600 child abuse victims of the Catholic Church in MD

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:….and not one of the perpetrators was transgender.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/us/catholic-church-abuse-baltimore.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

#GROOMERS

No, but they were predominantly homosexual pedophiles.

No they were not. It’s a crime of opportunity male abusers are more likely to work at all boys schools. When moved to girls schools they continued to abuse.

The statistics show it was overwhelmingly male on male abuse.

[Anonymous]

I will never ever believe that the hierarchy gives one iota about babies and lives. The more vulnerable and neglected children in the world, the more prey for the church's deliberate organization of child rapists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I will never ever believe that the hierarchy gives one iota about babies and lives. The more vulnerable and neglected children in the world, the more prey for the church's deliberate organization of child rapists.

Happy Easter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I will never ever believe that the hierarchy gives one iota about babies and lives. The more vulnerable and neglected children in the world, the more prey for the church's deliberate organization of child rapists.

Well, you are wrong, but all you know is the bad news you read. And it is beyond bad and indefensible. May the changes instituted in the 80s continue protect children and punish wrong doers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Many of these priests are names we already knew from prior investigations. Is this new information? Rehashed information + new information? Awful either way, though.

This is not true. Many of the abuser priests are alive and unknown to their neighbors. Some live in nice retirement communities. They are not on abuser registries, they pass background checks as had no convictions. They had no convictions because both church and state worked together to protect them. There were 43 previously unknown clergy abusers from AOB found in the AG investigation, and the archdiocese is paying to redact their names and the names of high ranking clergy who covered up the abuse. https://www.baltimoresun.com/maryland/bs-md-catholic-coverup-20230408-zryrofbvmrb6zkhyzonyclfxsi-story.html

The article said 10 names were redacted (some due to unsubstantiated claims) and the rest are dead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will never ever believe that the hierarchy gives one iota about babies and lives. The more vulnerable and neglected children in the world, the more prey for the church's deliberate organization of child rapists.

Well, you are wrong, but all you know is the bad news you read. And it is beyond bad and indefensible. May the changes instituted in the 80s continue protect children and punish wrong doers.

It's hard to believe this, when many of the wrong doers who enabled the sex abuse of children, have been celebrated or promoted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does the Catholic Church attract so many sociopaths. I get the reason gay men or pedophiles used to think the church was good place to hide out. But the sheer sociapathic and violent behavior of nuns and priests towards kids and teens in orphanages,Irish laundries, forced boarding schools—its mind boggling. Whipping and beating wasn’t enough, they got off on torturing young people. Anyone who sits in a Catholic Church every Sunday is complicit in this coverup. Still.

Why are posters like you sociopaths?

Who put gay and pedophile in a sentence as if they are similar or even related.

A person who prays in a Catholic church and tries to live a life like Christ is complicit in child abuse? Hmm. You need help with your anger and bigotry.

You’re incredibly ignorant.

Sitting in a pew does not get you to heaven, trying to be Christ like doesn’t either… being Christ like does.., you are not.

You can’t plead ignorance when judgement day comes and someone who thinks a pedophile and a gay person are similar is a sinner and your soul will burn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:….and not one of the perpetrators was transgender.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/us/catholic-church-abuse-baltimore.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

#GROOMERS

No, but they were predominantly homosexual pedophiles.

No they were not. It’s a crime of opportunity male abusers are more likely to work at all boys schools. When moved to girls schools they continued to abuse.

The statistics show it was overwhelmingly male on male abuse.

Because male teachers are assigned to male schools.

Because males do not lead Girl Scout troops.

How are you this stupid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let priests marry. Get rid of the gay/pedophile problem and you will go a long way to fixing this problem. Francis has already set this in motion with his recent comments on priests and marriage.

Don’t you mean the heterosexual/pedophile problem?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:….and not one of the perpetrators was transgender.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/us/catholic-church-abuse-baltimore.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

#GROOMERS

No, but they were predominantly homosexual pedophiles.

No they were not. It’s a crime of opportunity male abusers are more likely to work at all boys schools. When moved to girls schools they continued to abuse.

There has to be a sexual attraction first - it’s not just about the opportunity part.

Pedophiles are not attracted to a gender they are attracted to children of all genders. Children are essentially genderless .

You don’t know that? Are you lacking an education?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:….and not one of the perpetrators was transgender.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/us/catholic-church-abuse-baltimore.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

#GROOMERS

No, but they were predominantly homosexual pedophiles.

No they were not. It’s a crime of opportunity male abusers are more likely to work at all boys schools. When moved to girls schools they continued to abuse.

Over 95% of the victims (children) of these priests were male. 100% of the priests are/were men. How can you not say homosexual pedophile priests are/were the problem. Good lord. And I will throw in any straight priests who covered for them. Wish they could’ve locked all these sickos up but please do not cover for priests just because they are gay. Not all gay priests were pedophiles but these ones certainly were.

Because there were no girl alter boys, because men taught at boy schools. Geez you guys need to educate yourselves. So much ignorance.

Guess what most rape in jail is male on male… do you know why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and Happy Easter everyone!

Make sure you tithe today so the money can go to lobbyists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:….and not one of the perpetrators was transgender.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/us/catholic-church-abuse-baltimore.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

#GROOMERS

No, but they were predominantly homosexual pedophiles.

No they were not. It’s a crime of opportunity male abusers are more likely to work at all boys schools. When moved to girls schools they continued to abuse.

There has to be a sexual attraction first - it’s not just about the opportunity part.

Pedophiles are not attracted to a gender they are attracted to children of all genders. Children are essentially genderless .

You don’t know that? Are you lacking an education?

Ha ha ha. Oh, I see. It’s just an accident that almost every instance of abuse is between an adult male and juvenile male? I see. What world do you live in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:….and not one of the perpetrators was transgender.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/us/catholic-church-abuse-baltimore.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

#GROOMERS

No, but they were predominantly homosexual pedophiles.

No they were not. It’s a crime of opportunity male abusers are more likely to work at all boys schools. When moved to girls schools they continued to abuse.

There has to be a sexual attraction first - it’s not just about the opportunity part.

Pedophiles are not attracted to a gender they are attracted to children of all genders. Children are essentially genderless .

You don’t know that? Are you lacking an education?

Ha ha ha. Oh, I see. It’s just an accident that almost every instance of abuse is between an adult male and juvenile male? I see. What world do you live in?

No it’s because girls were not allowed to be alter boys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:….and not one of the perpetrators was transgender.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/us/catholic-church-abuse-baltimore.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

#GROOMERS

No, but they were predominantly homosexual pedophiles.

No they were not. It’s a crime of opportunity male abusers are more likely to work at all boys schools. When moved to girls schools they continued to abuse.

Over 95% of the victims (children) of these priests were male. 100% of the priests are/were men. How can you not say homosexual pedophile priests are/were the problem. Good lord. And I will throw in any straight priests who covered for them. Wish they could’ve locked all these sickos up but please do not cover for priests just because they are gay. Not all gay priests were pedophiles but these ones certainly were.

Because there were no girl alter boys, because men taught at boy schools. Geez you guys need to educate yourselves. So much ignorance.

Guess what most rape in jail is male on male… do you know why?

Delusional. Priests had opportunities to access both boys and girls. Guess what? In almost every instance they chose males. Not because that was all that was there, it was all they desired. There is always this knee-jerk reaction when someone brings up the painfully obvious point that gay men flooded the priesthood particularly from the ‘50s to the ‘80s and some of them had proclivities towards young males. Shocker.