But they didn’t question her. They handcuffed her and detained her. With your logic, because white males commit the most white-collared crimes, police should go around and slapping handcuffs on every white guy wearing a suit walking around? Questioning is fine. Handcuffing and detaining random, innocent people crosses the line. The cops had a picture of the woman carjacker. How hard is it to look at the picture and look at the girl in question and say “oh that’s not her”. Especially a 11-year old leaving a middle school in broad daylight. Sometimes, you have to use basic logic, the cops used none here. |
+1 I don’t think I’ve ever seen a white 11 year old mistaken for a grown woman. |
That's a study about menarche. The age at which a girl gets her first period has absolutely nothing to do with the age at which a child needs to be treated more carefully because of being a child. Adulting is when people, including these police officers, assume that a child of color, and often it's a black girl, counts as a "teen" or "adult" and treat them as such, rather than providing the accommodations and protections that they would provide a white child the same age. It's a significant problem. I am quite confident that if the car had been stolen by white woman, the officers would have either immediately focused on the differences between the long haired woman in a puffy coat with lines on it, and the shorter haired child with a smooth coat in front of them and never stopped her at all, or if they had stopped her would have treated her gently and contacted her parents immediately. Because they would have seen her as a young child, not a "juvenile" and felt protective. That is adulting. I'm also going to point out, that since people are saying that a certain demographic steals cars regularly, that that demographic is male. If you're OK with a child being handcuffed because they meet one demographic criteria but not others of other people who steal cars, I'm assuming you'd be OK with your 11 year old white sons being detained in handcuffs, since they also meet one demographic criteria. On the other hand, if you'd be upset if your white child was detained with no contact to you before or after because someone who was also male but a different age, outfit, and physical appearance stole a car, then you should be upset here. |
That’s the part that bothers me the most who think it’s okay to just go up to any kid and put them in cuffs. This can be your child, but we’re supposed to be okay with this situation because “lots of kids are stealing cars”. I don’t think any parent here would say “this was acceptable” if it was their own. |
If you pay attention, the parents of child carjackers, who are both boys and girls, generally think it is unacceptable to arrest or detain their children. |
Not 11, but a few years older, yes |
+1 The police were right since the girl matched the description: skin color, jacket color, unusual pants that matched, and in the vicinity of the crime. |
They weren’t right. You don’t handcuff a child, unless you know they committed a crime. We have rights. |
Totally missed PP’s point. |
Why is everyone looking for a major handout? Amazing culture |
I know the difference between a child and an adult. If you don't you shouldn't be a cop. |
It’s not a payout. It’s about holding police departments accountable. Unfortunately, the only thing that typically happens is a settlement. While the cops just get a slap on the wrist and some “training”. |
The problem is that there is a huge amount of black children stealing cars so if we want to avoid these types of mistakes the culture of car stealing needs to be stopped |
Maybe they can pay for some therapy bills. Why would she get a vacation, college tuition a new house ? WTF is this the Powerball? |
Nobody mentioned any of that except for you. |