Guess I'm just a realist. |
| Not all thoughts should be shared on the internet even anonymously. This is one of them. |
| OP here- damn you people are rude. Lucky I don’t actually live in DC and have to deal with you in person! |
Well, that, and also if they have sufficient armies to join with me to ensure that our grandchild will sit on the throne of France. |
+1. Sounds Duggar-ish. |
|
It didn't work out too well for Catherine de Bourgh.
Kidding aside, I don't think there's any harm in it, OP! |
No, that is just weird and degenerate. |
| I've done this, although of course I say nothing out loud. It's mostly that everyone's cute at that age and it would be fun to have my friends as in-laws. But as the kids grow up, the "pool" shrinks down dramatically -- a lot of those adorable babies are pretty annoying at 7+, LOL. |
Yes thus intolerant ugly slur against Christians has GOT to stop!! |
Sorry OP. When there is near-consensus on a thread… you know the problem is you. |
+1 Me too!
|
| Harmless |
Yeah we figured that you didn’t live here pretty quickly. |
I agree! How weird some folks here are...anyhow OP, I used to do the same, in a fun/lighthearted way. I have one young dc still but 2 of my dc are adults and married. One met their spouse at college (in another state, and spouse is from yet another state) and one married their high school sweetheart! So you just never really know how it turns out
I will say-we are involved in church, and the 'church kids' tend to not date or marry each other-they tend to regard the kids they came up with more like siblings! They remain friends but marry others. At least, this is how it happens in our particular type of church, maybe some more traditional ones might be different. |
NP here-there isn't actually a 'problem' here...if this is what you feel is the problem on DCUM today, that may be an issue you may need to reflect on. |