|
what do these abbreviations mean?
I G S etc |
| Instead of moving everything out while trying to time things you should keep an asset allocation based on your time horizon and risk tolerance. Instead of being 100% in stocks consider moving to an 80/20 or even 70/30 split which will reduce volatility but still allow you to ride future market growth. |
| I took one of those week-long retirement classes awhile back and the smartest advice I got came from the financial guy. He said never put anything in G or a Life Cycle fund. Put it 50:50 in C:S and ride out all storms. Even if you’re near or in retirement— it’s not like you’re going to suddenly liquidate and historically it always recovers and grows. I had $400 K in 2012 and have $2.4 M today, following his advice. |
PS I’m still working and contributing; my salary is high (200K plus) so that helps. |
Those are fund types. I for international fund S for small cap C for s&p500 fund L for lifecycle fund based on your expected retirement date |
Not what I experienced with L2020. |
That's crappy advice for too many reasons to list. |
There are no projected issues in 2025 and 2026. Could something come out of the blue? Of course. Could Trump mess things up? Yes. But nothing so far has had an impact and the economy is quite strong. |
+1. Unless you are retiring this year, maybe. |
Mock me all you want! I also bought my house in 2010 at pretty much the bottom. |
Actually, it isn't for feds thanks to pension and SS/SS supplement. For many, you don't even have to touch TSP. I personally wouldn't do 50/50 between CS but I am also 100% in CS (similar balance as PP ~2.3) |
And refinanced part of the mortgage in 2020 at 2.5%. Yes some is luck but the rest is common sense. I cringed but kept quiet when my friends told me in early April they were moving money out of the market on the same days I was buying. I know they would have thought I was crazy. |
Ok, enjoy the ride. You will almost certainly lose. |
The question then becomes how much cash flow are you counting on from TSP. If you can meet all of your expenses from your pension then by all means take whatever risks you want with your TSP, but if you need $75 or $100k a year from TSP to support your lifestyle you probably want to manage the risks thst comes with a 100% stock portfolio and mix in some fixed income (especially the G fund which has the best risk adjusted return of any fixed income investment) And the fact that this approach worked well over the incredible bull market of the last 10 years is not evidence it will always work (some people might suggest it’s actually less likely to work well over the next 10 years but who knows). |
Most retired feds aren't GS 15s retiring with fat cat pensions, so they will absolutely be withdrawing from their TSP. Very few people, especially those on retirement have the risk tolerance for 100% equity. Not recommending any international is kind of crazy, especially considering the fact that all lifecycle funds include international. Recommending 50% small cap is also not advisable due to volatility and very thin evidence that a small cap premium without a quality filter exists. |