Liberals need to have empathy for my wallet.
Why do they make affording life so, soooko difficult because of their taxes and all do the red tape that drives up costs for everything? They don't have problems giving out free housing to foreign nationals in swanky cities like New York or San Fran, but if you're a citizen, they want to upzone and ruin your neighborhood while taxing the ever loving crap out of you for the privilege to the point it makes being able to love and pay bills difficult. Spare me the speeches about 'empathy'. Liberals have zero empathy for our own citizens. Everything they do makes everything worse. |
Selfishness and greed. See it here for yourself. Money is all that matters. Screw human beings, give me MONEY! |
Ahhh, all the "red tape"...the MAGA boogeyman that's never articulated. |
Maybe all Magas - Trump voters - are not all the same, just as all Democratic voters - liberals - are not all the same. |
Yes. |
Like they did for your generation? |
Empathy can be properly reserved for the truly unfortunate, but can be tempered by a belief that people should help themselves to the maximum extent possible before turning to the government. That perspective results in antipathy to government welfare activities which can be seen as excessive, enabling those who could do better if they chose to but who made life choices which resulted in very low non-welfare incomes. Republicans understandably have little empathy for such people, but can support aid to people who are disabled, or victims of natural disasters - whose misfortunes were not arguably of their own making. There is little empathy for those who claim their situations are the results of societal animus, when it appears obvious enough that such claimants are simply unaccomplished and seek explanations for their own failures, a hidden hand which maliciously works against them which is visible only through statistical arguments which are merely descriptive, not reflective of causation. Similarly, antagonism for illegals is not reflective of a lack of empathy for the poor conditions in other countries which might make people want to emigrate, but reflects instead a belief that breaking U.S. law is not thereby justified.
|
Crux of the issue. In this two party country we are forced to choose one side, but it doesn't mean that we blindly support everything that the party represents or that we are all the same as humans. I can't understand the simplistic mind that would even ask this question. But it is not a real question anyway, just a provocation. |
The problem with liberals is that they don’t show enough empathy for bigots. |
Umm, you can’t really believe the R’s are going to bring prices down? You do understand that their basic plan is to privatize as much as possible to be able to reap profits for themselves and their rich buddies. Private firms work for profit. That expense is passed on to someone. Guess who that is? |
It means that you accept everything that party does. Nothing is a dealbreaker for you. |
No more than progressives have empathy for conservatives (they don't).
Trump is behaving like a conservative equivalent of a progressive president. Funny how hysterical a lot of you are. |
Logic fail x2 |
I do think it is. We are forced to be polite all the time so as not to hurt people or to be respectful. My kids school they call teachers by their first name but for a while they went to school in Fla and were asked to call them ‘miss x’. That was forced speech. But whatev. That was important to those teachers |
That’s not how you spell capisce. Also no you’re not really answering the question. Are you saying you think liberal empathy is disingenuous and you dislike that? Or it’s impractical financially? Or both? And if so, which is more irritating? |