So, you don't have a problem with your 7 year old daughter sitting in the sauna with a male. I don't believe you. |
| It's a private business and can do whatever it wants without being accused of being unfair. |
But she really isn't a woman like you. She is a manufactured manmade put together creation. |
NP here and a mom of a 7 year old daughter. Yes, I have a problem with both my daughter and I sitting in a sauna with a male. But I have no problem with either of us sitting in a sauna with a transgendered woman. We're all females. |
I'm going to go ahead and assume you have no kids, because they are 100% obsessed with body parts! Excuse me if I don't want my kid blurting out that that woman has a thing just like daddy. Nice straw man, this is Fairfax County, beatings, really? And it IS diffeerent than skin color, no one gets startled or double takes an AA, they just don't. |
Well transcended is not protected under title 7 and race is. |
| Transgender |
And.....? What's your point? |
There are stalls with doors in the women's restroom. Totally different. |
|
DCUM confuses me. Here are lots of posts defending the right of a man-who-sees-himself-as-a-woman using a women's locker room. I seem to remember periodic hysteria on this forum ranting about women who bring their 6/7/8yo sons into the women's locker room, and how traumatizing it is for other women and their daughters.
Just curious if you are all consistent in your moral indignation and/or political correctness. |
No, transgenders have their penises still attached. There is nothing female about that, especially while sitting in a hit sauna. |
You're absolutely right--the business can do whatever it wants to do. But folks can accuse it of being unfair all they want, just like folks accuse country clubs for being unfair for not allowing women to be members or accuse the Boy Scouts for being unfair by not allowing gay members. In the case of Spa World, anyone who thinks it's unfair can simply choose to not spend their money there. |
No these people are not consistent. But wait for it, they will attempt to distinguish the undistinguishable. |
Spa world will have a tough road. People like you would patronize and allow your daughter to walk around and watch nude men. Hmm, I wonder if your husband would agree. People like me would not patronize the likes of Spa With the knowledge that the establishment allows people with male body parts to walk around nude in the ladies section of the facilities. |
|
I am the parent of a trans kid (teenager now) and I am incredibly supportive of all trans rights -- and let me tell you, if my kid (born female but identified as male since the Elmo years) was using the men's locker room, I would say - "hey babe, cover up those private parts with a towel." And I am pretty sure my teen would roll his eyes and reply, "Like, duh, mom." Same thing if my kid was born male, I'm absolutely sure that Mr. Happy would not see any airtime in a female locker room. My kid would be mortified if it happened. In my view, as informed by my actual experiences with the trans community, this is something the fear-mongers have just jinned up. The trans folk I know are incredibly educated, sensitive, thoughtful people (something about this condition engenders a lot of introspection and contemplation, wow, imagine that!). In my experience, most trans people have NO interest in advertising or highlighting their original physical gender, they are all about changing their appearance to their true internal gender. The idea of a trans woman flashing her pre-op male genitals in a locker room runs counter to absolutely everything I know about transgendered folks. I mean, it is laughable, actually. Re this story - I am willing to bet that she didn't display her private parts. Think about it. The spa owners would have claimed that fact, it would have made their story oh-so-much more compelling. And the press would have highlighted that fact, it would have made their story oh-so-much more interesting. |