|
I would expect them to say we defer to the executive as to whether there was an emergency. But as of today there is no emergency and in the future an emergency must have x, y, and z under the statute. In 60 days tariffs end. Congress can enact legislation if it wants over those 60 days.
No refunds. Tariffs end. Congress free to act. Can’t do it again unless x, y, and z are met. That opinion gets 9-0 in parts. |
Not one business is going to lower prices no matter what the SCOTUS outcome. Publix, Home Depot, Wallmart, Target blame them |
The Court is not going to touch at all the existence of, or the requisite conditions for, an emergency. Even if that was the holding, Thomas would not sign it. |
Let's bring back the Nixon/Ford/Carter wage and price controls for a few months just so we all remember; "oh, right. That was a terrible idea." Private companies are free to set prices however they wish. If people are willing to pay, then we get what we have. Prices will stabilize when we regain access to cheap imported goods and labor (immigrants). Alternatively, people reach a point where they no longer can borrow more. Look up the "Volcker shock" if you are too young to remember. |
At least Nixon had clear statutory authority granted by Congress to do so https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Stabilization_Act_of_1970 |
Yup. |
Nah, SCOTUS creates new doctrine every time they rule in favor of Trump. What you wrote above is the standard applied to democrat presidents only. |
| Of course everyone in this thread thinks SCOTUS will overturn tariffs, the money forum here is just known for being wrong. Look, SCOTUS entertained the government's argument that tariffs weren't enacted to generate revenue so that they can allow tariffs to stand. Just because the President tells the US everyday that his tariffs bring in revenue doesn't make it true. |
That is a required part of their ruling. They cannot reach the question without it. And yes Thomas would join parts of the opinion i outlined but not other parts. This is not a hard case. |
|
My prediction if tariffs are overturned:
-Interest rates go up because of deteriorating fiscal condition of the U.S. since this will blow a hole in the federal budget, higher mortgage rates -Price of gold goes up -Consumer prices flatline, rate of inflation falls below 2% -Stock market rally in companies/sector reliant on imports - consumer good (Walmart, Home Depot), electronics (Apple, Samsung), automotive (US and foreign), small cap stocks -Tariffs refunds inject money into the economy - less layoffs, more economic activity - |
Republicans don't know how to balance a budget - they always drive up the deficit with their stupid plans. |
| Overturning tariffs would be a huge gift to Trump and would allow him to escape the consequences of crashing the US economy. There's a possibility of a unanimous decision upholding the tariffs, conservatives to show adequate fealty to Trump and the liberals to deliver a crap sandwich Trump will ignorantly eat. Plus letting Trump impose random tariff percentages on whatever products really muddles Republican messaging on the economy ("well we lowered tariffs on China from 100% to 85% and the 47% increase on steel will let you buy cars at a 2.78% discount"). Democrats can just say whatever Trump is doing is raising prices, inflation, and unemployment. |
^ seems most likely |
The problem with this theory is that the liberal justices have integrity and actually rule on the merits of the case, unlike the regressive ones who rule however will cement more GOP power. |
Really making a lot of assumptions about a court which a year ago invented an unwritten immunity clause into Article II. Nothing is required from them, they can do whatever they want. |