Why can't Obama produce a birth certificate?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:At least Biden is American. If Obama has covered all this crap up, he is not trustworty and should leave.


Thank you for your service Captain Loonbag Teapants Moonbat. You sir, are a Beacon of Freedom in our darkest hours!
I know, the only thing stupider is all those people who think Obama has a real birth certificate.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Thats a very complicated and hilarious smoke-screen. I like the effort. He doesn't have a birth certificate and calls of racism just prove how scared his supprters are of this development. FYI, the charge of racism is boring and it has no effect on me anymore. It no longer carries any sting. You are a blood libeler! There we are even.
Really? Weren't you just the other day deciding which half of his genetic identity is responsible for his lips and skin color?

It's not oldand it is not boring. It is true, you are a bigot.

Anonymous
No seriously. Why do liberals resort to calling people stupid when they ask about Obama's birth certificate? That seems like the ultimate response

"Where is Obama's birth certificate?"
"You're just a stupid hillbilly who hates black people and I wont answer that question".
Anonymous
Here's why people call you stupid:

Because Obama did produce his birth certificate, and the officials of the state where he was born certified that it was genuine.

In addition, there was a birth announcement in the local paper, impossible to plant 50 years later.

This was, of course, after birthers claimed that the birth certificate was a forgery, and after numerous fake Kenyan birth certificates were floated around.

So the question is answered. There is no evidence whatsoever that Obama was not born in Hawaii, and all of the evidence shows that he was born in Hawaii.

Of course, even if he wasn't born in the United States, he would still be a United States citizen because one of his parents was a United States citizen.

So the question is triply answered.

But the birther response is, well where is the "original" birth certificate? After all that happened above, there is no question that even if Obama were to produce yet another piece of paper, it would not be good enough for the birthers. There would be accusations that it is a forgery. People would say that it's suspicious that he didn't release it for so long, just as someone above ludicrously says it's suspicious that a birth announcement was placed in a Hawaii newspaper in 1961. Really? You're suggesting they thought their african american baby might be President and therefore placed a phony birth announcement 50 years ago? If they were going to go to that much trouble, why wouldn't they just have his mother brought to the U.S. for the birth?

If you keep questioning a fact that has already been conclusively proved in multiple different ways, then you are either stupid or biased.

Imagine that you walk into a store and are accused of having stolen your watch, which you bought five years ago. The police ask you, where is the receipt? You offer a photocopy of the receipt you found in your files. Ok, they say, but where is the original receipt? I don't know, you say, but here is the original packaging and the warranty card I sent in. They ask, but where is the original receipt? I still don't know, you say, but here is a videotape from the store's security cameras showing me buying the watch in 2006. If they still ask for the original receipt, do you have any doubt they are either stupid or out to get you?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Here's why people call you stupid:

Because Obama did produce his birth certificate, and the officials of the state where he was born certified that it was genuine.

In addition, there was a birth announcement in the local paper, impossible to plant 50 years later.

This was, of course, after birthers claimed that the birth certificate was a forgery, and after numerous fake Kenyan birth certificates were floated around.

So the question is answered. There is no evidence whatsoever that Obama was not born in Hawaii, and all of the evidence shows that he was born in Hawaii.

Of course, even if he wasn't born in the United States, he would still be a United States citizen because one of his parents was a United States citizen.

So the question is triply answered.

But the birther response is, well where is the "original" birth certificate? After all that happened above, there is no question that even if Obama were to produce yet another piece of paper, it would not be good enough for the birthers. There would be accusations that it is a forgery. People would say that it's suspicious that he didn't release it for so long, just as someone above ludicrously says it's suspicious that a birth announcement was placed in a Hawaii newspaper in 1961. Really? You're suggesting they thought their african american baby might be President and therefore placed a phony birth announcement 50 years ago? If they were going to go to that much trouble, why wouldn't they just have his mother brought to the U.S. for the birth?

If you keep questioning a fact that has already been conclusively proved in multiple different ways, then you are either stupid or biased.

Imagine that you walk into a store and are accused of having stolen your watch, which you bought five years ago. The police ask you, where is the receipt? You offer a photocopy of the receipt you found in your files. Ok, they say, but where is the original receipt? I don't know, you say, but here is the original packaging and the warranty card I sent in. They ask, but where is the original receipt? I still don't know, you say, but here is a videotape from the store's security cameras showing me buying the watch in 2006. If they still ask for the original receipt, do you have any doubt they are either stupid or out to get you?


If this is the case he can't be President. You do know this right?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here's why people call you stupid:

Because Obama did produce his birth certificate, and the officials of the state where he was born certified that it was genuine.

In addition, there was a birth announcement in the local paper, impossible to plant 50 years later.

This was, of course, after birthers claimed that the birth certificate was a forgery, and after numerous fake Kenyan birth certificates were floated around.

So the question is answered. There is no evidence whatsoever that Obama was not born in Hawaii, and all of the evidence shows that he was born in Hawaii.

Of course, even if he wasn't born in the United States, he would still be a United States citizen because one of his parents was a United States citizen.

So the question is triply answered.

But the birther response is, well where is the "original" birth certificate? After all that happened above, there is no question that even if Obama were to produce yet another piece of paper, it would not be good enough for the birthers. There would be accusations that it is a forgery. People would say that it's suspicious that he didn't release it for so long, just as someone above ludicrously says it's suspicious that a birth announcement was placed in a Hawaii newspaper in 1961. Really? You're suggesting they thought their african american baby might be President and therefore placed a phony birth announcement 50 years ago? If they were going to go to that much trouble, why wouldn't they just have his mother brought to the U.S. for the birth?

If you keep questioning a fact that has already been conclusively proved in multiple different ways, then you are either stupid or biased.

Imagine that you walk into a store and are accused of having stolen your watch, which you bought five years ago. The police ask you, where is the receipt? You offer a photocopy of the receipt you found in your files. Ok, they say, but where is the original receipt? I don't know, you say, but here is the original packaging and the warranty card I sent in. They ask, but where is the original receipt? I still don't know, you say, but here is a videotape from the store's security cameras showing me buying the watch in 2006. If they still ask for the original receipt, do you have any doubt they are either stupid or out to get you?


If this is the case he can't be President. You do know this right?


He is president, you do know this right?
HA HA HA HA HA
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:No seriously. Why do liberals resort to calling people stupid when they ask about Obama's birth certificate? That seems like the ultimate response

"Where is Obama's birth certificate?"
"You're just a stupid hillbilly who hates black people and I wont answer that question".


OK then, the Supreme Court denied the birther petitions. So now that the highest law of the land has ruled on it, including all of the conservatives on the court, why do you think that your dime store theories have more merit than their ruling?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Thats a very complicated and hilarious smoke-screen. I like the effort. He doesn't have a birth certificate and calls of racism just prove how scared his supprters are of this development. FYI, the charge of racism is boring and it has no effect on me anymore. It no longer carries any sting. You are a blood libeler! There we are even.
Really? Weren't you just the other day deciding which half of his genetic identity is responsible for his lips and skin color?

It's not oldand it is not boring. It is true, you are a bigot.

i said he looks like a vampire and has purple lips. If thats what you think certain races look like then YOU are the racist. Oh and also a blood libeler. thats 2 horrible things . go back tunder your racist, blood libel rock.
Anonymous
I am so glad that the racist label has been over-used and is now meaningless. People who use it are really stupid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My DH is from Hawaii and we needed his birth certificate for a visa. It took us 48 hours to get it overnighted to us.



What year was your DH born?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I am so glad that the racist label has been over-used and is now meaningless. People who use it are really stupid.


No, people who refuse all evidence of Obama being born in HAwai are stupid AND racist.
You are a racist. Got it?
Anonymous
It's because Obama was never actually "born". He is a cyborg created by aliens from the planet Xenu. They sent him as an "infant" to the newest state so he could pretend to be American, become a lawyer, senator and then slip though the constitutional cracks some 47 years later and be elected President. At which point, he would be positioned to tranform the United States and eventually the word into an extremist islamist socialist planet, which all the Xenuians would then come to inhabit. Hawaii's governor is also Xenuian, which is why he claims Obama was born there. And the US Supreme Court denied the petition because they are in on it too. Glenn Beck is actually also a Xenuian, who has created the anti-Obama market in order to empty the pockets of the hard-working real Americans (with birth certificates) and provide it back to the Xenuians the help fund their stealing of America.

Anonymous
They should just admit he doesn't have a birth certificate. Because he doesn't. End of story.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am so glad that the racist label has been over-used and is now meaningless. People who use it are really stupid.


No, people who refuse all evidence of Obama being born in HAwai are stupid AND racist.
You are a racist. Got it?
at least you realize that racist isn't a name that means anything anymore and you had to throw stupid just to make your point. BTW. the people who still aren't aware that the President has no real birth certificate are stupid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Thats a very complicated and hilarious smoke-screen. I like the effort. He doesn't have a birth certificate and calls of racism just prove how scared his supprters are of this development. FYI, the charge of racism is boring and it has no effect on me anymore. It no longer carries any sting. You are a blood libeler! There we are even.
Really? Weren't you just the other day deciding which half of his genetic identity is responsible for his lips and skin color?

It's not oldand it is not boring. It is true, you are a bigot.

i said he looks like a vampire and has purple lips. If thats what you think certain races look like then YOU are the racist. Oh and also a blood libeler. thats 2 horrible things . go back tunder your racist, blood libel rock.


Oh, it's too late for you to plead innocence on race anymore. I've seen your posts. You try to inject race into lots of discussions. And you try to be clever about it, but you aren't fooling anyone. If you were put to a real test, like saying this stuff in person to a real black man, you would shrink back into your little hole. But you can be so brave when you are hiding behind your computer. Do we have to revisit some of your posts from the past?
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: