I'm the pp who regrets sending my kid to field and I completely agree with the bolded. One of the reasons that I'm upset at field is that they promised us specific accommodations and support -- we shared the neuropsych and IEP and discussed it in detail -- and then failed to live up to their promises. A rejection would have been much better. |
This is terrible advice. Not disclosing can lead to a situation where the kid is asked to leave. Much better to be transparent upfront and be rejected than to be asked to leave later on. |
I'd add Fusion, Oakwood, Commonwealth, Linder, Lab |
Not Lab. They don't accept autistic students. I'd add Sycamore to this list. |
This comports with my experience as well (albeit not at Deal). For kids on the spectrum who are on track academically, DCPS works. |
Depends what you mean by “quirky” and “struggling to figure out social norms.” |
+1. I get really REALLY annoyed at all the mainstream private school parents who claim “oh, 50% of the kids at our Big3 are neurodivergent! It will be fine! So common!” It’s just totally false. While there may be a small cohort of actually autistic kids at top privates, they’re mostly likely very mildly affected and never had behavioral issues, and were accepted prior to the diagnosis. The rest are all extremely mild ADHD or “ADHD.” Kids like mine (and possibly OP’s) who are gifted but visibly spectrumy even if not disruptive (stimming, prosody, eye contact differences, etc) will not get past an interview. |
conversely, Lab is a school for language disorders and many kids on the spectrum are adept with language and would be poorly served at Lab. |
Agreed. I have one AuDHD kid at a SN school who would never be successful in a mainstream private school because their support needs -- EF, social, academic -- are too high, and an ADHD kid who is thriving in such a school because all they need is basic accommodations. Picking a school means being ruthlessly honest, with yourself and any prospective school, about your child's needs. |
You keep saying lightweight but as someone else said an IEP is not lightweight, a 504 is. Keep him in a public school where they have to legally accommodate him. Or apply to lab. |
| What about Barrie? |
We were you a couple years ago (rejected at almost the same 3 schools as you) but we were already in MCPS (IEP less lightweight, but still not enough to qualify for 2e or Aspergers programs). Look at Nora, Parkmont and Templeton. Also, fire your educational consultant. |
| We have a somewhat similar kid at Diener for middle with plans for Parkmont or Nora for high school. |
| The challenge is that we are all becoming much more aware of the wide spectrum of kids with a variety of these conditions. I have an ADHD/ASD/dyslexic kid. It’s confusing that the schools who serve kids with adhd and dyslexia won’t serve mine. And they likely have other kids on the spectrum amongst those currently in their classes. They’re just not diagnosed. Continuing to serve ONLY one of these types of kids may not be sustainable as time goes on. |
|
We have an AuADHD kid that left public for a smaller private (not special needs) for middle school.
I’m not sure we made the right decision. Smaller schools make it much harder to make friends and you are more likely to stand out as socially awkward with small classes. Plus, a lot of those kids (at private) have been together since K and it’s a hard social scene to break into - regardless of special needs. Ivymount and other special needs schools are not appropriate for a kid with a light IEP. I think you should feel comfortable sending your kid to public middle. We are in APS, so the middle school would have been the same size as Deal. The big size will give your kid more opportunities for friendship. All parents worry about this jump and understandably, you have reason to worry more. But I think you will find that it works out best for your child. |