Reply to 600 child abuse victims of the Catholic Church in MD

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "600 child abuse victims of the Catholic Church in MD"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]….and not one of the perpetrators was transgender.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/us/catholic-church-abuse-baltimore.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

#GROOMERS[/quote]

No, but they were predominantly homosexual pedophiles. [/quote]

No they were not. It’s a crime of opportunity male abusers are more likely to work at all boys schools. When moved to girls schools they continued to abuse.[/quote]

Over 95% of the victims (children) of these priests were male. 100% of the priests are/were men. How can you not say homosexual pedophile priests are/were the problem. Good lord. And I will throw in any straight priests who covered for them. Wish they could’ve locked all these sickos up but please do not cover for priests just because they are gay. Not all gay priests were pedophiles but these ones certainly were. [/quote]

Because there were no girl alter boys, because men taught at boy schools. Geez you guys need to educate yourselves. So much ignorance.

Guess what most rape in jail is male on male… do you know why?[/quote]

Delusional. Priests had opportunities to access both boys and girls. Guess what?  In almost every instance they chose males. Not because that was all that was there, it was all they desired. There is always this knee-jerk reaction when someone brings up the painfully obvious point that gay men flooded the priesthood particularly from the ‘50s to the ‘80s and some of them had proclivities towards young males. Shocker. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics