions and decisions have consequences.

So, you said that about Trayvon too, right? And Michael Brown, and all the other homicidal thugs?

Well, I thought we were talking about GZ, and if you can comprehend my post, I specifcally talked about decisions he made AFTER the incident. Neither Mike Brown or Trayvon ended up killing anyone so...calling them homicidal does not make much sense. See....GZ is still alive to make bad decisions and he is not in jail. So he should be thankful for that. But if he wants to gloat and profit from causing someone's death (and you are not a war hero), he should get whatever comes his way.

You don't have to kill anyone to be homicidal. They had homicidal intent.

It does not matter that you're talking about what GZ did after the "incident". If your view is that actions have consequences, well, that should apply to Trayvon and Brown. Their actions had consequences for them. And thus you should not feel sorry for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't feel sorry for him. Well, all of our actions and decisions have consequences.

So, you said that about Trayvon too, right? And Michael Brown, and all the other homicidal thugs?

Well, I thought we were talking about GZ, and if you can comprehend my post, I specifcally talked about decisions he made AFTER the incident. Neither Mike Brown or Trayvon ended up killing anyone so...calling them homicidal does not make much sense. See....GZ is still alive to make bad decisions and he is not in jail. So he should be thankful for that. But if he wants to gloat and profit from causing someone's death (and you are not a war hero), he should get whatever comes his way.

You don't have to kill anyone to be homicidal. They had homicidal intent.

It does not matter that you're talking about what GZ did after the "incident". If your view is that actions have consequences, well, that should apply to Trayvon and Brown. Their actions had consequences for them. And thus you should not feel sorry for them.

Yea...ok

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He needs one of those t-shirts people give to toddlers - "Here comes trouble!"

Instead he had a picture painted on him by the media -- "Kill this racist!" -- which he will have to wear for the rest of his life.

I don't feel sorry for him. Well, all of our actions and decisions have consequences. Accountability. He has made some decisions that he will have to live with. And to me, it is not about killing Trayvon Martin. Posing with the manufacturer of the gun you used to kill a teenage boy. Painting a picture of that boy and selling the pics for profit. Appearing at gun shows. Instead of showing (or even faking) remorse about the killing of another (after an altercation that he started), he tries to gain noteriety and profit from that killing. The media did not do that to him - he has made the decision and he is the one who put the target on his own back.

And thus you will justify your thirst for his death and your wallowing in schadenfreude as all his fault.

What a wonderful person you are!

Nope. Learn to read and comprehend. I did not say that I wanted him dead or anything like that. What I said is that he has to live with the consequences of his actions and decisions.

Uh huh. You are perfectly happy that he has a "target on his back" but you don't want him dead. Try again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PP here. I am not a Liberal and I do not lust for anyone's blood. It just seems to me that Conservatives have latched onto this guy as some sort of vigliante hero when, in truth, he is a hot headed fuck-up who has been in trouble most of his adult life. I can kind of see people rallying behind some of the cops, but you could do a lot better than falling on your sword for this guy.

(shrug) He is not a hero to conservatives. But the liberals are certainly making him MUCH more sympathetic by hating on him and lying about him.

[Anonymous]

It's being reported that the shooter is the same guy who Zimmerman got into a "road rage incident" with last year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Lake Mary Police Chief Steve Bracknell said the shooting may have been related to an "ongoing dispute" involving Zimmerman and another person.

Kenneth Cornell told WESH 2’s Gail Paschall-Brown that he called 911 after the alleged shooter approached him and said, “I shot George Zimmerman.” Cornell said the alleged shooter then got on the phone with dispatch and explained what happened."

gee folks - things aren't always as they seem now are they? but don't let that stop you from jumping to unfounded conclusions or wishing for the death of another human being.

The liberal lust for blood here is sickening.

Not sure why you think this proves a point. This was an ongoing beef between Zimmerman and another guy and, according to some articles, this incdient resulted from a prior altercation between the two. So....I am not sure what point you proved.