| Of course admissions based on college performance is more meaningful than admissions based on high school. |
| No need to waste more money and time on master’s |
Which Ivy ? Worthless post without naming the particular Ivy ? My money is on Columbia. |
You are so obnoxious. And not as smart as you think you are, “Ivy TA”. |
Columbia is run like Liberty University. |
|
Grad schools are way easier to get in.
Best students are working for top companies making $$$ out of colleges lol |
Oh, you’re that troll. You give real Ted Cruz vibes. Someone who also shouldn’t have received an Ivy degree. |
+1 |
It’s called: holistic admissions. |
Nepotism and political connections shouldn’t be part of that if you’re arguing admissions are merit based. |
Not true in Econ... |
| Many Ivy undergrads are great, smart, brilliant, etc. The people I know who have taught at Ivies and at state flagships all say that the top tier at flagships is as good as the top tier at Ivies. Kids in honors programs at state schools are brilliant too and are competitive with the smart Ivy kids. There may be a longer tail of only merely very smart kids versus brilliant kids at the state schools, but they are good places to be. |
Typical what-aboutism. |
| This thread is basically one dude bro pumping himself up that he is amazing because he got into an ivy for graduate school and is therefore more deserving than undergrads. Weird. I wish these “elite” schools would stop admitting so many dark triad types. |
+1 after a certain threshold in stats, admissions to T20 becomes like a lottery. The smart kids who don't win the lottery often end up at the large flagship with a lot of merit. |