It is completely made up. |
| I remember at the HM tour this year, our tour guide had already gotten accepted into UChicago via that Early program (this was well prior to December). Agree that they are sending a ton to Chicago and not as much as you would expect to Ivy (certainly not similar to years past- some mom on Facebook was saying 18 kids went to Harvard her year, but this was back in the 1990s glory days and she hadn’t realized it changed). |
Many people will take Chicago (or Duke for this matter) over Brown or Cornell. |
|
Brearley's early decision so far this year (a few are likely missing as this is about a month old now):
Harvard 5, Yale 3, Princeton 2, Penn 2, Brown 2, Cornell 2, Columbia 1, Chicago 3, Duke 1, Williams 1, Swarthmore 1, Oberlin 1, NYU 1, Wesleyan 1 |
| all these schools seem to send to Ivy Leagues but once in few years to MIT but public specialized schools like Stuyvesant, Bronx Science, Brooklyn Tech send 5-6 each year to MIT and Stanford. |
Right, most of these privates are not geared toward MIT. |
Very impressive! The idea that they are slipping is insane. It’s weird how many people on this forum have this bizarre agenda to smear the school’s reputation. Spence, Chapin, and yes, Brearley are all great schools. As are the many others in the city. None are perfect and year to year you’ll have kids with different interests and priorities which will result in variation in college placements but by and large these stats are super strong for a school the size of Brearley |
| But also let’s take into account out of 5 going to Harvard regardless of which school 2 or 3 are reserved for big donors, board kids etc whether it’s Spence or Brearley. Chapin is doing well this year if you mean two posted to Harvard but both are big big generational kids. |
Yes, there are a lot of rich kids and legacy kids in NYC. And they go to all the private schools and even the publics in NYC. Yet some of the privates do better with college matriculation than others. |
I mean— what would be the reason why HM’s matriculation has faltered recently (presuming that that’s true - which - how do people know this?) ? There hasn’t been a big turnover in counselor or teacher staff, and it seems that the admissions are just as selective as they ever were (and same people for a bunch of years). What gives? |
At least for certain disciplines I’d easily take UChicago over Columbia. |
I don’t see any evidence that it’s about the schools themselves rather than they kids they attract; these things are very trendy, admissions offices change, scholarship budgets change, bad press scares away kids, celebrity pulls their kid in a huff and a bunch of other kids follow… I don’t believe that there’s some magic formula Brearley applies that gets a girl into Harvard who would have had to settle for UChicago if she want to HM or Dalton. |
No idea but in the 2000s they regularly sent 10+ kids to a Harvard per year (I went) and nowadays they are sending 3-4 (‘23-‘25 they sent 11 kids). Not bad but not what it used to be. |
| What about Trinity? Last yer Dalton sent 8 to Harvard,3 to Yale and 4 to Princeton |
This statement also is made up lol. Everyone here really does seem to have an axe to grind |