Eh everyone is different and what works for some people doesn’t work for others. You know theory of mind and all that. I think the bigger piece here is that it sounds like she makes enough money where even if the spouse is making $1M+, you miss the income when it’s gone. Worth noting the younger generations are much more focused on FAT FIRE / coast FIRE and all that jazz and losing $200-300K year even if you’re making $1M or whatever hurts those goals. |
+1 A man is not a plan. |
She’s fine with working, but wants to focus on kids (4 minimum), and with that many kids working full time would be challenging for her, she isn’t avoiding working at all and could work part-time. She wastes zero time with guys that aren’t for her, and she’s still very young, ambitious, and is fully into her goals including becoming a wife of a doctor, she’s used to the prestige. We raised her to chase her goals and dreams, and she worked hard in school and college. She’s an adult now, so that means we’re not going to stop her from making her own career choices, whether that means being a stay-at-home mom or a working mom. That’s entirely up to her. We let her decide. I don’t get the stigma against SAHM. My kid is financially set for life, and can always get right back into a career if needed, or can stay home too (whether married or not). |
tow sales family here as well! My SH spent many year chasing IPOs and The bear RSU packages He has this luxury because my accounts are i’m very stable and I make a consistent 375-425 each year without fail. He has has some total busts and once hit that jackpot that was financially life changing. No way would he have been able to do that if I didn’t have that steady income. |
Isn’t this the truth! I have one in college and one in high school and in high school it is SO SO SO hard to get parent participation and it’s probably 80% working parents dedicating their time. |
| I have a gen z son, recent college grad who landed a great job, but lives at home while he invests al his income he would otherwise spend on housing/commute/ utilities (we live 2 miles from his job). He is adamant that he only marries someone who put their education to work and earns an income. I think this generation (z) is acutely aware that it’s unrealistic in today’s economy to not have all hands on deck when raising a family. |
SAHM here. Kid goes to Harvard and we are full pay. We were saving for grad school and expected DC to attend undergrad on merit scholarship — which they received a full ride. Now cash flowing Harvard so it can be done. |
So they can put it on their resume? |
huh? who is “they” and what are they putting on their resume? Or did you respond to the wrong thread? highly confused. |
Yes, the SAHM is still high status. Incomes are higher though. High earning men with SAHM and 3+ kids in private school requires an income of 800K+. DH earns 2-3m. I stopped working to focus on the kids when he was earning around 800k. |
| I am envious of dual working couples, especially dr/att or two attorneys as those HHI numbers double and they have income to set up trusts or have more homes, but there is a palpable level of stress from some and I think its hard to generalize or glamorize. |
DP That sounds amazing for her, to have that financial security. It makes me wonder if we all had that, how our choices would vary. |
I think people are negatively reacting to your fantasy land because we live life and that’s not how it works. Are you saying she’s a trust fund baby and it doesn’t really matter never has been divorces her because you are gonna give her money. An engineer out of work for five years has no idea what is going on because technology changes too quickly. |
| OP here- I’m friends with a lot of these dual couples and people aren’t that stressed. It actually seems like being a SAHM with a big law partner husband is more stressful. For example, my friend who is a law partner at a major firm (she has 3+ kids btw) and her husband is a surgeon has tons of help, feels valuable and sets boundaries at work. Her husband respects her work and she respected his work. There is no stress re what happens if someone loses their job. The SAHM with law partners seem to never see their partners and cater to their big earners whims to make sure they stay employed + do most of the childcare to rationalize their choice |
Sure but the women are still responsible for planning and managing all outsourcing. |